Posts

When we talk to our clients and workshop participants, most of them have some form of innovation initiative in place. Some have already begun pouring funding into R&D, while others have trained teams and set up new innovation processes.

However, achieving your innovation objectives is more than just putting together ideas and running with them. You first need a key element in place to see it to success — a clearly defined innovation strategy.

Unfortunately, this is something most firms overlook, according to innovation and competitive strategy expert Gary Pisano.

Fortify your innovation strategy by answering these 3 questions:

1. Are our objectives aligned?

The best strategies are usually based upon a clear objective, where vague statements like “we need to innovate now because everyone else is innovating,” or “we need to innovate so we can grow” have no place.

First, it’s important to be aligned on which type of innovation you are looking at.

There are 3 types of innovation:

  1. Efficiency-based innovation — where you focus on cutting costs, to do more with the same capital, usually a LEAN process, where you are fine-tuning and downsizing.
  2. Performance improving innovation — where you upgrade your existing products and services.
  3. Market-creating innovations — creating entire new business models, serving entirely new customers, puts your capital to use and creates the most value from a shareholder perspective.

Ask your team: what does “market-creating innovations” mean to our company?

2. Do we have the Money, Structure and Mandate in place?

There are 3,000 ideas for every one that makes it to market. The problem isn’t the idea. The problem is the system, processes, methods, tools, and resource allocation. If any of these are not in place, you are effectively killing off the ideas as they move down the pipeline.

In our research over the past 5 years, we realized that most innovation strategies that succeed are built upon the holy trinity of Money, Structure and Mandate.

Even if your ideas are brilliant, you will need the money (funding), structure (trained teams and a conducive corporate structure), and the mandate (support from the higher ups) to secure a successful transformation.

Here’s a quick score sheet from the Transformation Architecture strategy tool to help identify where you stand before you hit go. The higher your score, the better your chances at success.

Transformation Architecture

 

3. What are my next steps if some/none of them are in place?

Now comes the real work. It’s easy if you’ve got the entire package, from funding for new ideas and ventures, trained departments to be responsible for these new ventures, to the thumbs-up from the Board of Directors and top management.

It’s just a tad more challenging if you’re lacking an ingredient or two.

So where should you start? By asking the right questions.

Asking questions will help uncover a framework to start working with, so you can get the Money, Structure and Mandate set up for maximum transformation success.

What are the right questions to ask? Easy. They’re all in the free Transformation Architecture strategy tool that you can download by clicking the button below.

To get a more in-depth understanding of how the tool came about, you might want to take a peek at our lead facilitator Christian Rangen explaining the Transformation Architecture to workshop participants:

_______

Join the Strategy Tools World Tour 2017

Engage // Innovate’s strategy tools for business model innovation have been used by top innovative companies like LEGO, Reckitt Benckiser, PWC and many more.

Generate new revenue-creating business models with our strategy tools in a 2-day in-house workshop, anywhere in the world. Learn more or sign up at strategytoolsworldtour.com.

Over at Engage//Innovate — a strategy and consulting firm, we view the challenges of the entrepreneurial society through the prism of the Norwegian oil and gas predicament.

Over the past 40 years, oil and gas has played a large role in the strong growth of our economy. About a quarter of our entire GDP is tied to oil and gas extraction.

Considering its significance to the Norwegian economy, the structural decline of the oil and gas industry which began in 2014, has spurred the government and businesses alike to rethink the state of entrepreneurial policies, politics and corporate ventures.

Building Transformational Capacities

Few could claim any reasonable sustainable solutions to the challenges ahead, and many have tried to address them in a very simplistic manner.

For instance, the Norwegian government — through overly-simplistic budgetary policies — have swept aside the complexity inherent to a global economy by simply putting more money on the table.

Drucker would have said “governments were unable to play such a role in a rapidly changing environment of globalization, digitization and accelerating disruption.”

Historically operating in a local marketplace, the companies across the oil and gas value chain within the original firm have suffered greatly in the face of rapid change due to their inherent corporate and monopolistic behavior.

Building transformational capacities in a global entrepreneurial economy is still a work-in-need-of-great progress.

Innovating for PR

While one could reasonably argue that creating space mining adventures, sub-sea factories, floating hotels and solar plants on water all indicate a corporate behavior for innovation, in reality these are little more than mere PR stunts.

The big question that arises is “what is truly the role of the state vs the entrepreneur in the face of a structurally declining oil and gas industry?”

Equally important is the regulatory intervention played by the state, through economical policies which protect the past rather than help companies think beyond tomorrow.

In a nation state where the job growth over the past 4 years has mostly been from the public sector, little evidence except for PR stunts support the notion of a truly entrepreneurial society.

The Future of the Norwegian Economy

Looking at today’s market capitalization of Tesla vs Statoil, one can clearly tell where the investors are placing the future.

In this age of digitally transparent and connected marketplaces, governments should refrain from protecting the past and instead let Schumpeter’s notion of destruction run rampant. Only then can our national economy, arising from the age of the vikings, truly grasp the entrepreneurial society.

We greatly fear that should civil and political leadership fail at their significant tasks, we will be left with the society in upheaval and disturbingly receptive to populism politics.

In the face of these challenges, the overarching priority for any executive team should not primarily be serving shareholder value, but truly taking a long-term view and build deep, lasting, transformational capacities.

_____

Read next:
Transforming a Nation: How We Helped Companies Build New Growth Ventures in Days, Not Years