Want to see grown executives sweat? Put them in charge of a $50B transformation challenge. Then watch the magic happen.

Here’s the brutal truth: Most leaders talk a good game about transformation, but when crisis hits, they crumble faster than a house of cards in a hurricane. That’s exactly why Duke, IE Business School, Hult, Microsoft, and Equinor are all using the same secret weapon to forge genuine transformation leaders.

Meet Transform! —the simulation that’s revolutionizing how we develop transformation leadership skills.

Welcome Memo from the Board Chair. Are you ready to lead?
Welcome Memo from the Board Chair, part II. Let’s go!!

The Problem: Leadership Development That Actually Doesn’t

Traditional leadership programs are like learning to swim by reading a manual. Lots of theory, zero practice, and when you hit the water, you sink.

Meanwhile, real transformation requires mastering 12 interconnected skills simultaneously:

Team Mastery: Leadership, Teamwork, Complex Problem-Solving, Decision-Making

Strategic Firepower: Strategy & Transformation, Innovation, Strategic Finance, Competitive Dynamics

Stakeholder Wizardry: Board & Governance, Capital Markets & Shareholders

Performance Excellence: Strategic Clarity, Winning Mindset

Most programs teach these in isolation. Transform! throws leaders into the deep end where all 12 skills must work together—or they fail spectacularly.

The Solution: Learning by Nearly Dying (Professionally)

Picture this: You and your team are the new management team of an established company. Your mission, should you choose to accept it: Transform your company and hit a $50B market cap. Small problem—you’re competing against up to six other teams who want to outperform and crush you.

“Many people get overwhelmed. They function poorly as a team. They get stressed. They make bad decisions. They are unable to collaborate on strategy. This is by design.”

Transform! doesn’t coddle participants. It subjects them to:

  • Business model portfolios for long-term value creation
  • Entrepreneurial mindset by juggling new business opportunities
  • Digital skills by using a wide range of AI tools in practice
  • Hostile competitors trying to steal your market share
  • Activist investors demanding immediate results
  • Time pressure that would make any management team falter
  • Financial resource constraints that force impossible choices
  • System thinking through a complex learning format
  • Strategic dilemmas with no clear right answer

The result? Leaders who can actually lead transformation, not just talk about it.

The Magic: 1,500+ Cards of Chaos and Opportunity

With over 1,500 unique content cards, based on 100’s of real-life strategy dilemmas developed with deep insights from many of the largest companies in the world, Transform! creates infinite scenarios. Your team might face:

  • How large part of the business should be ‘built with AI first’?
  • Should you bring in the “M&A Shark” for aggressive growth?
  • How much debt can you handle for those new gigafactories?
  • Can you survive rising interest rates while funding innovation?
  • Will that multi-stakeholder joint venture attempt backfire spectacularly?
Teams are exposed to 100’s of strategic possibilities; but can they make the right decisions?

Every decision cascades through the business system, teaching leaders that transformation isn’t linear—it’s a complex dance where finance, strategy, innovation, and leadership intersect in unpredictable ways.

Built on the research behind the Ten Principles of Transformation, Transform! takes participants on a deep dive, fast-paced journey into the world of C-suites and boardrooms globally. Get the Building the Transformational Company report here.

The 10 Principles of Transformation, based on the Building the Transformational Company research (Rangen, 2021)

The Proof: Real Results from Real Programs

IE Business School’s Success Story:

Peter Fisk, global thought leader and Academic Director of IE’s Global Advanced Management Program, embedded Transform! as the capstone experience. The results speak volumes:

  • A craft beer ecosystem created by Latin America’s largest bottling company
  • A South African bank drastically reducing loan approval times
  • A Japanese pharmaceutical company partnering with Silicon Valley startup for personalized medicine
  • A retailer growing from 500,000 to 5 million customers in three years

“We have so many examples of great results coming from the graduates of the program… This is typically the transformational outcomes we’re looking for.”

The Format: Flexible, Scalable, Devastating

Transform! adapts to your needs:

  • 2-3 day intensive formats for maximum impact
  • Hybrid models stretching over months (IE’s secret sauce)
  • 10-100+ participants per session
  • In-person or digital delivery, you choose
  • Six different industries to match your context

Whether you’re developing young talent or seasoned C-suite executives, Transform! scales the challenge appropriately. New hires get overwhelmed then breakthrough. Veterans find their real-world dilemmas reflected in the simulation.

You are the new leadership team of a well-established company, with declining sales and falling share price. The board is looking to you to lead the transformation. Can you deliver?

The Skills: All 12, All the Time

Unlike traditional programs that teach skills in silos, Transform! forces simultaneous development:

Part 1: Teams learn basic strategy and finance while making rapid-fire decisions

Part 2: Innovation strategy meets competitive dynamics under pressure

Part 3: Growth, M&A deals, activist investors, and board management collide

Participants don’t just learn about strategic finance—they use it as a competitive weapon. They don’t study teamwork—they build coalitions or watch their companies collapse. By powering through the intense experience Transform! is, participants are able to debrief, reflect and discuss their own experience, thoughts, confusion and mastery of the 12 leadership skills behind Transform! Most importantly, what are the key skills you bring back to work Monday morning?

Transform! 12 is a cornerstone of the debrief process, built on four pillars; Team, Strategy, Capital Markets & Performance

The Bottom Line: ROI That Actually Matters

For Business Schools: Transform! becomes your signature differentiator. Students graduate with genuine transformation experience, not just great lectures.

For HR Leaders: Stop sending executives to programs that don’t prepare them for real challenges. Transform! creates leaders who can actually deliver transformation results.

For Organizations: Every dollar invested returns exponentially when leaders can navigate complexity without panic.

Develop more strategic leaders? Drive a successful transformation? Teach the building blocks of a future-fit strategy? Try Transform

Global security challenges opens new growth opportunities. Should a German automotive company seize these Explore opportunities or rather focus on streamlining the old legacy business?

The Call to Action: Stop Pretending, Start Transforming

The transformation economy is here. Companies that can’t transform will die. Leaders who can’t lead transformation will become irrelevant.

The question isn’t whether you need these skills—it’s whether you’re brave enough to develop them properly.

Transform! doesn’t just teach transformation leadership. It forgets leaders through the fire until they emerge as transformation legends.

Ready to separate the real leaders from the pretenders?

Transform! is available for business schools and organizations worldwide.

Contact us to bring this game-changing, immersive experience to your leaders.

Transform! is trusted by leading institutions including IE Business School, Duke University, Hult International Business School, Microsoft, Equinor, and dozens of other forward-thinking organizations who understand that transformation leadership can’t be learned from a textbook.

Transform! is based on the research project, Building the Transformational Company and the Ten Principles of Transformation. Developed by Chris Rangen, with over 20 years experience working with boards, C-level and strategy leaders, Transform! is anchored in real-life challenges faced at the strategic level of the world’s leading organizations. Read more.

Want to learn more about the Strategy Sims methodology? Hear how the Strategy Sims went from zero to 10.000+ people in just six years? Pre-register for our upcoming report, Strategy Sims in Action today.

Preface

Leading up to the 2025 VC Fund Manager Masterclass in Mauritius, we explore the history and current ecosystem for venture financing in Mauritius. The country is already well-established as a financial services hub, with a thriving industry and large number of funds domiciled. Over a series of short articles we explore:

  • How did Mauritius grow into a fund management hub?
  • How is the venture industry performing today?
  • What is the future of venture capital and the VC ecosystem in Mauritius and Africa?

Introduction

The financial services sector in Mauritius has a rich history dating back to the 17th century when the island was used as a regional payments and settlements hub by traders. Today, Mauritius stands as one of Africa’s most sophisticated international financial centers, boasting over a thousand funds, a collective AUM in excess of USD 80 billion, and a sizeable number of them from development finance institutions and sovereign wealth funds. This transformation from a sugar-dependent colony to a global fund administration hub represents one of the most remarkable economic evolution stories in the developing world.

Historical Foundations: The Early Years (1968-1990s)

When Mauritius gained independence in 1968, few observers anticipated its future as a financial services powerhouse. Nobel Prize winner James Meade prophesied in the early 1960s that Mauritius’s development prospects were poor, citing the island’s heavy dependence on sugar, vulnerability to terms of trade shocks, and potential ethnic tensions.

While the financial sector was already relatively well developed at independence, the robust economic performance over the last two decades strongly contributed to its further expansion. The Bank of Mauritius, established as the central bank, played a crucial role from the beginning. From the very beginning the BOM focused on creating the framework for a modern financial intermediation system that could allocate resources efficiently to fund development needs.

The foundation for modern financial services was laid early, with treasury bills issued by tender on a monthly basis starting in April 1969, and the central bank providing forward cover for foreign exchange risk as early as 1968/69, recognizing the economy’s openness and dependence on trade.

The Offshore Revolution: 1990s Transformation

The real transformation began in the early 1990s with strategic legislative changes that would reshape Mauritius into a global financial center. Following the economic liberalisation in India in 1991 and the creation of the Mauritius Offshore Business Activities Act (MOBAA) in Mauritius in 1992, there was a rise of activities in the Mauritius Offshore Sector.

The government implemented several key reforms that laid the groundwork for the fund administration industry:

  • 1994: The Government abolished the foreign exchange control by suspending the Foreign Exchange Control Act in order to enable free repatriation of capital
  • 1996: A deemed foreign tax credit was conceived as a simple and practical approach to the domestic fiscal treatment of foreign investment returns

These reforms created the enabling environment that would attract international fund managers and administrators to establish operations in Mauritius.

The New Millennium: Regulatory Sophistication (2000s-2010s)

In the 2000s, Mauritius embarked on a transformation period with the view of establishing a more stable and reputable financial centre. The most significant milestone came in 2001 with comprehensive regulatory reform.

In 2001, the MOBAA was repealed and replaced by the Financial Services Development Act. Subsequently, in the same year, the Financial Services Commission (FSC) was set up to replace MOBAA, to regulate and supervise all non-banking financial services.

The FSC’s establishment marked a turning point in the industry’s evolution. The vision of the FSC is “to be an internationally recognized Financial Supervisor committed to the sustained development of Mauritius as a sound and competitive Financial Services Centre”.

This period saw significant growth in the fund administration sector, with Mauritius positioning itself as a gateway for investments into Africa and Asia, leveraging its strategic location and favorable time zone.

Current Industry Landscape: A Global Hub

Today, Mauritius has emerged as a dominant player in the global fund administration industry. Mauritius is home to some of the most impactful and leading funds from around the world, with impressive statistics that underscore its significance:

  • The Mauritius IFC also hosts reputable legal firms, professional services firms and renowned management companies, which collaboratively service nearly 1000 global funds and facilitate operations for over 15,000 companies in the Global Business sector
  • The MIFC counts more than 450 private equity funds that are investing in Africa and nearly $40 billion investments in Africa were structured through Mauritius

Leadership Perspectives on Industry Evolution

Dr. Désiré Vencatachellum – FSC CEO on Future Vision

The industry’s future direction is being shaped by new leadership with a clear vision. Dr. Désiré Vencatachellum, the newly appointed CEO of the Financial Services Commission, brings over 30 years of experience in development finance. “Harnessing this strength will be key to advancing our financial ecosystem,” he said, referring to Mauritius’s tremendous potential and wealth of talents.

Dr. Vencatachellum emphasizes the strategic importance of Mauritius’s positioning: “We must shape the FSC that is not only relevant for today’s challenges but also resilient and forward-looking for 2030 and 2050”. He highlights the key role of Mauritius as a dynamic gateway between Africa and Asia.

PwC’s Sharvin Ballah on Market Opportunities

Sharvin Ballah, Partner at PwC Mauritius, provides insights into the sector’s growth potential. In absolute terms, the AWM expansion would be the fastest growing in the Middle East and Africa at a projected 6.9% CAGR. He emphasizes that Mauritius, as a prominent International Financial Centre (IFC), has demonstrated its capabilities to serve that purpose.

Ballah highlights the competitive advantages: Strategically positioned with an advantageous time zone between Africa and Asia, the Mauritian jurisdiction is highly regarded as a favourable business destination with a range of unique offerings for the AWM sector.

Tax and Regulatory Framework: Competitive Advantages

Mauritius offers one of the most attractive tax regimes for fund administration globally:

  • There is no capital gains tax in Mauritius and no withholding tax on dividends and interest
  • As a result, 80% of the foreign-source income derived by a Collective Investment Scheme (CIS), Closed-End Fund (CEF), CIS manager or CIS administrator are exempted from income tax
  • Recent enhancements include the announcement to increase the partial exemption to 95% for Collective Investment Schemes (CIS) and Closed End Funds (CEF)

The regulatory framework is comprehensive and internationally compliant. Mauritius’s financial services sector upholds corporate governance and international regulations through the overarching Financial Services Act (FSA) and oversight by the well-established Financial Services Commission (FSC).

Innovation and Technology: Embracing Digital Transformation

The industry is embracing technological innovation to maintain its competitive edge. Automation and fintech innovations are shaping the future of admin services. Automation has led to increased efficiency in the calculation of NAVs, financial reporting, and compliance monitoring.

Mauritius has also moved to accommodate emerging asset classes. The FSC has recognised such digital assets as constituting asset-class for investment by sophisticated and expert investors, Professional CIS, Expert Funds and specialised CIS.

Challenges and Opportunities: Looking Ahead

Despite its success, the industry faces challenges from global regulatory changes. The new amendments to the double taxation agreement are likely to constrain the growth of Mauritius’ offshore sector. Critics note that the financial sector has not transformed beyond providing basic services like fund administration, unlike more diversified financial centers such as Singapore.

However, industry leaders remain optimistic about future prospects. Expectations and hopes are higher than ever before with the Global assets under management (AuM) targeted to rebound by 2027, with expected revenues of up to US$622.1 billion, of which 50% is forecast to be generated from private markets.

The African Connection: Strategic Positioning

Mauritius’s role as a gateway to Africa remains central to its value proposition. Besides its location and strong network, Mauritius offers excellent connectivity to conduct and facilitate business with the emerging African market.

The government has actively promoted this positioning through various initiatives, including the creation of a Mauritius Africa Fund (MAF) in 2013, a public entity with a budget of $11 M to assist Mauritian companies to invest in Africa.

Regulatory Excellence and International Recognition

Mauritius has achieved recognition for its regulatory standards. Globally, the island stands out as one of the very few countries which are compliant with all the 40 recommendations of the FATF, placing significant emphasis on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist (AML/CFT) measures within a robust framework aligned with international norms and best practices.

Economic Impact and Future Strategy

The fund administration and management industry has become a cornerstone of Mauritius’s economy. It transformed itself from a country with a per capita income of US$260 in the 1960s to one with a per capita income of more than $10,000 in 2021.

In 2015, the Ministry of Financial Services, Good Governance and Institutional Reforms was created and the Government has since then embarked on a strategy to further graduate Mauritius as a full-fledged International Financial Centre.

Conclusion: A Sustained Success Story

The evolution of Mauritius’s fund administration and fund management industry represents a remarkable transformation story. From its origins as a colonial trading post to becoming noted as the gold standard for fund management and administration, Mauritius has demonstrated the power of strategic vision, regulatory excellence, and adaptive governance.

As Dr. Vencatachellum noted, Mauritius has tremendous potential and is home to a wealth of talents. With over USD 80 billion in assets under management and a regulatory framework that continues to evolve with global standards, Mauritius is well-positioned to maintain its leadership in the global fund administration industry.

The industry’s future success will depend on continued innovation, regulatory adaptability, and the ability to serve as an effective bridge between international capital and emerging market opportunities, particularly in Africa. As the sector looks toward 2030 and beyond, the foundations laid over five decades of strategic development provide a strong platform for continued growth and evolution.

Invitation: Upcoming Fund Manager Masterclass

We are thrilled to be hosting the first ever VC Fund Manager Masterclass in Mauritius October 28th – 30th. Read more and sign up today.

Sources and References

  1. Mauritius International Financial Centre. “History.” Accessed July 2025. https://mauritiusifc.mu/our-ecosystem/history
  2. Mauritius International Financial Centre. “Fund and Asset Management.” Accessed July 2025. https://mauritiusifc.mu/global-funds
  3. Financial Services Commission, Mauritius. “About Us.” Accessed July 2025. https://mauritiusifc.mu/government-agencies-regulators/financial-services-commission
  4. PwC Mauritius. “Asset and Wealth Management revolution: Central Hub in Mauritius.” https://www.pwc.com/mu/en/about-us/press-room/asset-and-wealth-management-revolution.html
  5. AllAfrica. “Mauritius: Deputy Prime Minister Meets Newly Appointed CEO of Financial Services Commission.” July 24, 2025. https://allafrica.com/stories/202507240623.html
  6. AFSIC. “The Role of Fund Administrators in Mauritius.” July 5, 2024. https://www.afsic.net/the-role-of-fund-administrators-in-mauritius/
  7. U.S. Department of State. “2024 Investment Climate Statements: Mauritius.” January 4, 2025. https://www.state.gov/reports/2024-investment-climate-statements/mauritius
  8. International Monetary Fund. “Mauritius: A Case Study.” Finance & Development, December 2001. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/2001/12/subraman.htm
  9. DTOS Group. “Budget Highlights 2023-2024 ‘To Dare & To Care’.” June 15, 2023. https://www.dtos-mu.com/budget-highlights-2023-2024-to-dare-to-care/
  10. The Conversation. “Mauritius’ next growth phase: a new plan is needed as the tax haven era fades.” November 14, 2024. https://theconversation.com/mauritius-next-growth-phase-a-new-plan-is-needed-as-the-tax-haven-era-fades-231008

By: Christian Rangen Rick Rasmussen

Over the past 15+ years of working with startup ecosystems across the globe, we’ve watched countless founders make the same expensive mistakes. They give away too much equity too early. They accept SAFE terms they don’t understand. They reach Series B only to discover their ownership has been diluted to single digits.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

The good news? Entrepreneurial finance isn’t rocket science. With the right readings, you can understand the mechanics of dilution, the vocabulary of venture deals, and the strategic choices that protect your ownership over multiple rounds.

We’ve curated this reading list based on three criteria: practical applicability, clarity of explanation, and relevance to the current fundraising environment. Whether you’re splitting equity with co-founders or negotiating your Series B, these books will give you the knowledge to make informed decisions.

We also cover this material in-depth in our Scale Up! Masterclasses. Want the short summary? Start with the Scaling Up in MENA story.

Why This Reading List Matters

According to recent Carta data analyzing over 43,000 US startups, the median founding team owns just 56% of their company after their seed round. By Series A, that drops to 36%. By Series B, founders collectively own just 23% of the company they built.

Think about that. Less than four years after incorporation, the founding team typically owns less than a quarter of their company.

Some dilution is inevitable—you need capital to grow. But we’ve seen too many founders accept unnecessary dilution simply because they didn’t understand their options. The difference between a founder who owns 8% at exit versus 15% can mean millions of dollars and fundamentally different life outcomes.

These ten books represent your education in avoiding those costly mistakes.

Get your reading hat on, let’s go study cap tables, deal terms and anti-dilution terms.

The Reading List: From Foundation to Mastery

Tier 1: Essential Foundation (Start Here)

1. Foundational Equity (Carta, 2025)

Start here. Not with a paid book, but with Carta’s free 52-page report on foundational equity.

This document contains the most current data on equity splits, dilution patterns, and fundraising benchmarks. You’ll learn that 46% of two-founder teams now split equity equally (up from 32% in 2017), that solo-founded startups have increased from 17% to 35% of all new companies, and that approximately 24% of two-founder teams lose a co-founder by year four.

The data is current (through Q1 2025), comprehensive, and directly applicable to decisions you’ll face in the next 90 days.

Founders’ ownership at IPO: does that matter…..?

Key insight: The report shows that SAFE valuation caps increased significantly in Q1 2025 for rounds above $500K, but the median seed round valuation remains at approximately $14-16M. This helps you calibrate your expectations against market reality.

2. Slicing Pie: Funding Your Company Without Funds (Mike Moyer)

Before you raise a dollar, you need to split equity with co-founders fairly. This is where most founding teams start with anxiety and emotion rather than frameworks.

Moyer’s “Slicing Pie” method provides a dynamic equity split model based on relative contributions over time. While controversial in some circles (critics argue it’s complex to administer), the underlying principle is valuable: equity should reflect actual contributions, not just initial promises.

The book is particularly useful for pre-seed teams trying to figure out fair splits when one founder contributes capital, another contributes code, and a third contributes customer relationships.

Moyer has written two companion books that are both worth reading, Slicing Pie Handbook goes into more depth on other who contribute to the company (suppliers, landlords, creditors) and Will Work for Pie covers issues including fair pay and advanced pie slicing skills.

When to read it: Before you sign your founder equity agreements. Many founders rush this step, creating resentment that festers for years.

3. Founder’s Pocket Guide: Cap Tables (Stephen R. Poland)

At just 100 pages, this is the most accessible introduction to capitalization tables available. Poland explains what a cap table is, how to read one, and—critically—how to model what happens to your ownership through multiple funding rounds.

The book covers basics like fully diluted ownership, option pools, and liquidation preferences in language that doesn’t require a finance degree.

Key insight: Most founders don’t realize that the option pool typically comes out of founder shares, not investor shares. This means if you agree to a 15% option pool as part of your Series A, your dilution is higher than you might expect. Poland explains this clearly with examples.

4. All of the other books in the Founder’s Pocket Guide Series:

Convertible Debt Founder Equity Splits Friends and Family Funding Raising Angel Capital Startup Valuation Stock Options and Equity Compensation Term Sheets and Preferred Shares

Each of these are focused on the circumstances you may be facing during your early raise.  This is the companion volume to the cap table guide, focused specifically on understanding term sheets.

Steven R. Poland and co-authors break down each one of these topics in easy-to-read tomes of under 100 pages apiece. Most importantly, he explains what matters and in what scenarios they may significantly impact your outcomes.

When to read them: When you start to run into situations that involve other parties that may be looking to invest or will affect your cap table. Don’t sign anything until you’ve read these books and understand every clause.

One Key insight: A $20M post-money valuation with a 1x non-participating liquidation preference is often better for founders than a $25M valuation with a 1.5x participating preference. Term Sheets and Preferred Shares teaches you to see beyond the headline number.

5. Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist (Brad Feld & Jason Mendelson)

This is the definitive guide to understanding venture capital term sheets and negotiations. Feld and Mendelson (both experienced VCs) pull back the curtain on how VCs think about deal terms, what they care about most, and where founders have negotiating leverage.

The book is comprehensive (around 300 pages) but very readable. It covers everything from economics (valuation, option pool, liquidation preferences) to control (board composition, protective provisions) to other terms (drag-along, right of first refusal, redemption rights).

What makes this book exceptional is the VC perspective. Feld and Mendelson explain why VCs ask for certain terms and which terms matter most to them. This helps you understand where to spend your negotiating capital.

Current relevance: The book is regularly updated. Make sure you get the 5th edition (2024) which reflects current market practices around SAFEs, rolling funds, and other recent innovations.

Tier 3: Strategic Depth

6. Entrepreneurial Finance: The Art and Science of Growing Ventures (Alemany & Andreoli)

This is a proper textbook used in entrepreneurial finance courses at top business schools, including LBS. It’s a great introduction text, covering everything from valuation to financial strategies to basic instruments.

The book provides frameworks for thinking about financial strategy in the European context, with a clear goal to fill a gap in the European market.

When to read it: After you’ve raised your pre-seed round and want to think more strategically about financial planning for later stages.

7. Fundamentals of Entrepreneurial Finance (Hellmann & Da Rin)

Another academic text, but with a more modern, streamlined approach than traditional finance textbooks. Hellmann and Da Rin focus specifically on the unique aspects of financing entrepreneurial ventures versus established companies.

The book covers topics like convertible notes, SAFEs, venture debt, and the relationship between financing choices and business model development. It’s particularly strong on helping you understand why different financing instruments exist and when each is appropriate.

Key strength: The book includes numerous case studies from real companies, helping you see how financial decisions play out in practice.

Tier 4: Comprehensive References

8. The Holloway Guide to Raising Venture Capital (Andy Sparks, et al.)

This isn’t a traditional book—it’s a comprehensive, regularly updated online guide (though available in print). The Holloway Guide is essentially an encyclopedia of venture capital fundraising.

The guide covers everything: how to find investors, craft your pitch, negotiate terms, conduct due diligence, close the round, and manage investor relationships post-funding. It includes templates, checklists, and current market data.

What makes it special: The guide is continuously updated to reflect current market conditions. The section on SAFEs, for example, includes the most current data on valuation caps, discount rates, and conversion mechanics.

When to use it: As a reference throughout your fundraising journey. You won’t read it cover-to-cover, but you’ll return to specific sections repeatedly as you encounter new situations.

9.  Startup Law and Fundraising (Swegle)

When the person on the other side of the table is an attorney trained in securities law or hires someone with that background, this book (subtitled “for entrepreneurs and startup advisors”) can provide context and background to help you parse and work your way through the legal morass.

Weighing in over 500 pages, the seventeen chapters are well organized, starting with Overview of Legal and Regulatory Mistakes, through Intellectual Property, Securities Laws, Fundraising and Exit, this book should be a staple for any semi-legal-minded founder that is looking to learn, avoid issues and have the best possible outcomes.

10. Venture Capital Deal Terms: A Guide to Negotiating and Structuring Venture Capital Transactions (de Vries, et.al.)

Written by a VC and two lawyers, this book unpacks deal terms and legal structures easily.

The book is packed and quite extensive. But when you’re negotiating specific terms and need to understand the legal implications, this is the definitive resource.

Who should read it: Founders negotiating Series B or later rounds, or anyone who wants deep understanding of the legal mechanics of venture deals.

How to Use This Reading List

Don’t try to read all ten books before you start fundraising. Here’s a more practical approach:

Pre-fundraising (Before incorporation):

  • Read Slicing Pie for co-founder equity splits
  • Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Cap Tables to understand the basics
  • Read Scaling up in MENA

First fundraising round (Pre-seed/Seed):

  • Read Foundational Equity (Carta) for current market data
  • Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Term Sheets before reviewing any terms
  • Read Venture Deals when you’re actively negotiating

Post-seed (Planning for Series A):

  • Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Startup Valuation
  • Read Entrepreneurial Finance for strategic planning
  • Use The Holloway Guide as a reference

Series A and beyond:

  • Read Fundamentals of Entrepreneurial Finance for depth
  • Keep Venture Capital Deal Terms as a reference
  • Return to Foundational Equity annually for updated market data

Three Critical Insights From This Reading List

After absorbing these resources, three insights emerge that every founder should internalize:

1. Post-money SAFEs protect founders better than pre-money SAFEs

According to Carta data, nearly 80% of SAFEs issued in Q1 2025 were post-money SAFEs. This isn’t accidental. With a post-money SAFE, founders know exactly what ownership percentage they’re selling. With a pre-money SAFE, the actual dilution depends on how much total SAFE funding you raise—creating uncertainty and often greater-than-expected dilution.

If an investor proposes a pre-money SAFE in 2025, ask why. It’s increasingly non-standard.

2. The option pool matters more than most founders realize

The Carta data shows that Employee Stock Option Pools (ESOPs) typically range from 12% to 22% of fully diluted equity across different funding stages. Here’s what many founders miss: this pool is usually created just before an investment round and comes out of the founder/existing shareholder equity, not the new investor equity.

If you’re raising a Series A with a pre-money valuation of $40M and investors want a 15% option pool, that 15% is carved out of your ownership before the new investment arrives. This effectively reduces your valuation by the size of the pool.

Understanding this dynamic (covered well in Poland’s cap table guide and Feld’s Venture Deals) will save you from unexpected dilution.

3. Equal splits are increasingly common but not always optimal

The Carta data shows that 46% of two-founder teams now split equity equally (50/50), up from 32% in 2017. For three-founder teams, 27% split equally, up from 12% in 2015.

While equal splits can work well for teams with genuinely equal contributions, they can create problems if one founder contributes significantly more or if roles diverge substantially over time. Don’t default to equal splits just because they’re common—use frameworks from Slicing Pie and Foundational Equity to think through what’s actually fair for your specific situation.

Beyond the Books: Practical Tools

Reading these books is valuable, but knowledge becomes power when combined with practical tools:

Books & Magic finance at Ashridge House (I’ll be teaching there this week)

Use Carta Launch (free until you raise $1M) to model your cap table scenarios. The platform lets you simulate what happens to ownership across multiple funding rounds with different terms. Before accepting any term sheet, model it in Carta to see the actual dilution impact.

Create a fundraising knowledge base: As you read these books, create a personal reference document with key terms, standard ranges, and your own red lines. This becomes your negotiating guide when you’re in the middle of fundraising pressure.

Join founder communities: Reading about fundraising is valuable, but learning from founders who’ve recently closed rounds is invaluable. Communities like South Park Commons, On Deck, or local founder groups provide context these books can’t.

Sign up for a Scale Up Masterclass: more than 4.000 participants have completed a Scale Up! program over the past seven years. From Canada to Cairo, Cape town to Oslo, founders, angels, mentors, faculty, executives and even VCs have built their skills with Scale Up! Join us for Scale Up Global!, Scale Up MENA! or Scale Up Africa Rising!

A Final Note on Information Asymmetry

VCs read these books. Angel investors read these books. Your lawyers (if you’ve hired good ones) know this material cold.

The information asymmetry in fundraising heavily favors investors. They’ve done dozens or hundreds of deals; you’re doing your first.

This reading list won’t eliminate that asymmetry, but it substantially reduces it. After absorbing these resources, you’ll recognize when terms are non-standard, when you’re being asked to accept unfavorable provisions, and—perhaps most importantly—when to push back and when to accept.

The difference between an informed founder and an uninformed one often shows up years later at exit. The founder who accepted a 2x participating liquidation preference without understanding it might discover that a $100M acquisition barely returns their money after investors take their share. The founder who negotiated that down to 1x non-participating might walk away with $15M instead of $2M.

That difference comes from understanding the content in these ten books.

Start With Foundational Equity

If you do nothing else, download and read Carta’s Foundational Equity report this week. It’s free, it’s current, and it contains data on:

  • Solo founder vs. multi-founder dilution patterns
  • Median valuation caps by round size
  • Expected dilution benchmarks from pre-seed through Series D
  • Advisor equity standards by stage
  • Employee equity grant ranges by hire number
52 pages of cap table snack! Thanks, Peter.

This single document will calibrate your expectations to market reality and help you spot when terms are outside normal ranges. Thanks, Peter Walker !

Then, based on where you are in your journey, pick the next 2-3 books from this list that match your immediate needs.

Have you read any of these books? What other entrepreneurial finance resources have you found invaluable? Let us know—we’re always looking to refine this list based on founder experiences.

This reading list was compiled based on 15+ years of working with founders across seed, venture, and growth stages in programs from Europe, Americas, MENA, Africa and APAC. The recommendations reflect resources that consistently help founders make better financial decisions and avoid costly mistakes

How to Set Up a National Fund-of-Funds: A Strategic Blueprint for Ecosystem Builders

I just got out of a really interesting lunch conversation on how to set up a national fund-of-funds. Here are my notes, sketched out over lunch and expanded into a practical guide for anyone considering this journey.

The Lunch Meeting That Started It All

“We want to build a fund-of-funds,” our lunch meeting guest said, pushing aside his coffee cup to make some more notes. “We have the need, the support and the people, but we just need to get started”.

Sound familiar? Over the past decade, I’ve had this conversation in London, Dubai, Singapore and a dozen other cities. The enthusiasm is always there. The capital is increasingly available. But the roadmap? That’s where things get murky.

This article lays out a practical framework for setting up a national fund-of-funds—from understanding what you’re actually building to navigating the five critical decision points that will determine whether your fund becomes a catalyst for ecosystem transformation or another well-intentioned initiative that struggles to deploy capital.

Lunch sketch on national FoF’s. Three legs, capital, acceleration, LP networks.

What Is a Fund-of-Funds?

A fund-of-funds (FoF) is an investment vehicle that invests in other investment funds rather than directly in companies. Instead of writing checks to startups, a FoF writes checks to venture capital and private equity fund managers, who then deploy that capital into their portfolio companies.

Think of it as a layer of strategic capital allocation—you’re not just funding companies, you’re funding fund managers who will build relationships, develop deal flow, and create value across multiple portfolio companies over time.

Government-Backed Fund-of-Funds

Government-backed FoFs typically serve a dual mandate: financial returns and strategic ecosystem development. They’re designed to catalyze private capital formation, support emerging fund managers, and develop regional investment capacity. These funds often operate with longer time horizons and accept different risk-return profiles compared to purely commercial vehicles.

Key characteristics include:

  • Strategic ecosystem development objectives alongside financial returns
  • Patient capital with 10-15+ year time horizons
  • Willingness to anchor emerging fund managers
  • Focus on market failures and underserved segments
  • Often co-investment rights to increase deployment pace

Private Fund-of-Funds

Private FoFs are commercial vehicles focused primarily on risk-adjusted returns. They provide institutional investors access to top-tier fund managers, diversification across vintages and strategies, and professional due diligence. These funds compete purely on performance and must demonstrate clear LP value proposition.

Key characteristics include:

  • Return-focused with institutional LP base
  • Access to oversubscribed, top-tier managers
  • Portfolio construction expertise and diversification
  • Active secondary market participation
  • Strict performance benchmarking against indices

Notable Examples of Fund-of-Funds

The global FoF landscape includes both government-backed strategic vehicles and commercial institutional players. Here are some instructive examples:

Nysnø Klimainvesteringer (Norway)

Norway’s state-owned climate investment fund operates as a fund-of-funds with NOK 5 billion in capital, specifically targeting funds that invest in renewable energy, clean transportation, and emission reduction technologies. Nysnø demonstrates how government-backed FoFs can deploy capital toward strategic national priorities while maintaining commercial discipline. Their approach combines patient capital with clear climate impact metrics, showing that strategic objectives and financial returns aren’t mutually exclusive.

Dubai Future District Fund (DFDF) (UAE)

The DFDF represents the UAE’s strategic commitment to innovation and technology ecosystem development. This government-backed fund-of-funds focuses on backing both local and international VCs who can deploy capital into the region’s emerging technology companies. The fund serves as an anchor LP for emerging managers and helps establish Dubai as a competitive hub for venture capital activity in the MENA region.

Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) (Qatar)

While QIA operates across multiple asset classes, their fund-of-funds arm has become increasingly active in backing global venture capital and growth equity funds. Their strategy focuses on gaining access to leading managers globally while identifying opportunities for portfolio companies to expand into Middle Eastern markets. QIA demonstrates how sovereign wealth funds can use FoF structures to build relationships with top-tier managers and create pathways for international companies to enter new markets.

Jelawang Capital (Malaysia)

Jelawang Capital is a RM300 million fund-of-funds launched by the Malaysian government to accelerate local venture capital ecosystem development. The fund backs both established and emerging fund managers investing in Malaysian startups, with particular emphasis on technology and innovation-driven companies. Jelawang’s approach includes not just capital deployment but active ecosystem building through GP capability development.

Private Market Examples

Multiple Capital: A leading institutional fund-of-funds that focuses on providing emerging managers with anchor capital and strategic support. Their model combines financial backing with operational expertise, helping new fund managers navigate their first fund lifecycle.

Isomer Capital: Focuses on backing diverse fund managers and traditionally underrepresented GPs, demonstrating how FoFs can address systematic market gaps while generating competitive returns. Their thesis centers on the opportunity created when talented managers face traditional LP access barriers.

Cendana Capital: Perhaps one of the most successful early-stage fund-of-funds globally, Cendana has pioneered the micro-VC ecosystem development model. Founded by Michael Kim in 2010, Cendana became the first institutional investor in firms that went on to become some of the most successful seed-stage investors globally, including Forerunner Ventures, Initialized Capital, and SV Angel’s funds.

Watch Michael Kim discuss the Cendana Capital approach: Michael Kim | Founder of Cendana Capital on How Small VC Funds Can Return 200X+

Kim’s insight was recognizing that backing the right emerging managers at the seed stage—when they themselves needed patient capital to build their franchises—could generate exceptional returns while simultaneously developing the venture capital ecosystem infrastructure that startups needed to scale.

Understanding Your FoF Thesis: Two Examples

Before committing hundreds of millions in capital, you need absolute clarity on your investment thesis. A strong FoF thesis goes beyond “we want more venture capital in our ecosystem.” It requires deep understanding of market gaps, strategic positioning, and realistic success metrics.

Here are two contrasting but viable thesis examples:

Example 1: The Strategic Ecosystem Catalyst

Nordic Climate Technology FoF

Purpose: Accelerate Nordic leadership in climate technology by developing specialized fund management capacity focused on deep tech, industrial decarbonization, and sustainable infrastructure.

Geographic Focus: Priority to Nordic-based managers, with 40% allocation to European managers with Nordic co-investment commitment.

Stage Focus: 60% early-stage (seed through Series A) / 40% growth stage (Series B to PE)

Sector Focus: Climate technology, including energy transition, circular economy, sustainable materials, carbon capture, and industrial efficiency.

Target Fund Manager Profile:

  • Emerging managers (Fund I-III) with domain expertise
  • Proven investment professionals with climate technology sector knowledge
  • Strong technical networks in Nordic research institutions and corporate partners
  • Commitment to portfolio company value creation beyond capital

Strategic Value Creation:

  • Build dedicated climate tech investment capacity in region
  • Leverage Nordic strengths in renewable energy, maritime, and industrial technologies
  • Create pathways for portfolio companies to access Nordic corporate partners
  • Develop LP ecosystem around climate technology thesis

Success Metrics (5-Year):

  • 15+ fund managers backed representing 4+ Nordic countries
  • €800M+ in indirect portfolio company investment catalyzed
  • 50+ portfolio companies connected to Nordic corporate partners
  • 8+ GP teams expanded to raise Fund II
  • Top quartile IRR performance against European VC benchmarks

Example 2: The Commercial Access Vehicle

Pan-Asian Technology Growth FoF

Purpose: Provide institutional investors with curated access to top-performing growth-stage technology investors across Asia-Pacific, capturing returns from the region’s scaling digital economy.

Geographic Focus: Greater China 35% / Southeast Asia 30% / India 25% / ANZ + Japan 10%

Stage Focus: 80% growth stage (Series B through pre-IPO) / 20% late-stage venture (Series A-B)

Sector Focus: Enterprise software, fintech, e-commerce enablement, healthtech, and digital infrastructure. Explicitly avoiding consumer social and gaming.

Target Fund Manager Profile:

  • Established managers (Fund II+) with proven track record
  • Teams with regional operational networks and exit execution capability
  • Managers with differentiated sourcing in high-growth sectors
  • Portfolio construction discipline and realistic ownership targets

Strategic Value Creation:

  • Portfolio construction optimization across vintage years and strategies
  • Active position management and secondary market participation
  • Cross-portfolio strategic introductions for regional expansion
  • Proprietary LP reporting and portfolio transparency

Success Metrics (5-Year):

  • 25+ fund commitments across 12+ managers
  • Gross MOIC 2.5x+ with top-quartile DPI profile
  • 15+ portfolio companies achieving unicorn valuation or successful exit
  • Zero capital loss to fraudulent managers (through rigorous operational DD)
  • Successful Fund II raise based on demonstrated performance

These thesis examples illustrate fundamentally different approaches—one optimizing for ecosystem development with patient capital, the other optimizing for institutional returns with established managers. Both are valid. What matters is strategic clarity and consistent execution against your chosen model.

Use the FoF Thesis Canvas to get started.

Setting Up a National Fund-of-Funds: Five Critical Decision Points

So, back to that lunch meeting. What are the essential elements that determine success? Based on working with fund-of-funds teams across three continents, here are the five decisions that matter most:

1. Purpose: Why Are We Really Doing This?

This sounds obvious, but fuzzy purpose kills fund-of-funds faster than any other factor. You need brutal clarity on whether you’re building an ecosystem development vehicle, a commercial return optimizer, or something in between.

Key Questions:

  • What specific market failure or opportunity are we addressing?
  • What does success look like in 5 years? In 10 years?
  • How do we balance financial returns with strategic objectives?
  • What happens if these objectives conflict?
  • Who are our key stakeholders and what are their expectations?

Red Flags:

  • “We want to do what [other country/region] did” without understanding their context
  • Multiple conflicting objectives with no clear priority order
  • Success metrics that shift based on who’s asking
  • Purpose defined in terms of capital deployment rather than outcomes

Best Practice: Create a one-page strategy statement that articulates your purpose, success definition, and decision-making principles. Share it with every stakeholder. If you can’t get universal agreement on this document, you’re not ready to deploy capital.

2. Backing: Do We Have the Right Political and Industry Backing?

A fund-of-funds requires sustained commitment across political cycles and market conditions. Without genuine backing from both government (if public sector) and private industry, you’ll struggle to attract quality fund managers or maintain strategic focus when things get difficult.

What Real Backing Looks Like:

  • Multi-year capital commitment that survives budget cycles
  • Board composition that includes experienced fund-of-funds professionals and institutional investors
  • Political air cover when early investments underperform (because they will)
  • Private sector LP participation or endorsement
  • Support from existing fund manager community

Building Backing:

  • Conduct extensive stakeholder consultation before launch
  • Establish advisory board of experienced LPs and fund managers
  • Create transparent reporting mechanisms
  • Set realistic expectations about J-curve and long-term nature of returns
  • Develop champions in both political and business leadership

Warning Signs of Weak Backing:

  • Fund structure requires annual budget approval
  • Board lacks investment experience or changes frequently
  • Private sector skepticism about government involvement
  • Unrealistic return expectations from political leadership
  • Lack of committed capital beyond initial year

3. Investment Structure: What Should the Investment Structure Look Like?

Your investment structure needs to balance strategic flexibility with institutional discipline. This includes fund sizing, deployment pace, portfolio construction, and commitment sizing.

Critical Structural Decisions:

Fund Size: Right-size your vehicle for your ecosystem. A $50M fund-of-funds can back 5-10 managers meaningfully. A $500M fund needs 20-30 managers for diversification. Common mistake: oversizing the fund relative to investable universe.

Commitment Size: Typically $5-25M per fund, representing 5-15% of target fund size. Too small = no influence or economics. Too large = concentration risk and manager dependency.

Deployment Pace: Plan for 3-4 year investment period with 8-12 fund commitments per year. Front-loading creates portfolio construction problems. Back-loading suggests inadequate deal flow.

Vintage Year Diversification: Invest across multiple vintage years to reduce timing risk. Target 3-4 vintage years during investment period.

Re-Up Strategy: Decision framework for following managers into subsequent funds. Top-quartile performers typically get 1.5-2x commitment in Fund II.

Co-Investment Rights: Negotiate rights but be realistic about execution capability. Most FoFs lack resources for extensive co-investment.

Geographic and Sector Guardrails: Clear but not overly restrictive. “60% domestic, 40% international with domestic co-investment” works. “Exactly 25% in each of four sectors” creates portfolio construction problems.

4. GP Accelerator: How Do We Build a World-Class GP Accelerator?

Here’s the inconvenient truth: there should be no fund-of-funds without a supporting GP accelerator, especially in emerging markets.

Most FoFs I’ve ever seen fail for one key reason: their GPs can’t close and the FoF ends up not deploying their committed capital. You commit to backing 15 emerging fund managers. Two years later, only 5 have closed funds. You’re going back to the board explaining you’re holding “committed but not called capital” for years, and the GPs have given up.

The solution? Build GP capability development into your fund-of-funds strategy from day one.

What a GP Accelerator Provides:

  • Structured fundraising training and capability development
  • Access to LP networks through organized roadshows
  • Fund formation and legal infrastructure support
  • Portfolio management and value creation frameworks
  • Peer learning among cohort of emerging managers
  • Ongoing strategic advising throughout fundraising journey

Integration with FoF:

  • GP accelerator participants become qualified pipeline for FoF commitments
  • FoF acts as anchor LP for graduating accelerator participants
  • Combined model reduces risk of capital deployment failure
  • Accelerator fees can partially offset FoF operational costs
  • Creates sustainable ecosystem development model

Essential Components:

  1. Rigorous selection process (accept 10-15% of applicants)
  2. 3-6 month structured program combining hard work, mentorship, and LP access
  3. Dedicated program team with fundraising and fund operations expertise
  4. LP network partnerships for roadshow opportunities
  5. Post-program support and relationship management

For detailed frameworks on building GP accelerators, see our articles on Building a GP Accelerator and Planning a GP Accelerator: Use the GP Accelerator Business Model Canvas.

5. LP Network: How Do We Build a Winning LP Network Around Our FoF?

A fund-of-funds isn’t just a capital vehicle—it’s a network amplifier. Your LP network should strengthen your portfolio managers’ fundraising capability, not just provide capital.

Ready for a FoF yet? Try the LP Network Statement canvas first.

Strategic LP Network Building:

Anchor LPs: Secure 2-3 substantial anchor commitments from credible institutional investors or development finance institutions. These commitments validate your fund to the market and attract additional LPs into the GPs.

Complementary LP Mix:

  • Development finance institutions (patient capital, strategic alignment)
  • Family offices (flexible, relationship-driven)
  • Corporate strategics (industry connectivity)
  • Institutional investors (credibility, discipline)
  • High-net-worth individuals (fast decisions, enthusiasm)

LP Value Beyond Capital:

  • Make LP introductions to portfolio GPs for their fundraising
  • Create LP-GP networking events and roadshow opportunities
  • Facilitate portfolio company business development through LP networks
  • Share best practices and market intelligence across LP community

LP Reporting Excellence:

  • Quarterly reporting with portfolio-level and fund-level metrics
  • Annual LP meetings with portfolio GP presentations
  • Transparent discussion of underperformance and course corrections
  • Regular market insights and ecosystem development updates

Building the Network:

  • Start with 15-20 target LP prospect, build from there
  • Conduct extensive LP diligence on what they want from a FoF
  • Create LP advisory committee for ongoing strategic input
  • Long-term, aim for a network of 3.000 co-LPs you can work with
You can never have enough LPs, can you?

The Hard Reality: Timeline and Patience Required

Building and scaling a successful national fund-of-funds is not an easy task. It’s a multi-year effort—easily five years to show any meaningful results (deployed, not returned) and often 10-12 years to start showing underlying fund performance worth anyone’s attention.

Year 1-2: Fund formation, initial LP commitments, first GP scouting. Little visible progress beyond early conversations had.

Year 3-5: Early commitments. Portfolio construction, some closings. GP funds begin deploying into portfolio companies. Some early markups possible but no distributions.

Year 6-8: Early portfolio companies reaching inflection points. First modest distributions from faster-returning funds. Meaningful valuation increases. Fund II decisions for top-performing managers.

Year 9-12: Material distributions might begin. Performance relative to benchmarks becomes measurable. Ecosystem impact becomes visible. Capital recycling decisions.

Year 12+: Full cycle performance validated. Success stories emerge. Market demonstration effects visible. Fund II or successor vehicle decisions.

This timeline doesn’t account for the inevitable disappointments: managers who underperform, fraudulent operators who slip through diligence, market corrections that destroy portfolios, political pressure to deploy capital faster than prudent.

From Strategy to Execution

The lunch conversation that inspired this article ended with a clear call to action this week already. I am excited to see what that next conversation might being.

We already know, from emerging ecosystems in places like the Nordics and MENA, that a national fund-of-funds can transform an ecosystem. It can catalyze private capital formation, develop fund management capacity, and create pathways for startups to access growth capital. But only if it’s designed with strategic clarity, built with institutional discipline, and executed with patient commitment to long-term outcomes.

The napkin sketches from lunch was important. But it is the work that happens next that matter.

Want to Learn More About Building VC Ecosystems?

This article is part of an ongoing series on ecosystem development, fund strategy, and GP capability building. For more frameworks and insights:

Chris Rangen is a fund strategy advisor who has worked with 250+ emerging fund managers globally and has consulted on multiple fund-of-funds initiatives across Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Alongside colleagues like Scott B. Newton and Rick Rasmussen, he runs global VC Masterclasses and teaches at leading programs like IMD’s Venture Asset Management Program, led by Jim Pulcrano (Lausanne), and Newton Venture Program (London).

Over the past five years, he has designed and run 3 GP accelerators in collaboration with 2X GP Sprint, and he has helped design five more programs. He believes that thoughtfully designed fund-of-funds paired with robust GP accelerators can accelerate ecosystem development by 5-10 years compared to purely organic market development.

Reach Chris at Chris@strategytools.io or WhatsApp: +4792415949

Since start, we have delivered 250+ Scale Up Programs and Masterclasses, supporting 4.000+ founders, investors and ecosystem builders around the world.

This year alone, we’ll deliver 30 programs with nearly 600 participants. From impact founders in Southeast Asia, accelerators in South Africa, ecosystem builders in North America, tech founders in West Africa and top global ocean impact founders at Series A to name a few.

But who attends a Scale Up Program?

And what are their key benefits?

Here are the top 15 user groups we see.

1.    The young crowd

15-25 year old. Young. Excited. Engaged. In Canada, Michael and Stuart regularly run Scale Up! in high schools, proving that even 15- and 16-year old can manage growth strategy, customer discovery and cap tables. The young crowd is not a huge segment today, but we see a fantastic excitement with the participants as they learn entreprenurship, not in books, but by working and competing with their friends and peers.

Michael doing cap table math with High Schoolers. Canada, 2024

2. The students

19-25 year old. Young-ish. Thrilled to switch from classroom lecture to team-based competition. Absolutely love working with Scale Up! The students tend to be completely blank on anything to do with cap tables, equity math, but learn quickly.

In AustriaGermany and Italy, Enrico has been teaching Scale Up! for years in various business school programs. In Silicon Valley, Rick regularly use Scale Up! to teach entreprenurial finance. For faculty, using Scale Up! in the classroom is a superb way to make the teaching more engaging, more exciting and making learning stick.

ESCP Berlin, 2024

3.    The aspiring founders

20-30 year old. Have never started a company, but planning, hoping or aspire to. Are eager to learn the basics. Quickly realize that start, funding and scaling a new startup is a lot more ‘financing & math’ then they might have expected. They love the hands-on approach, the working visual format and the ability to discuss key terms and structures around the table as we work through the various Boom, Bust, Founder Tasks  and term sheets. In Hokkaido, Japan, Marcus ran the Scale Up Masterclass with a vast group of aspiring, Japanese founders, proving the format can transcend cultural barriers from West to East.

4.    First-time founders

We see a lot of these. First time founders may range from 18 – 45. Many are women starting their first company. Many have tried to learn and about fundraising, but typically had very mixed results to date.

Working with partners like EBRD, GIZ, Swiss EP(Entrepreneur), IFC, (formerly USAID) and Innovation Norway, we run a lot of programs supporting these first-time founders. In most cases, we prepare a pretty extensive pre-read package, giving participants time to read, reflect and complete a number of pre-session.

Cap tables, canvases and terms sheets. Swiss EP at work. Switzerland, 2022.

This year, first-time founder programs are taking our team to places like Estonia (Scott), Taipei (Suhail, Wan Fadzil), Oman (Mohammed) and Egypt (Chris),  to name a few places.

5.    Accelerator founders

Ok, now we are going somewhere. Accelerator founders is a big group, representing ca. 40% of all participants in a regular year. Most are early-stage, typically having raised 1-2 rounds of financing to date, most often through a SAFE or CLA instruments. In most cases, they are lacking the understanding of how SAFEs convert, how to structure the next round and how to shape a long-term capital strategy. Katapult Ocean (global), Savant (South Africa), Madica (West Africa), Net Zero Accelerator (Scotland) are some of the accelerators we have partnered with over recent years.

Within an accelerator, Scale Up! is usually delivered as an integrated part of the program, either in a 3-day format or longer 30-day, investment readiness format.

For founders, Scale Up! gives them a unique chance to experience many of the funding challenges they have ahead of them, and most truly appreciate the chance to build deeper skills in term sheets, cap table intricacies, investment instruments and generally strengthening their investment readiness.

Founder feedback, 2021.

6. Scaling founders

Having left  the messy seed-stages, the scaling founders are typically at Series A or Series B. They have significant experience with fundraising across stages, investor types and investment instruments. Most have had some ‘hard experiences’, or in several cases made every mistake in the book. Many quote, “oh, man, I wish we had had this two years ago…”.

Some people might believe that ‘at this stage, the founders should already know how to raise capital’. Nothing could be further from the truth. In fact, raising a pre-seed, seed, angel or accelerator round is usually based on future potential, with only limited strategy, DD and terms. Once you pass into ‘adulthood’ (how we explain the transition into Series A, things change. At Series A and B, the rounds tend to get more complex, legal advisors are often involved, term sheets tend to creep from 2-page SAFEs to 50-page equity contracts.

Navigating late-stage term sheets, Katapult Ocean, online, 2021

When we run Scale Up! with these founders, we don’t focus too much on the basics, but really dive into advanced term sheets, complex deal structures, investor outcomes and delivering on full and partial liquidity and exit  strategies. For most, we spend a half-day doing a complete IPO process, something most Series A founders have never experienced. “This has helped us completely rethink our Series A strategy”, said one UK founder recently. For Scaling founders, we often work with later-stage accelerators like Katapult Ocean, or with investment funds supporting their top portfolio companies.

In Dubai, our 2023 Masterclass with EO brought together 60+ highly experienced founders, many of them running large, successful companies; yet gaining massive benefits from the Scale Up Masterclass. Here, we mostly focused on the later stages of the journey, with outcomes, exits and holistic financing structures as our key focus points.

Structuring late-stage rounds, Dubai 2023

7. Accelerator staff

This is an interesting group. Globally, we have trained and certified accelerator staff in 15+ countries. It turns out, that most people working in an accelerator does not really understand what it takes to scale, how to read terms sheets, how to structure funding rounds and how to manage a cap table from pre-seed to exit. That’s ok, we cover all that in our Scale Up Masterclass for accelerator staff.

In places as diverse as SwitzerlandNorway, East Africa and South Africa, we have trained accelerator staff to become active users or facilitators of Scale Up! Many of them go on to embed Scale Up! into their programs.

Connecting accelerators to investment bankers, Egypt 2024

8. Investment firms, VCs, Family offices, Fund-of-funds

On one hand, we might think that professional investors would not need Scale Up. By now, they surely know this, right? Well, not our experience at all.

Scale Up! run for this group throws complex funding structures, complicated scaling strategies and highly challenging exit scenarios on the participants. “How will you avoid massive dilution?”, “how can you best structure your Series A, to maximize non-dilutive financing?”, and “How do you scale revenue fast enough to get maximum payout on the 8X ARR exit transaction, where you realize net debt actually becomes a real thing due to your excessive debt financing on the Series C transaction”. The kit remains the same, but we run this very, very differently with professional investors.

The outcome? They love it. “We know the basic stuff, the early-stage content”, said one investor recently. “but the later-stages, that was entirely new to us”. “Wow, this is really challenging, but gives you a super appreciation for the role the founders have in real-life”, said an investment manager with a European family office. Having taken VCs, FoFs, national climate funds and Family offices through Scale Up!, there is no doubt that investment teams can become even better at their job with Scale Up!

2X Ignite GP Sprint, real life VC funds, taking on Scale Up!, scaling African tech startups into global markets, Cape Town, 2024

9. Ecosystem builders, innovation agencies, DFIs

We never expected the level of excitement, engagement and competitiveness from a bank, but our 2024 DNB (startup advisor) Masterclass was truly impressive. Six teams, 25 participants and absolutely top notch performance. Who knew that a group of bankers would be some of the most engaged, competitive and excited Scale Up! participants we had seen in years? In fact, we find that banks, innovation agencies, ministries, Development Finance institutions and other key ecosystem developers truly thrive on Scale Up! For many, it is the first time they really get hands on with the key concepts, challenges and complexities of scaling a startup. Many advice founders on a daily basis, but never having built a startup themselves, this is the next best thing.

Six teams, scaling into five IPOs, all led by Norwegian bankers. Oslo, 2024.

In Vietnam, we have worked with ThinkZone to build out the Vietnamese ecosystem.  In British Columbia, InnovateBC host ecosystem development Masterclasses and in the UAE, and in Norway, the national innovation agency has been long-term user of Scale Up!

Scale Up! Masterclass, InnovateBC & the wider BC ecosystem. Vancouver, 2025

10. Angel investors, angel networks

Many angel investors, it turns out, have capital to invest, but are either unsure of how to invest or how navigate the world of CLAs, SAFEs, pre-money, post-money, cap table, mark-ups and mark-downs. This is where Scale Up (Angel!) comes in. We have been running a dedicated Angel version for years, blending both the scale up founder perspective and the successful angel investor perspective into the same, engaging program.

In places like Cairo, East Africa and the Nordics, we have trained and upskilled 200+ angel investors using Scale Up

Would you take this SAFE note? Founders and angels negotiating terms in Cairo. Egypt 2023

For new and experienced angel investors alike, the Masterclass truly allows them to get hands on, deploy (simulation) capital into a portfolio of startups and watch their investment either flat line, go to zero or return a 100+X cash-on-cash in the best cases. More importantly, vs. more traditional classroom based educational angel programs, participants get to feel the competitive pressure, get to sense the panic when their investment takes an 80% down round and the joy at the 500M exit to Google, returning back their investment many, many times over.

Looking ahead there is a massive potential in rolling out more Scale Up Angel! Masterclasses to upskill angels and build better, more active angel syndicates around the world.

11. Innovation clusters

Leadership teams at Innovation clusters were our very first audience when Scale Up! was developed. We did not know it at the time, but it quickly turned out that most clusters were sorely in need of a better understanding of startups, scale ups and basic cap table math. Thanks to a wonderful collaboration with Innovation Norway and the Norwegian national cluster program, 100’s of cluster leaders have built their entreprenurial skills with Scale Up!

Functioning as key ecosystem builders, cluster staff, cluster members and cluster leaders all serve a vital role, in better understanding and supporting young companies. Scale Up! fits this bill perfectly.

Innovation cluster management teams, hard at work on Scale Up! Oslo, 2019

12. Corporate innovation, corporate venture capital

One of the best performing teams ever came out of the Accenture London Program in 2024. The Founder Intelligence team (FI, a part of Accenture) have day jobs to support corporate clients on startup engagement, design corporate accelerators and help big companies better work with startups and scale ups.

Naturally, they brought these skills to the Masterclass. The Terrawattz $4trillion IPO (Think, Nividia, just better), set a new record for what can be achieved in a Scale Up! Masterclass.

Terrawattz Board IPO deck
Showing strong momentum going into the listing

In the debrief, discussing how the team achieved this extreme outlier performance, the answer was “we fed all our data into ChatGPT, and that helped us…”.

Having run 20+ programs for CVC teams, corporate innovation teams and corporate disruptors like FI,  we  see a strong upside for more corporate teams to experience the ups and downs of the Founder’s Journey with Scale Up!

13. Business school faculty, educators

A group we love working with, but would love to see many more of, is the business school faculty. Scale Up! fits perfectly into a classroom program, having taught 1000+ students to date. Yet, getting faculty and educators to join and invest their time is always an uphill battle.

Honorable mentions include our Silicon Valley friend, Rick Rasmussen, who has been one of the most active Scale Up! educators anywhere in the world. Rick has shown an impressive flexibility in bringing Scale Up! into his many classrooms.

What we do see, however, is that many in the next group,  once certified, are easily stepping into classrooms, taking on roles as visiting faculty to teach entrepreneurship with Scale Up!

Exit paths, exit paths, Egypt 2023.

14. Mentors, advisors, consultants

Our final group is a broad one. These include consultants and advisors serving startups on their investment readiness and fundraising success. These consultants, mentors and advisors tend to already be highly active in their respective ecosystems. They are usually well versed in the challenges of building a scale up. They understand fundraising challenges, cap table math and love reading term sheets over coffee.

What Scale Up! does for them is provide a single package, a simulation kit, where they can apply their extensive knowledge in a whole new way. Expanding from ‘advisors’ to ‘facilitators’, they realize they can train, support and accelerate a vast cohort of founders, combining their existing expertise with the Scale Up! materials. These people tend to sign up for a Discovery session, complete the certification in record-time and join the Strategy Tools Master Trainer to learn from the source.

In Bahrain, we partnered with Falak Innovation and Tamkeen to deliver the first ever Scale Up Masterclass in the country. For many founders and participant, this was the first time they really got into what it means to build and scale a startup in MENA.  For Suhail Algosaibi as an active mentor and business angel, Scale Up! was just one more way of supporting young companies in the region.

Suhail, running one out of two groups in Bahrain. Bahrain, 2024.

15.   Anyone else?

If you are one of our global, certified Scale Up! experts, who did we miss? Any other group you would like to add? Leave your thoughts in the comments.

What is Scale Up!?

Scale Up! is a team-based, action-packed, ultra-competitive simulation to learn and master the founder’s journey from idea to successful exit. Working in teams, participants choose a case company, and then work through 6-10 years to scale the company into a global winner.

Scale Up! covers a wide range of teaching content, including:

  • Scaling mindset
  • Foundational equity
  • Customer discovery
  • Business models
  • Revenue growth (ARR)
  • Fundraising (SAFE, CLA, Equity) from pre-seed to Series F
  • Term sheets
  • Outcome analysis
  • Partial investor liquidity
  • Full exit transaction

Scale Up! is available in the following versions:

  • Scale Up Global! (global content)
  • Scale Up MENA! (100% MENA content)
  • Scale up! Angel (for angel investors)
  • with Scale Up Africa Rising! launching in Q1 2026

Learn more? Get certified?

Want to learn more about Scale UpScale Up MENA or Scale Up Angel? Check out our website.

Curious to dig into the full Strategy Sims universe and learn more about the methodology, get our latest reportStrategy Sims in Action, co-authored by a global community of Scale Up! experts.

Two island nations. Identical populations. Radically different venture outcomes.

Estonia and Mauritius each have approximately 1.3 million people. Yet Estonia has produced 10 unicorns valued at over $1 billion each, while Mauritius struggles to attract even $2 million in annual startup funding. What explains this 500x difference in venture capital success?

In advance of the upcoming Fund Manager Masterclass in Mauritius, we have analyzed both ecosystems through the lens of the VC Ecosystem Canvas, the answer lies not in any single factor, but in how eight critical components work together—or don’t. Here’s what the data reveals.

The VC Ecosystem Canvas. (Rangen, 2024, www.strategytools.io)

1. Talent, Culture & Dealflow: The Foundation

Estonia: A Self-Reinforcing Flywheel

Estonia has cracked the code on talent recycling. When Skype was acquired by eBay for $2.6 billion in 2005, it didn’t just create wealth—it created a generation of experienced entrepreneurs and angel investors. The “Skype Mafia” went on to found or fund companies like Wise, Bolt, and Pipedrive.

Today, Estonia’s tech workforce has grown nearly tenfold in the past decade. The country produces a steady stream of STEM graduates who view entrepreneurship as a viable career path. More importantly, 25% of Estonian startup founders are now foreign-born, attracted by the e-Residency program and Startup Visa—proving that talent acquisition transcends borders when the ecosystem is right.

The dealflow is robust: over 1,400 active startups generating hundreds of investment opportunities annually.

How to tap into more high-growth dealflow?

Mauritius: Potential Without Pipeline

Mauritius produces 1,200 STEM graduates annually and has an impressive 79% smartphone penetration rate. The infrastructure is there. But the entrepreneurial culture is still developing.

As one local founder told researchers: “It’s an unfortunate cycle because to expand outside the country, you need funding which is rare because investors think Mauritius is too small a market.”

The country currently has just over 100 tech startups—less than 10% of Estonia’s number. Without exits creating successful entrepreneur-investors, there’s no flywheel effect. The talent exists, but the culture of ambitious, globally-minded entrepreneurship is still nascent.

2. Early-Stage Financing: Angels Make or Break Ecosystems

Estonia: Active Angel Network

The Estonian Business Angels Network (EstBAN) has over 300 active members providing €20,000-€500,000 in seed funding. These angels don’t just write checks—they’re typically successful entrepreneurs themselves who provide mentorship, networks, and credibility.

The presence of experienced angels means Estonian startups can access pre-seed and seed capital relatively easily, allowing them to validate ideas before approaching institutional VCs.

Mauritius: The Missing Middle

Mauritius lacks a robust angel investor culture. The Mauritius Africa FinTech Hub provides some early-stage support, but the ecosystem doesn’t have the density of high-net-worth individuals with startup experience who can write €50,000-€200,000 checks.

This creates a critical gap: startups can’t get the initial capital needed to prove their concept and attract larger VC rounds. Without angels, the entire funnel breaks down.

Early-stage networks matter

3. Venture Capital & Growth Financing: Follow-On Matters

Estonia: €1 Billion Ready to Deploy

Estonian VC funds currently have approximately €1 billion in capital available for deployment. Major local players like Superangel, Tera Ventures, Change Ventures, and Karma Ventures are complemented by international giants like Sequoia, Accel, and Andreessen Horowitz.

Critically, Estonia attracts 8x more venture capital per capita than the EU average and leads globally with VC funding representing 1.17% of GDP—higher than Singapore, Israel, or the United States.

The ecosystem supports companies through multiple rounds: seed, Series A, Series B, and beyond. Bolt raised €628 million in 2022 alone. This depth of capital means Estonian startups don’t hit a funding cliff as they scale.

Mauritius: Gateway Capital, Not Growth Capital

Mauritius is projected to see $224.9 million in VC market volume for 2024, but here’s the catch: most funds domiciled in Mauritius invest elsewhere in Africa, not in Mauritian startups.

Launch Africa, the largest local VC with 146 investments, and Compass (owned by ENL Group) are the exceptions. But as one VC managing partner noted bluntly: “VC is a game of scale and for startups whose only focus is the Mauritius market, it’s going to be hard for a VC to write a cheque for a business whose market is only 1.7 million at best.”

The capital exists in Mauritius—it’s just flowing through the country, not into it.

4. Limited Partners: Who Funds the Funds?

Estonia: Government as Cornerstone LP

SmartCap, Estonia’s government-backed fund-of-funds, has been transformative. With approximately €176 million in net value, SmartCap invests in private VC funds that focus on Estonia, essentially providing cornerstone capital that de-risks funds for other LPs.

The government has also launched specialized funds: a €100 million Green Fund for cleantech and a €100 million Defence Fund for dual-use technologies, backed by EU NextGenerationEU funding.

This public-private model attracts institutional investors who might otherwise overlook such a small market.

Mauritius: Limited LP Base

Mauritius lacks a robust institutional LP base. Without a critical mass of pension funds, family offices, or corporate venture arms investing in local VC funds, fund managers struggle to raise capital at scale.

The government provides some support through schemes like the Mauritius Research and Innovation Council (offering $2.62 million in grants), but this is grants, not LP investment in funds. There’s no SmartCap equivalent creating a sustainable fund-of-funds ecosystem

Who are the LPs? and how do we get more institutional capital onboard?

5. Exits: Proof of Concept Matters

Estonia: Track Record of Wins

Estonia’s exit history is its secret weapon:

  • Skype → eBay ($2.6B, 2005)
  • Playtech → IPO (became unicorn 2012)
  • Wise → London Stock Exchange IPO (2021, now valued at $11B)
  • Bolt → Preparing for IPO (valued at €8.4B)
  • Multiple acquisitions of mid-sized companies

These exits validate the ecosystem, return capital to investors (who reinvest), and create experienced entrepreneurs who mentor the next generation.

Notably, 2024 was challenging: Estonia saw an all-time low in new startup formation, partly because founders are waiting for better exit conditions. This highlights that even mature ecosystems need continuous exits to stay healthy.

Mauritius: Exit Desert

Mauritius has virtually no meaningful tech exits. Without success stories, there’s no proof of concept for investors, no capital returned to the ecosystem, and no experienced entrepreneurs to recycle back into the system.

This is perhaps the biggest structural problem: investors need to believe exits are possible before they’ll invest at scale.

6. Service Providers: The Connective Tissue

Estonia: 150+ Support Organizations

Estonia has built a comprehensive support infrastructure: 150+ organizations including tech incubators, accelerators, legal firms specializing in VC deals, accounting firms that understand startup economics, and PR agencies focused on tech companies.

Organizations like Startup Estonia act as ecosystem orchestrators, connecting founders with resources. The density means startups can find specialized help at every stage.

Mauritius: Building Infrastructure

Mauritius has initiatives like the Mauritius Africa FinTech Hub, theTurbine accelerator, and the Mauritius Emerging Technologies Council. But the ecosystem lacks depth.

The country has strong corporate service providers (CSPs) for fund domiciliation—Mauritius ranks first in Africa for fund domiciliation according to a 2024 MasterCard Foundation study—but these serve offshore clients, not local startups.

There’s a mismatch: world-class infrastructure for hosting African-focused funds, but insufficient startup-focused service providers.

7. Community & Education: Building the Pipeline

Estonia: Entrepreneurship as National Identity

Estonia has embedded entrepreneurship into its education system and national culture. Universities offer specialized programs in entrepreneurship. The e-Residency program has attracted 100,000+ digital entrepreneurs, creating a global community connected to Estonia.

The startup community is tight-knit—with only 1.3 million people, everyone knows everyone. This density creates serendipitous connections and knowledge sharing. Community events, from the Estonian Startup Ecosystem Annual Fireside Chat to countless meetups, keep the ecosystem connected.

Mauritius: Emerging Community

Mauritius has launched initiatives like VIT Mauritius offering AI and machine learning degrees (55% of students from other African countries), and various fintech training programs.

The Digital Mauritius 2030 Strategic Plan commits to certifying 10,000 AI professionals by 2030, with $50 million invested in STEM education.

But community density is still developing. With only 100+ tech startups versus Estonia’s 1,400, there aren’t enough peers for the network effects that create spontaneous collaboration and knowledge transfer.

Having the right networks matter.

8. Government: Policy Creates Possibilities

Estonia: Digital Government as Competitive Advantage

Estonia’s government doesn’t just support startups—it operates like a startup itself. 99% of government services are online. You can start a company in 15 minutes. Tax filing takes minutes. E-signatures are legally binding and universal.

The government offers:

  • E-Residency (allowing anyone globally to access Estonian business infrastructure)
  • Startup Visa (attracting foreign founders)
  • Tax incentives (reinvested corporate profits are untaxed)
  • Direct support through Startup Estonia and SmartCap

This isn’t about grants—it’s about removing friction and creating the world’s most efficient business environment.

Mauritius: Policies in Progress

Mauritius has made significant strides:

  • 8-year tax exemptions for innovation-driven startups (since 2017)
  • 5-year tax holiday for e-commerce and P2P lending
  • Regulatory Sandbox Licence for fintech/blockchain testing
  • National SME Incubator Scheme
  • Innovator Occupation Permit
  • Premium Visa for digital nomads

These are excellent policies. But implementation and ecosystem integration are still maturing. Mauritius is building the infrastructure Estonia built over 20 years—the question is whether it can accelerate the learning curve.

The Missing Link: Networks & Relationships

The VC Ecosystem Canvas shows all eight components connected by “Relationships, Networks & Connective Tissue.” This is where Estonia truly excels and Mauritius likely struggles.

Estonia’s ecosystem is densely interconnected. The Skype Mafia invested in Wise and Bolt founders. Successful entrepreneurs become angels and VCs. Founders who exit become mentors. Government officials have startup experience. Service providers are former operators.

Mauritius is building components in parallel, but they’re not yet tightly integrated. The financial services sector operates separately from the tech startup scene. International funds domiciled in Mauritius don’t invest locally. Government initiatives don’t always connect to on-the-ground founder needs.

Bring the network together.

Recommendations for Mauritius: Building on Strengths

Mauritius has unique advantages Estonia lacks: strategic location as Africa’s gateway, strong financial services infrastructure, political stability, and preferential access to Indian and African markets. Here’s how to leverage them:

1. Embrace the Africa Gateway Strategy

Stop competing with Estonia on their terms. Mauritius will never be “Africa’s Estonia”—but it can be “Africa’s Connector.”

Action: Incentivize all Mauritius-domiciled VC funds to invest at least 20% in Mauritian startups or African startups headquartered in Mauritius. This would be along the same lines we now see in places like Saudi and Ireland. Create tax incentives for this. Set up LP structures to back a wide number of funds, but having those funds allocated to local, regional startups.

2. Create a Government-Backed Angel Co-Investment Fund

The missing angel layer is killing the ecosystem at the source.

Action: Establish a $20 million government fund that co-invests 50/50 with private angels on tickets of $25,000-$200,000. This de-risks angel investment while building the angel community. Model it on Estonia’s SmartCap but focused on seed stage.

3. Launch “Mauritius Labs” – A Pan-African GP Accelerator

Build on your geographic advantage.

Action: Create a government-supported GP accelerator that brings 100 African Emerging Fund Mangers per year to Mauritius for 3-month programs. Provide work permits, working capital, warehousing, office space, and connections to Mauritius-domiciled LPs. GPs must maintain legal entities in Mauritius for 2 years. This creates dealflow, attracts talent, and positions Mauritius as Africa’s GP/LP hub. (pssss, don’t think this is possible, just look to Luxembourg’s ICFA. Don’t yet know what a GP accelerator is? Just look at some of our work here.)

ICFA, showing the path for Mauritius’s GP Accelerator

4. Mandate Ecosystem Participation for Fund Licensing

Use regulatory network to build connective tissue.

Action: Motivate all funds seeking Mauritius domiciliation to: (a) host quarterly office hours for local startups, (b) participate in local pitch events, (c) provide annual scholarships to Mauritian students. Turn the offshore financial sector into an engaged ecosystem participant.

5. Create “Exit Readiness” Infrastructure

Build confidence in exit possibilities.

Action: Establish partnerships with London Stock Exchange, NYSE, and major African exchanges for streamlined IPO processes for Mauritius-domiciled companies. Create a secondary market for startup shares to provide liquidity before full exits. Model this on Estonia’s cooperation with LSE that enabled Wise’s successful IPO.

6. Activate the Indian Ocean Diaspora

Estonia leveraged its global diaspora through e-Residency. Mauritius can do the same.

Action: Create an “Indian Ocean Innovation Network” connecting Mauritian diaspora in banking, tech, and business globally. Offer investment matching, board positions, and advisory roles. Many successful Mauritians abroad would invest in their home ecosystem if given structured opportunities.

7. Integrate Education with Ecosystem

VIT Mauritius is a start, but it needs tighter industry integration.

Action: Require all tech companies receiving government incentives to provide internships or mentorship. Create entrepreneurship tracks in all universities with real startup projects funded by the government. Make “one year working in a startup” a graduation requirement for business/CS students.

8. Focus Ruthlessly on Fintech & AI for Africa

Don’t try to compete in every sector—dominate two.

Action: Declare Mauritius “Africa’s Fintech & AI Capital.” Concentrate all resources (grants, accelerators, tax incentives, regulatory sandboxes) on these two verticals. Build critical mass through specialization before expanding. Estonia’s early focus on fintech (Wise, Bolt payments) created momentum that expanded to other sectors.


The Bottom Line

Estonia took 20 years to build its ecosystem, starting with Skype in 2003. Mauritius is essentially in year 5-7 of serious ecosystem building. The gap is real, but not insurmountable.

The key insight: Estonia didn’t succeed because of its size—it succeeded despite it. The same can be true for Mauritius, but only if it:

  1. Stops thinking domestically (force global mindset from day one)
  2. Leverages existing strengths (financial services, geographic position)
  3. Creates tight integration between all ecosystem components
  4. Focuses ruthlessly on 2-3 sectors rather than trying to do everything
  5. Builds for exits from the beginning
  6. Start with building the world’s leading GP accelerator – in Mauritius

The infrastructure is coming together. The government is supportive. The talent exists. What’s needed now is intentional ecosystem architecture—connecting the pieces, creating the flywheel, and proving that exits are possible.

Estonia has shown what’s possible with 1.3 million people. Mauritius has the same population, better weather, and a gateway to a continent of 1.3 billion people.

The question isn’t whether Mauritius can build a thriving VC ecosystem. The question is: how quickly can it learn from those who’ve already done it?


What do you think? Are there other lessons from successful small-nation ecosystems that Mauritius should consider? Share your thoughts in the comments.

#VentureCapital #Startups #Mauritius #Estonia #AfricaTech #Ecosystem #Innovation

Ever wondered how startups in MENA actually raise money? Let me walk you through the journey of Wiwo Bank – a fictive digital banking startup that went from napkin sketch to Series B in the region.

First, The Basics: Your Funding Toolkit

Before we dive into Wiwo’s story, let’s understand the three most common investment instruments you’ll encounter in MENA:

SAFE (Simple Agreement for Future Equity) Think of it as an IOU for shares. You get money now, investors get equity later (usually at your next priced round). Key term: valuation cap – the maximum company value at which the SAFE converts to equity. If the cap is $3M but your next round values you at $10M, early investors still convert at $3M (winning!). You can also expect to see discount rate (often 20% or more).

CLA (Convertible Loan Agreement) Similar to a SAFE, but it’s technically debt. It converts to equity later, but if things go south, investors have loan protections. Key terms: interest rate (usually 5-10%), discount rate (investors get shares cheaper than new investors), and maturity date (when the loan must convert or be repaid).

Equity The classic. Investors buy actual shares at an agreed company valuation. Key terms: valuation (what your company is worth), ownership % (how much you’re giving away), and liquidation preference (who gets paid first if you sell). Make sure to keep track of pre-money, post-money and all key terms.

Meet Wiwo Bank: From Living Room to Boardroom

The Beginning: Friends & Family ($50K)

Sarah, Khalid, and Noor quit their jobs at HSBC, Bain, and Microsoft to build Wiwo Bank – a digital banking platform to reinvent financial services in MENA. With $200K of their own savings and $50K from Sarah’s supportive brother on a SAFE, they built an MVP.

Structure: SAFE – brother got a stake in the company, no complicated terms. Conversion into equity in the future. No terms, no cap. No nothing on the SAFE. Just assume MFN.

Pre-Seed: The Kuwait Accelerator ($1M CLA)

Six months later, Wiwo’s MVP caught the eye of Brilliant Lab’s “Brilliant Start” program in Kuwait.

The deal: $1M as a Convertible Loan Agreement with a 10% interest rate and $3M cap. Minimum 10-month duration before conversion.

This CLA gave Wiwo runway to expand beyond Dubai while giving Brilliant Lab protection as a loan if things went sideways.

Seed Round: The Doha Angel ($300K SAFE)

With traction in Kuwait and Dubai, the team pitched in Doha. Al-Kuwari, an investor focused on healthcare and fintech, believed in their embedded finance vision.

The deal: $300K on a SAFE with a $3M valuation cap.

No valuation discussion, no equity calculation yet – just fast money to keep building. The cap meant Al-Kuwari would benefit hugely if Wiwo’s next round valued them higher.

Series A: The Accelerator Alumni Round ($250K + $600K)

By now, Wiwo had real revenue and was expanding to Jordan. Jordan’s Oasis500 came in with $250K at a $3M valuation (straight equity this time – real ownership).

Then VentureSouq knocked: $600K at $5M valuation post, but only if Wiwo joined a top-tier accelerator first. The team hustled into Plug & Play (no equity), and VentureSouq invested, taking 12%.

All those SAFEs and CLAs from earlier? They converted now. Brilliant Lab and Al-Kuwari’s instruments converted at their $3M caps, meaning they got more shares than if they’d invested at the $5M Series A valuation.

Series B: The Big Leagues ($25M)

Fast forward 18 months. Wiwo hit $50M ARR, became a serious Careem-for-banking story, and had a clear path to breakout growth. Mubadala’s $400M fintech fund came calling.

The deal: $25M at a $55M post-money valuation, but with grown-up terms: anti-dilution protection and 1.5X liquidation preference.

What does that mean? If Wiwo sells for $100M, Mubadala gets $37.5M first (1.5X their $25M), then everyone else splits the rest. It’s protection for late-stage investors betting big.

The Lessons

1. Structure matches stage: Friends write checks. Early investors want SAFE/CLA flexibility. Growth investors want equity with protections.

2. Caps matter: Wiwo’s early believers who bet on $3M caps made 8X more shares than if they’d waited for the $5M Series A.

3. Terms get serious: Notice how friends asked for nothing, but Mubadala wanted liquidation preferences? That’s the real-life at scale.

4. Geography shapes deals: MENA investors often require regional expansion commitments (Jordan for Oasis500, Kuwait for Brilliant Lab). It’s not just money – it’s market access.

Wiwo Bank isn’t real, but this journey is typical for MENA startups scaling from idea to growth stage. Whether you’re raising your first $50K or your first $50M, understanding these instruments isn’t optional – it’s essential.

Your turn:

If you have read this far, you are ready for the task. Try to structure the cap table based on the information given here to the best of your ability. It might not be as easy as you think. Assume the following:

  • Three founders
  • 100.000 shares at opening, equally split
  • Set up a 20% ESOP, pre-Series A
  • All valuations pre, unless otherwise specified.
  • Post your results in the comments

#MENA #Startups #VentureCapital #Fintech #Fundraising #ScaleUpMENA

Over the past six years, we have run approximately 500 Strategy Sims sessions with participants from around the world. From C-level executives in global organizations to executive education programs at top business schools, developing venture ecosystems in the Middle East, and backing startup founders with global ambitions, Strategy Sims have served as a powerful tool for learning, insight, and professional development.

But how does it work? What is the workflow that makes Strategy Sims work? And what can new leaders and faculty learn in applying the Strategy Sims method in action?

By: Chris Rangen

The Scale Up Angel Sim, a deeply immersive, engaging and competitive way to learn angel investing, @Tiye Angel Network, Cairo, Egypt, Oct 2023

What is Strategy Sims?

The Strategy Sims are designed to help organizations and individuals navigate complex strategic challenges, develop critical thinking, and simulate high-stakes decision-making. Strategy Sims are designed to build learning, mastery and company growth, using experiential learning. The structure is based on modern theories on adult learning, including the renowned Lego Serious Play method by Johan Roos and Bart Victor .

Rather than passively listening to lengthy lectures, we use a combination of pre-work, micro-lectures, team-based competitive experiential learning, in sum driving far deeper and effective learning and development. Feedback from participants emphasize three key points;

  • Engaging: people love the format of an experiential learning program (with a strong competitive streak)
  • Fast-paced learning: learning comes from every angle, with high-pace, micro-burst, and instant shift from ‘learning to doing’
  • Team: teamwork, and great teamwork is the key to a successful Strategy Sim session. Without it, any team will struggle. Hands-on leadership (people have formal leadership roles in the program) and strong team collaboration makes all the difference – just like in real life

“Intense”, “Exhilarating”, “Super insightful!”, “Weirdly realistic”, “Eye-opening”, “Hard, worth it”, “loved the experience – thank you!”, “Thank you for the craziest 3 days!”, said the 25+ participants we recently had at Fund Manager! Program for the Newton Venture Program.

Meet the nine Strategy Sims

The nine Strategy Sims cover a wide range of topics, industries, content and market conditions, allowing participants to experience real-world content at an accelerated pace. Most of the Strategy Sims are built around the concept of a team-based journey, taking a company from zero to exit (Scale Up!), or turning a company around from laggard to breakout leader (Transform!)

The nine Strategy Sims are:

Transform!: from laggard to breakout winner

For corporate users, leadership development, strategy, innovation, change management and executive education programs.

Scale Up! From idea to exit

For entrepreneurs, startups, scale ups, accelerators, incubators, VC Funds, and startup ecosystem development and entrepreneurship education.

Scale Up MENA! From idea to exit in the Middle East (launching 2025!)

For entrepreneurs, startups, scale ups, accelerators, incubators, VC funds and startup ecosystem development in the Middle East and North Africa, as well as entrepreneurship education.

Scale Up Angel! From Novice Investor to Super Angel

For angel investor networks, angel clubs, ecosystem development and education programs.

Scale Up X! Gender-based entrepreneurship

For female founders, female startup programs, gender-based entrepreneurship development

Supercluster!: Accelerating national transformation

For national transformation programs, innovation clusters, economic development, ecosystems and education programs.

Fund Manager!: From Thesis to DPI

For GP accelerators, venture capital training & education, fund manager development, VC funds, fund-of-funds, VC ecosystem development, LP training and education programs

Corporate Venture!: from innovation to value

For corporate venture teams, corporate strategy teams and education programs

VC Ecosystem: from emerging to outperforming (coming in 2026)

For VC ecosystem developers, international finance- and development organizations, government agencies, VC associations, national innovation agencies,  VC education programs

Scale Up! in action in the Middle East, @Tamkeen and Falak Innovation, Bahrain, April 2024

The Strategy Sims method

1. Client (Participants) Context

Understanding the participants’ context is crucial to delivering a relevant and engaging Strategy Sim. We begin by assessing what is top of mind for participants, the challenges they are facing, and the external factors influencing their industry.

For example, if a session is focused on strategic dynamics, we might ask: What are the implications of the current NATO rift and Europe’s sudden need to rearm? Should traditional European industrial companies expand into security and defense?

With defense spending on the rise, what should legacy companies do? Expanding Transform! to cover new strategy questions rapidly arising for (mostly) European firms in spring 2025.

If we are planning a Scale Up Masterclass, we might look at the current market for pre-seed, seed and venture-stage fundraising, we look at the latest deals and valuations and news in the market.

Meet over 500 real life investors, with terms sheet, SAFE notes and convertible structures from across the MENA region

By aligning the simulation with real-world contexts, we ensure that the experience is highly relevant and actionable.

2. Learning Goals

Each Strategy Sim is designed with specific learning goals in mind. These objectives vary based on the audience, program,  industry, and challenges they wish to address. Common learning goals include:

  • Understanding competitive strategy, leadership and transformation
  • Enhancing decision-making under uncertainty
  • Leadership during change and change management
  • Exploring business model innovation
  • Developing financial literacy and capital strategy
  • How to build a venture capital fund
  • How to raise startup financing?
  • How to improve national competitiveness
  • Mastering business angel investing
Transform! Puts participants into the shoes of a top management team, brought in to turn around a legacy company with declining sales, underperforming market cap and a culture strongly against change. Can the new management team successfully lead the  transformation, using the 10 Principles of Transformation?
The learning engine in Scale Up MENA!, our latest Strategy Sim, built entirely on MENA startup content. Startup teams need to master every key topic from equity setup, multi-stage financing, product development, market expansion, revenue growth (ARR) and exit negotiations, taking the company from early idea to a successful exit in just a few days.  March 2025
Detailed program for a 3-day Scale Up! Masterclass, for founders, accelerators and ecosystem builders, Sep 2024

3. Participant Outcomes

The success of a Strategy Sim is measured by the impact on participants. Key outcomes often include:

  • Improved strategic thinking and strategic leadership
  • Increased confidence in personal leadership during change management
  • Enhanced collaboration and robust teamwork
  • Greater confidence in making complex strategy decisions
  • Better equipped to raise one or multiple future fundraising rounds for founders
  • More confidence in building a venture capital firm
Upon completion of the Fund Manager Masterclass participants should be able to successfully understand and navigate the 10-15 year fund journey, January 2025

4. Selection of Strategy Sim

Choosing the right Strategy Sim depends on the participants,  learning goals and the client context. With nine unique simulations to date, it is easy for clients and executive educators to find and select just the right Strategy Sim.

Scale Up! Content deepdive, with an expanded focus on climate and cleantech. march 2022
Corporate Venture, a niche Strategy Sim, takes participants through the challenges of building a world-class corporate venture program. December 2024

5. Case Study

Each Strategy Sim is enriched with real-world case studies that provide practical insights into business strategies, industry shifts, and key decision points. These cases serve as a foundation for thinking, allowing participants to draw parallels between the simulation and real-life business challenges before stepping into Strategy Sim experience.

Fund Manager Case study, @Accenture, Frankfurt, March 2025
Want to dig deeper?

Read the full case study for Transform!, using the Mobility industry, at Duke University, April 2025.

6. Pre-Pack

Prior to the session, participants receive a pre-pack containing background materials, industry insights, and key frameworks to help them prepare. This ensures they enter the simulation with a solid understanding of the context and objectives. Some programs also run a 45. Minute webinar

For Transform, spring 2025, participants enjoy multiple classroom lectures, then receive:

Pre-session video, with an intro to corporate strategy & finance

  • Case study
  • Welcome brief from the Board chair
  • Team role descriptions
  • Management onboarding pack
  • Building the Transformational Company report
Management onboarding pack, BD team presenting how to create value by investing into Explore business models and doing CVC bolt-ons. Something for every new management team to reflect on, March 2025

For Fund Manager, spring 2025, participants receive:

  • Case study
  • Team role descriptions
  • Pre-session workbook, with core content intro and basic equity math for VC fund managers

Slidepack

  • Selected reading on ‘inside a VC fund’, and ‘how to set up a VC fund’
Pre-session workbook for Fund Manager, January 2024.
Want to dig deeper?

Read the BoD Chair Welcome Memo, Team roles and Management onboarding pack for Transform!, using the Mobility industry, at Duke University, April 2025.

7. Run the Strategy Sim

The core of the experience, the Strategy Sim itself, is an immersive, high-energy session where participants engage in competitive team work and dynamic decision-making. Depending on the chosen simulation, participants will:

  • Select team roles (you own your role during the program)
  • Formulate strategies (ambition, how to get there, how to win)
  • Compete against other teams (Collaborative, competitive, backstabbing?)
  • Respond to market shifts and external pressures (process information in real-time)
  • Manage resources and capital allocation (investments, divestment)
  • Negotiate deals and partnerships (alliances, take overs, hostile acquisitions?)
  • Build financial models, budgets and multiple presentations (average 4 presentations per program, up to 12 presentations in multi-day, complex programs)
  • Craft a plan to win (out compete the rest)
Classroom pitches at the Venture Asset Management Program, using Fund Manager, @IMD, Lausanne, Switzerland, September 2024.
Angels and founders collaborating on analyzing later stage investors, mapping them in the Investor Map, @Tiye Angels, Cairo, Egypt,  October 2023
Teamwork is key, four DNB Bankers going through the founder’s journey, here analyzing a term sheet from a Superinvestor, using Scale Up! @DNB, Oslo, Norway, October 2024.
Last minute merger negotiation between two teams, Transform @IE, Madrid. Inorganic growth through mergers, acquisitions and hostile take-overs are key to leapfrogging the competition. Leadership and dealmaking skills is vital here, May 2023

8. Select & celebrate the winner

Ultimately, every Strategy Sim session will end with a winner. In Scale Up! this is often the company that can achieve the best revenue, growth and exit transaction. In Transform! it is the first team to hit 50BN – or 100BN – market cap in public markets.

At IMD, for the Venture Asset Management Program, the winning fund, Circular Dragons achieved a 253X net DPI, but got stuck due to some highly questionable financial transactions, leaving room for BASA, fund III to secure the top spot, with a  188X net DPI, both massive outlier performances.

The fund Manager Masterclass – with 17 funds across 8 firms Fund Manager @IMD, September 2024

9. Debrief & Knowledge Transfer

Following the simulation, we conduct a structured debrief to help participants reflect on their decisions, analyse outcomes, and extract key lessons. This step ensures that insights gained during the session translate into practical applications.

For the different Strategy Sims, a variety of debrief tools and methods are used.

Updated debrief format, using the Transform! 12, February 2025
Want to dig deeper?

Read the full Transform! 12 Leadership Skills: assessment.

10. Bringing Back Into Real Life

The final step in the Strategy Sims method is ensuring that the learnings are integrated into real-world business contexts. Participants leave with new strategic action plans, new perspectives on their leadership and future development, and a framework for applying their hard-won insights to their own organizations.

For corporate leaders, new innovation strategy, new financial insights and a clear transformation roadmap are common ‘action points’. For founders, accelerators and ecosystems, clear action plans for scaling up, growth and successful fundraising. For emerging fund managers, a clear understanding for the path to Fund III, deeper appreciation for paths to liquidity and exits, and of course, how to accelerate LP fundraising, are all common take aways.

Fund Managers from across Africa in the Fund Manager, @2X Global, Johannesburg, March 2024

Conclusion

The Strategy Sims method is a proven approach to experiential learning, strategic decision-making, and business model innovation. Whether used by corporate leaders, startup founders, or venture capitalists, Strategy Sims provide a powerful way to navigate complexity, test strategies, and drive successful outcomes.

Currently used in executive education programs, MBA & Master programs, ecosystem development programs, VC development, startup- and acceleration programs, large-scale corporate transformation projects, national competitiveness projects; Strategy Sims can be a superb value add to your programs in classrooms and board rooms worldwide.

Do you want to explore how to bring Strategy Sims into your organization, classroom or practice?

Join 100’s of organizations around the world in accelerating learning, drive performance and achieve successful impact.

Become a globally certified Strategy Tools Master Trainer?

Read more or get in touch with us today.

Over the last 5 years I’ve had the unique opportunity to work with 250+ emerging fund managers across a wide range of programs, masterclasses, GP accelerators and coaching sessions. Funds have ranged from seed, venture, growth, SME, debt and PE. Geographies have ranged from Europe, MENA, Africa, APAC and the Americas.

In doing so, I’ve tried to pin down, what are core questions, I as a guide can use to support my emerging managers?

The Three Questions

Question 1: Have you ever made any investments in this strategy?

If so, can you talk me through the process? How did you perform? What did you learn?

Question 2: Have you ever worked at a fund or managed a fund?

If so, what were your primary deliverables? What did you achieve? What did you learn?

Question 3: Have you ever, personally, raised capital for a fund or a startup?

If so, what was your experience? What did you learn? How does that experience shape your thinking about fundraising for your own fund?

Why These Three Questions Matter

These questions serve as a diagnostic framework that reveals the depth of an emerging fund manager’s practical experience across the three core competencies required for fund management success: investment executionoperational expertise, and capital raising.

Each question probes a different dimension of readiness. The first explores whether they understand the mechanics of deploying capital and generating returns. The second examines their institutional knowledge of fund operations, from due diligence processes to portfolio management. The third assesses their appreciation for the challenges of fundraising and LP relationship management.

Together, these questions help me quickly identify where an emerging manager sits on the experience spectrum and what gaps need to be addressed in their journey toward launching a successful fund.

How Emerging Fund Managers Answer These Questions

The responses typically fall into several patterns:

The Experienced Operator: These managers usually have strong answers to questions 1 and 2, often drawing from years at established funds or corporate ventures. They can articulate specific investment processes and operational frameworks but may struggle with question 3, having never been on the fundraising side.

The Entrepreneur-Turned-Investor: These individuals excel at question 3, bringing deep empathy for founders and understanding of capital needs. However, they often have limited experience with questions 1 and 2, particularly around institutional investment processes and fund operations.

The Complete Novice: Some emerging managers have limited experience across all three areas. While this presents the steepest learning curve, it also represents the greatest opportunity for growth when paired with proper mentorship and structured learning.

The Industry Expert: These managers may have deep sector knowledge but limited hands-on investment experience. They typically perform well on the analytical aspects of question 1 but may lack practical deployment experience.

Case Studies

All case studies are anonymized, but based on one or more real-life emerging managers I’ve been lucky enough to work with.

Case Study A: Paal – Nordic Cleantech Fund

Paal approached me with plans to launch a €25M cleantech seed fund across the Nordics. His background was compelling—a former climate tech engineer turned sustainability consultant with extensive networks across Scandinavia’s green tech ecosystem.

Question 1 Response: Paal had made three angel investments over two years, all in Nordic cleantech startups. One had achieved a 3x return through acquisition, another had grown 200% in valuation, and the third was struggling. He could articulate his investment thesis clearly and had learned valuable lessons about the importance of regulatory tailwinds and customer validation in cleantech.

Question 2 Response: He had never worked at a fund but had served on two startup boards and helped design investment frameworks for a family office. His operational experience was limited to advisory roles, though he understood startup challenges intimately.

Question 3 Response: Paal had raised €500K for his own sustainability consulting firm and had a minor role in helping two portfolio companies raise follow-on rounds. He understood the founder’s perspective but had never experienced institutional fundraising.

Outcome: Paal’s limited investment track record but deep sector expertise made him an medium-attractive emerging manager.

We focused our conversations on understanding the fund’s business model, fund operations and LP relationship management. Two questions emerged here: one, how he could build a team to complement his skills, two, whether a fund vehicle truly was something for him.

As a part of the business model puzzle, we used the GP Working Capital Map to identify and discuss various ways he could finance the investment firm.

Case Study B: Aisha – UAE Fintech Fund

Aisha came from 8 years at a leading Middle Eastern bank, most recently as head of digital innovation. Previously, she held a junior role at a regional fund-of-fund. She proposed launching a $15M fintech fund targeting the UAE and broader GCC region, with a longer-term view on building a lasting investment firm.

Question 1 Response: Through her corporate role, Aisha had led strategic investments in five fintech startups, totaling $8M. Two investments had generated positive returns, and she maintained strong relationships with founders. However, these were strategic investments with different success metrics than financial returns.

Question 2 Response: While not at a traditional fund, Aisha had managed the bank’s innovation lab with a $20M annual budget. She understood due diligence, portfolio management, and had experience working with external fund managers on co-investments.

Question 3 Response: Aisha had never personally raised external capital but had some experience evaluating fund managers and understanding LP expectations from the LP side. One of her biggest gaps was simply understanding who her target ‘customers’ (LPs) were, how they made decisions and what the LP process looked like, ranging from hours to years, depending on the various LPs.

Outcome: Aisha’s banking experience and regional network positioned her well. Our conversations focused on transitioning from strategic to financial investing and developing fundraising skills. Notably, we spent time on mapping out LP personas, their decision making process and running this through the LP Process Canvas.

Case Study C: Priya – Thailand B2B SaaS Fund

Priya brought over 20 years of finance experience, including a decade at Development Finance Institutions (DFIs) across the US and Asia, with her most recent two years as a senior consultant to the International Finance Corporation (IFC). She proposed a $25M B2B SaaS fund focused on Thailand and Vietnam, targeting the growing digital transformation market in Southeast Asia.

Question 1 Response: Priya had extensive investment experience through her DFI roles, having deployed over $150M in development finance across 40+ transactions in Asia. However, most of these were infrastructure, financial inclusion, and SME financing deals. Her direct venture/tech investment experience was limited to three angel investments in Thai fintech and SaaS startups over the past five years, with mixed results. She understood institutional investment processes deeply but was adapting her framework to early-stage tech investing.

Question 2 Response: Her decade at DFIs provided substantial fund management experience, including portfolio oversight, due diligence leadership, and working with diverse stakeholder groups. At IFC, she had managed relationships with fund managers and co-investment programs. However, her experience was primarily in development finance rather than commercial venture capital, requiring adjustment to different risk profiles and return expectations.

Question 3 Response: Priya had extensive capital markets experience from the institutional side, having helped structure and raise funding for multiple DFI initiatives and worked closely with sovereign wealth funds and development banks. She understood LP motivations and fund structures intimately, though from the allocator rather than fund manager perspective. Her IFC experience included evaluating hundreds of fund managers, giving her deep insights into what LPs sought in emerging managers.

Outcome: Priya’s institutional credibility and extensive emerging markets experience made her a strong proposition for impact-focused LPs and DFIs, but also showed the challenges in unlocking new LP networks.

Our conversations focused on transitioning from development finance to commercial returns, understanding venture capital market dynamics, portfolio mark-ups, valuation methods and positioning her unique LP value proposition. Most importantly, we explored how to use the LP Stack to access new LP categories.

Insights I Gain From These Three Questions

These questions consistently reveal several key insights about emerging fund managers:

Track Record Depth: Managers with meaningful answers to question 1 typically have higher success rates in fundraising and early portfolio performance. Even a small number of investments provides crucial pattern recognition.

Operational Readiness: Question 2 reveals whether managers understand the operational complexity of running a fund, including meeting various LP requirements. Those with institutional experience build better fund management processes, including interactions with service providers.

Fundraising Realism: Question 3 often exposes unrealistic expectations about the fundraising process. Managers who have experienced fundraising from either side tend to build more realistic timelines and strategies. Emerging managers with limited experience tend to lack a structured fundraising process and often struggle to hit closing targets.

Development Priorities: The framework immediately highlights where coaching should focus, enabling more targeted and efficient preparation programs.

Recommendations for Emerging Fund Managers

Based on patterns observed across hundreds of conversations with these three questions, here are my key recommendations:

If you have limited investment experience (weak question 1 response):

  • Start angel investing immediately in your target sector
  • Join angel groups or syndicates to observe processes
  • Consider beginning in a more junior role at an established fund
  • Write up detailed investment memos to build experience
  • Suggested book to read: Venture Deals

If you lack operational fund experience (weak question 2 response):

If you haven’t raised capital (weak question 3 response):

  • Help companies with their fundraising processes (including any of your own portfolio companies)
  • Study successful fund marketing materials and strategies
  • Build relationships with potential LPs before you need them
  • Consider joining an existing fund in a dedicated capital formation role for 2-4 years
  • Suggested book to read: The Business of Venture Capital

Universal recommendations:

  • Be honest about your experience gaps
  • Build complementary teams that cover all three competencies
  • Start networking with LPs 24-36 months before launching fundraising
  • Develop a differentiated investment thesis based on your unique insights and access

The journey from aspiration to successful fund manager is exceptionally challenging but also achievable. Less than 25% of those that start actually make it. Out of these, just 66% make it to a successful fund III.

These three questions provide a roadmap for understanding where you are and what you need to develop. The most successful emerging managers I’ve worked with embrace their learning journey and systematically address gaps in their experience while building on their unique strengths.

Remember: every experienced fund manager was once emerging. The key is honest self-assessment, targeted development, combined with grit, hard work and execution toward your ultimate fund vision.

Good luck on your emerging fund manager story

Five Future Scenarios for the VC Ecosystem in MENA

So, what is possibly next for the dynamic ecosystem in MENA? Having spent the week deep in conversations and panels, it is clear that there is a strong, optimistic momentum. Most people I’ve met have been clear on the future potential for growth and expansion.

Taking lessons from other rapidly developing VC ecosystems, we have seen that developments can take different paths. Driven by market swings, interest rates, investor moods, geopolitical instability, talent flows, government priorities and black swan events, the next 7 years in the region could take different paths. We have identified five possible future paths for the region.

#1 “Disappointing” ($1BN- 1,5BN deployed annually by 2033)

“It was a great ride, but didn’t last”, “It was bleep“ or “the euphoria of 2021-2025 was replaced by a slower, more careful approach”. In this scenario, the market would stabilize around a $1BN – $1,5BN in annual capital deployed, and a lot of the momentum of the last few years would fizzle out. Accelerators would shut down. Government-backed fund-of-funds would leave the market and many overseas fund would pull out. We have seen such a scenario play out in other ecosystems in recent years, with Norway being one such example. Given what I’ve witnessed over the past week, I consider this a highly unlikely scenario, possibly only caused by massive corrections in the global VC market. It is, I hope, a scenario will not emerge.

#2 “Unrealized Potential” ($3BN deployed annually by 2033)

“What happened, the region had such a potential?”, “It has really slowed down” or “well, not much new is happening”. In this second scenario, the market would stabilize around $3BN capital deployed, and continue to hover around the same level of activity as today. Few, if any, new funds would come in, and few growth funds would ever get into the market. Local investors and fund-of-funds would continue to support the ecosystem, but there would be a clear feeling of ‘we could have been so much more’. In this scenario, the lack of return and liquidity coupled with a declining interest from limited partners, would leave the ecosystem more or less ‘as is’, with the pioneering General Partners and ecosystem builders continuing to push forward, but the ecosystem unable or unwilling to join in.

Overall, most would agree that there was so much potential, but it did not quite pan out.

Again, I would consider this scenario as highly unlikely, due to the combined efforts and government leadership I’ve witnessed this week.

#3 “Growth, Maturing” ($4BN deployed annually by 2033)

“MENA continues to evolve”, “MENA’s ecosystem is maturing” or “Slow and steady entrepreneurial growth”. Maybe a lack of ambition in local founders, maybe limited entrepreneurial talent or a limited interest in growth-stage financing; but in this scenario, the region would continue to do well, grow and expand. Yet, the growth would be slowing and the incredible 7,5X growth seen over the past 7 years, would be replaced by a slower, more maturing phase.

New funds would be raised, new managers would enter the market and new LPs would be investing into venture, but everywhere, there would be an unsettling feeling that the market was reaching a natural plateau.

$4BN would be deployed in the market annually, a nice step up from the $3BN back in 2025, but at the same time, significantly below what the early pioneers would have hoped for.

This scenario is plausible, maybe even likely, but given the momentum I’ve seen, I struggle to believe this to be a probable outcome. Should the global venture capital market face a new, major downturn, maybe, but not likely.

#4 “Overshooting Expectations” ($10BN deployed annually by 2033)

“MENA is truly outperforming”, “Continue to leapfrog” or “LPs need to be invested into MENA”. In this scenario, the successful growth from 2017 to 2025 would continue, albeit at a slower pace. Massive amounts of new capital would be injected into the market, maybe even distorting valuations. The current $950M series B gap would vanish, and later stages, series C and D, would become high-growth stages in the region.

Exit markets would blossom, creating multiple paths to liquidity for founders, early employees and LPs alike. In turn, creating a massive wave of liquidity across the region. Funds raised in 2021-2024 would see record-high liquidity options and delivering overperforming DPI’s back to their LPs. This would in turn make it far easier for the GPs to raise new funds, from the same LPs, ranging from pre-seed to late growth. Firms like BECO Capital could suddenly raise seed-funds and late growth funds in the same vintage, maybe closing new funds with $2BN – $4BN in 2030-2031. Early movers like MEVP would be announcing Fund VIII, and a massive number of emerging GPs would come to market with innovative fund structures, new strategies and new networks. In this scenario, the region would begin to see a wave of wealth being created by young entrepreneurs and their earliest employees, through extensive use of ESOP structures.

While somewhat optimistic, I consider this a plausible scenario. We might not see the full $10BN target hit by 2033, but with a combination of luck, leadership and wide ecosystem collaboration, this scenario is not unlikely.  Such a scenario would place the MENA region closer to the UK ($12BN – $18BN) and on par with Singapore ($6BN – $10BN).

#5 “Wild Ride” ($21BN deployed annually by 2033)

“MENA is booming”, “MENA is becoming a global leader in venture capital” and “record growth in new successful listings”. In our outlier scenario, the region continues with another round of 7X growth, easily sprinting past the United Kingdom, to become the 3rd region globally behind US and China. In this scenario, the region would be firing on every cylinder, from pumping out ambitious, high-growth founders from  a record number of accelerator programs to launching new first-time funds to seeing the more established players raising multiple growth funds. Limited partners from around the world would be looking to get into the best funds, and regional exchanges would be ramping up their pre-IPO programs to attract the best companies to list with them.

Organizations like MEVCA would become centers of attention, helping industry and government collaborate on developing the wider entrepreneurial ecosystem. Talent shortage for the industry would become a real issue, leading to numerous venture capital education and training programs. A record number of emerging funds would be launched, many with talent who had a couple of years in a larger fund, only to break out and launch their own firms at a young age. The region would shift from early-stage focus and center more attention on the total “lab to listing journey”, developing a number of late-stage initiatives, most with great success. For entrepreneurs and LPs alike, a record amount of liquidity would come out of the region, with an expected $52BN of liquidity coming back into the ecosystem.

While this scenario has a lower probability, we can not completely disregard it. This scenario would place the region on par with New York, and truly cement is position as a capital of capital. Could this happen? Yes. Would it require a combination of strategic leadership, luck and coherent ecosystem development? Absolutely.

What’s your scenario?

In mapping out these five scenarios, we present five different futures for the  VC ecosystem in the region. All are plausible. Some are not at all attractive. One is exceptionally ambitions. Yet, I find the people and policies to point toward the higher outcomes.

In a few years, we will see where the global market and the regional ecosystem are moving. Hopefully, for my friends and ecosystem builders in the region, the next 7 years will be equally exciting and rewarding as the past 7 years have been.

What do you think? What is your plausible and probable scenarios? I’d welcome your comments and views in the comments.

Expert view

“MENA VC in the next 10 years:

1. We will see several blue-chip Silicon Valley fund managers set up in the region to pursue emerging markets VC strategies from a base in either UAE or KSA,

2. Half of today’s regional VC firms will no longer be around;

3. Globally scalable VC-backed businesses will have either been founded here or will have moved here attracted by a number of ‘pull’ factors that will give them an edge over their competitors in more regulated or higher-friction markets

4. North American academic institutions will have established more campuses with well-funded STEM R&D capabilities and we will see IP rich businesses starting to emerge from this region with more regional money in deep tech”

– Abdullah Mutawi, Venture Capital Lawyer, Partner, Head of Corporate, Taylor Wessing.

Closing remarks

Writing this, I am preparing to fly out of Abu Dhabi and back to Europe (next week, Nairobi, Kenya). The week in MENA has given much food for thought. I’ve had the pleasure of spending hours and hours in deep conversation with leaders, innovators, fund managers ecosystem builders and capital allocators. I come away impressed. There is an air of ambition, optimism and future growth. I am looking forward to following the region’s development the coming years and cheering on fund managers, chief exit officers and entrepreneurial leaders across the ecosystem.

Learn more

Want to learn more about our ongoing research on venture capital ecosystems? Sign up for our upcoming report, Scaling Venture Capital Ecosystems or get in touch.

Enjoyed this article, got views, even opposing views or factual corrections? We welcome your thoughts and input in the comment field or by e-mail.