Over the past seven years we have delivered 300+ sessions with nearly 4.500 people through Scale Up! This month, we are rolling out the latest version, Scale Up MENA! and Scale Up Africa Rising! (launching in Q1 ’26). Here are the first observations from running the next generation of Scale Up!
It was one of the most intense, exhilarating and engaging Scale Up! sessions we’ve run in Norway (and we’ve run 60+ to date). The 30+ participants were highly capable. Angel investors, accelerator managers, ecosystem builders, founders, early-stage investors; all coming together to work on the ‘scaling up’ part of the ecosystem.
“Are you ready to scale?”, we asked, “do you have what it takes to scale from Bergen, Norway to the world?”, we challenges them. And they stepped up – big time, scaling five tech companies across energy, health, AI and seafood, ultimately ending up with a string of highly successful M&A exit transactions – and a string of zoo animals along the way.
Here are the top differences we observed in the new version of Scale Up! this week.
From financing to all round founder leadership and scaling development
The single biggest difference is the need for world class leadership and team collaboration. The moment the CEO steps back, the team steps down. The moment the Investor Relations Manager zoom out, the investor pipeline dries up in minutes. Leadership, more than ever, matters.
Got scale up leadership?
From equity to value
Previous generations of Scale Up! have largely been equity focused. Now, suddenly, ARR, revenue, revenue growth, margin expansion, building out the sales organization and revenue velocity matter. But beware of the famous year 10 hockey stick!
Look, year 10!
From investor landscape to commercial markets
With 35 markets to choose from, teams need to carefully select their beachhead and growth markets.
From linear to multi-level complexity
Five team members, each with a unique role, responsibility, KPIs, cards, boards and management dashboard.
is your workflow ready to scale?
Why it matters?
Globally, countries are competing on entreprenurship. But too often, the focus is on top-of-the-funnel, early-stage entreprenurship. Incubators filled, not IPO’s realized is often the metric of success. We developed Scale Up! to support more founders, innovation agencies, accelerators, ecosystems and countries in their efforts to scale, to scale up!
To date, nearly 4.500 people across 50 countries and 300+ programs have been through Scale Up! Globally, 50+ people are trained and certified to deliver Scale Up! programs. This month, we are training another 40 future facilitators.
This month, we are also rolling out Scale Up MENA! (from idea to exit in the Middle East) and getting ready to launch Scale Up Africa Rising! (from idea to exit in Africa). Next year, we are working on another two new outlines…..
Tomorrow, we’re off to Saudi Arabia and Dubai, where we will be running five Scale Up MENA! Masterclasses.
Are you heading into one of our upcoming Scale Up MENA! Masterclasses? In that case, you might want to explore the wonders of cap table management first. Think about this as a soft warm-up exercise.
Cap tables matter
Cap tables are the backbone of any successful startup scaling into a long-term successful winner. But, along the way, founders are likely to raise 5 – 15 rounds of financing, including SAFE, CLA, Equity, Debt, RVB and Project financing. How to keep track of it all? Your cap table.
Try your skills
Leading up to the Scale Up MENA! masterclasses, we have set up a super simple, yet complex exercise for anyone to test their cap table skills.
Meet MedAssist
Here is MedAssist, a fictive case company based in MENA. Your job, guide them through five round of early-stage financing. Make the investments. Update the cap table as needed. Below are 15 early-stage mini-term sheets, based on terms you might likely see at each stage. These are based on market standards in the region.
For any requirements, just make the reasonable assumption that you have these requirements in place as you proceed. For revenue and ARR, the number is listed as you progress below.
For initial set up of the cap table. Assume you have five founders, each owning 20% each. A total of 100.000 shares, at $5 per share, equal split amongst the team. There is no vesting in place and no ESOP in place – yet.
Meet MedAssist. Can you run their cap table over five rounds?
Round 1: Idea round (friends and family)
First round has three early family members interested. Which one or ones would you choose? What would be the preferred investment instrument? At this stage, MedAssist is pre-revenue.
We all love friends and family rounds. Who would you go for here?
Round 2: Pre-seed round (business angels)
Months go by, and angel investors are lining up for the pre-seed round. With 300.000 in early revenue, the momentum is growing. Would Alex Angels, DAN or Fatima be a better fit? or maybe all of them?
Angels, angels, whom to choose?
Round 3: Seed round (accelerators)
Post angels, local accelerators are next. Sanabil 500, RAK or Startup Bootcamp are all great programs. Yet, in our example, also offering very different terms. Who would you go with?
Accelerators are key players in the ecosystem. Should you attend all of them?
Round 4: Seed+ round (early VCs)
Revenue tips the magic $1M mark. Things are looking up. VCs come around for early coffee. Note, they all want various forms of market traction and progress. Let’s just assume you already have the Dubai Market Expansion card here.
VCs are the stepping stone to larger rounds….often led by regional funds.
Round 5: Small Series A (VCs)
Ah, our final round, a small Series A. With revenue at $1.9M, we are above the classic $1M mark, but still below the new, $3M ARR milestone for a “real Series A”. With strong interest now from ADQ, SB and HG, who would you choose to work with here?
Later stage investors often tie valuations to ARR multiples. Get used to it. ARR matters….
Cap table management
Ok, you have the story, you have the data. Now, can you run up the cap table?
Assume five founders, 20.000 shares each, entry at 5 per share. You take it from there. Good luck – and post your cap table in the comment.
Welcome to Scale Up MENA! Masterclass
If you enjoyed – and have completed – our little MedAssist task, you should be ready for the upcoming Scale Up MENA! Masterclass. Globally, more than 4.000 founders, investors, VCs, family offices, sovereign wealth fund investment officers, accelerators, bankers, board members, angel investors, climate funds, consulting companies, foundations, innovation agencies, ministries, students and educators have all built their founder skills and cap table skills with Scale Up!
Now, we are excited to launch the Scale Up MENA! Masterclass, 100% tuned into the realities of fundraising in the Middle East and North Africa. Based on 12+ months of research and 15+ years with early-stage investment experience, Scale Up MENA! Masterclass lets you build out your fundraising skills, cap table skills and overall scale up leadership skills in just hours.
https://i1.wp.com/www.engage-innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1762084915907.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=17201280Christian Rangenhttps://www.engage-innovate.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/engage-innovate-logo-main-header-1-300x157.pngChristian Rangen2025-11-06 19:11:592026-05-01 19:13:18Can you run MedAssist’s Cap Table?
Over the years, we have run more than 200 unique Scale Up! sessions globally. From 3-hour discovery sessions to 4-week investment readiness programs and everything in between. We’ve had thousands of founders, investors, ecosystem builders, government officials, and faculty join in.
Here are the 10 steps we believe are important for a winning Scale Up! session.
Step 1: Be Clear About the Format
Are we running a 3-hour discovery session? A half-day teaching session? One day? Maybe a 4-week program?
Get crystal clear on the format from the start. The structure dictates everything else—your content depth, your pacing, your materials, and what outcomes you can realistically achieve. Don’t try to squeeze a 4-week program into a half day, and don’t stretch a 3-hour session into something it’s not meant to be.
Scale Up Masterclass, InnovateBC, BC, Canada, 2025
Step 2: Know Your Participants
It’s really important that you understand who your audience is going to be. You need to understand their level, their background, their investment readiness, any previous programs they’ve completed, and who they are as individuals.
As much as possible, you want to review their decks and review their websites before you meet. This preparation makes all the difference between a generic session and one that truly resonates.
Anyone can take on the Outcome Canvas and present investor sensitivity analysis in just minutes, right?
Step 3: Align on Expectations
Here, you need to make sure that you deeply, deeply understand the expectations of your clients. And make sure you understand the expectations of the participants.
If you’re not sure about the expectations of the participants, communicate, communicate, communicate in advance. Make sure that expectations are what you want them to be—nothing else. Misaligned expectations are the fastest way to derail an otherwise excellent session
Accelerator managers turned founders for 48 hours, realizing that being a founder is harder than anyone had ever told them…… London, 2023
Step 4: Focus on the Journey
Now you want to bring out the Founder’s Journey Canvas and make sure that you craft your story and your communication around that journey. This is essential to the program. Make sure you can easily overlay each step with the right investment instrument, right investment terms and right valuations.
Navigating the Founder’s Journey. Can you structure the instruments, the terms and valuations?
The journey provides the narrative thread that holds everything together and helps participants see where they are, where they’re going, and what they need to get there.
Different participants have different journeys, but everyone follows the Founder’s Journey. Scale Up Masterclass, Cairo, Egypt, 2023
Step 5: Prepare (with Your Co-Facilitators)
We cannot emphasize this enough.
You might be delivering this by yourself. You might be delivering it with others. You might be delivering it with someone for the first time. Regardless, you need to spend as much time as needed to get aligned and prepared together.
Run through the flow. Discuss handoffs. Clarify who leads what. Iron out any differences in approach. The investment you make here pays dividends when you’re in the room with participants.
Deep team prep; pre- and post-session. Cairo, 2023
Step 6: Layout the Detailed Workflow
As part of Step 5, you need to lay out exactly the detailed step-by-step-by-step-by-step.
What are we going to do? Who does what? Who prepares what? Which canvases? Which founder tasks? Which breakouts? Which overnight assignments?
Leave nothing to chance. The more detailed your workflow, the smoother your delivery will be.
Step 7: Venue
Make sure you can access the venue at the time that you expect.
We strongly recommend setting up the venue the night before, including all the materials. If that’s not possible, try to get there 2 hours before you start in the morning and set up.
Murphy’s Law applies 800 times over when it comes to venues. The projector won’t work. The Wi-Fi will fail. The room setup will be wrong. There are no tables. Build in buffer time to handle these inevitable issues.
Step 8: Focus on the Cap Table
You have to make sure that you and your co-facilitators are up to speed on all things cap table.
Whether you choose to go with the paper version, the local host Excel version, the simple Google Sheets, or the full-on CFO Management dashboard—you have to be comfortable with the cap table.
It might need a couple of hours, a couple of days, or a couple of weeks of training to get there. Don’t skip this step. Cap table confusion kills the experience.
Teaching cap table 101, but quickly getting into the deep end of 3.2X liq.pref and anti-dilution measures. Cairo, Egypt 2023On day 1, you might want to go into SAFE conversion scenarios, maybe? Egypt, 2024…but on day 3, you can expect to see stuff like this Series C led by PIF with participation from Bessemer and Mubadala to hit a 925M post-money valuation. Scale Up MENA!, 2025
Step 9: Keep High Pace, Keep High Energy
Now you’ve started, you’re up and running, you have the participants in the room.
Make sure that you keep your pace and keep your energy. Push them. Push them. Push them.
This is the real-life experience we want them to have. Startups don’t move slowly, and neither should your session. Give them the pitch deck Founder Task. Equip them with Investor update presentations. Push them into Outcome presentations and maybe even the Board IPO readiness deck. Make them work, make them present – and always keep the energy full on.
DNB Banker leading HyperCare to IPO, Oslo, Norway, 2023
Step 10: Run an Exit Transaction
You’re now at the end of the program and you’re selecting a winner. Make sure you go through an exit transaction of some sort.
In the worst case, it’s basically “Congratulations, you’re acquired by Microsoft.” But there are many great exit scenarios you can run. Study them and
For everyone except the very most basic groups, run a proper exit scenario. If you have a really basic group, you can make up whatever you need for finding a winner. But make sure you have a clean cap table and a good exit transaction of some sort.
Four exit paths, all leading to M&As. Which one would you choose – if you could?The post-Series C M&A transaction that gave early Angels 125X MOIC, with Wamda taking home a 12,5X and PIF doubling their investment in mere months.
The Golden Rule: Always Tie It Back to Real Life
Finally, and this applies throughout the entire session: make sure that you constantly, always, always, always tie it back to real life.
As you’re going through the content, as you’re going through the stories, make sure to ask: How would this work in real life? What would be the equivalent in real life? How would you solve this in real life?
Because it’s not about the simulation. It’s about building skills for real life.
30+ accelerator managers and innovation consultants, building their skills with Scale Up! London, 2023
These ten steps have been refined through 200+ sessions across the globe. They work because they’re grounded in what actually happens when you bring founders, investors, and ecosystem builders together in a room and push them to think, decide, and act like they would in the real world.
Want to learn more about running Scale Up! sessions & Masterclasses? We deliver programs globally, by partnering with ecosystem builders, innovation agencies, ministries, accelerators, business schools, VC firms and anyone building the future of the startup ecosystem.
What is a ‘good cap table’? How have we trained 4,000+ participants on cap tables to date and how can new trainers become masters of cap tables?
Over the coming 12 months we expect to train and certify 30-60 Scale Up Train-the-trainers. These range from accelerator managers, business school faculty, VCs and program managers at large, global entrepreneurship programs. Yet, what they all will face is the joy, the struggle and the complexity of ‘the cap table’.
Here is a short overview on the four most common cap table tools we use in Scale Up!
Term sheets, term sheets everywhere….
What is a ‘cap table’?
A capitalization table – or ‘cap table’ – is the living, breathing record of who owns what in your company. It tracks equity ownership across all shareholders, from founders and employees to angels, VCs, and convertible note holders. Think of it as the financial DNA of your startup.
At its core, a cap table shows the percentage ownership, the number of shares, and the type of securities each stakeholder holds. But it is far more than a static spreadsheet. A well-maintained cap table tells the story of your fundraising journey – every investment round, every SAFE conversion, every option grant to key hires. It reveals who has voting rights, who gets paid first in an exit, and how much dilution founders experience as they scale.
In Scale Up!, we have seen hundreds of teams wrestle with their cap tables. The ones who master it early gain a strategic advantage. The ones who treat it as an afterthought often face painful surprises down the road – discovering they have given away too much, structured deals poorly, or created complex messes that scare off sophisticated investors.
Why good cap table management matters?
Poor cap table management is one of the silent killers of startups. We have watched promising companies stumble not because their product failed or their market disappeared, but because their cap table became an unsolvable puzzle.
First, investors care deeply about cap table cleanliness. A messy cap table signals operational immaturity. When a Series A investor sees dozens of small angel investments, confusing SAFE terms, or founder equity splits that don’t make sense, they start asking harder questions. Some walk away entirely. In fact, based on our work with VCs across three continents, cap table issues rank among the top five deal-breakers in early-stage investments.
Second, cap table mistakes compound over time. That generous equity grant to your first employee? That SAFE with a low valuation cap? These decisions ripple through every subsequent round, affecting dilution, control, and exit economics. We have seen founding teams who, after three rounds of funding, own less than 20% of their company – leaving little incentive to keep building.
Third, transparency matters. A well-managed cap table builds trust with your team and investors. Everyone knows where they stand. Employees can model their option value. Investors can track their returns. Founders can make informed decisions about future raises. When we run Scale Up! sessions, the teams that maintain real-time cap table accuracy consistently outperform those who don’t – they make faster decisions, spot problems earlier, and negotiate better terms.
Finally, your cap table becomes critical during exits. Whether it is an acquisition, IPO, or secondary sale, the cap table determines who gets what. Liquidation preferences, anti-dilution clauses, and participation rights all flow from your cap table structure. Get it right, and everyone celebrates. Get it wrong, and you will watch your team’s wealth evaporate in legal fees and disputes.
What on earth are these terms??
What role does the cap table have in Scale Up?
In Scale Up!, the cap table isn’t just a teaching tool – it is the backbone of the entire learning experience. Everything flows through it. Every strategic decision participants make, from hiring key talent to choosing between investor offers, ultimately shows up in their cap table.
We designed Scale Up! around a simple truth: you cannot understand startup growth without understanding equity dynamics. Founders face constant trade-offs. Should they take money from that eager angel at a lower valuation, or wait for a lead investor? Should they grant 2% equity to a rockstar COO, or offer a lower package with more cash? Should they raise a large round at a high valuation, or stay lean and bootstrap longer? These questions all converge on the cap table.
Throughout the simulation, teams watch their cap table evolve in real-time. They see how their ownership percentage shrinks with each round. They feel the tension between growth capital and dilution. They experience the consequences of poor terms or ill-timed rounds. And crucially, they develop an intuition for what ‘good’ looks like – balanced ownership, clean structure, alignment with investors.
The cap table also serves as our primary performance tracking mechanism. In our leaderboard, we don’t just track revenue or valuation. We track how efficiently teams deploy capital, how well they preserve equity, and how smartly they structure their deals. The winning teams aren’t necessarily those who raise the most money – they’re the ones who reach their milestones with the least dilution.
From our experience training over 4,000 participants across accelerators, business schools, and VC programs worldwide, we have seen that mastering the cap table transforms how founders think about their business. They stop seeing fundraising as simply getting cash in the door. Instead, they start thinking strategically about capital as a tool, equity as a finite resource, and investors as long-term partners. That mindset shift is what Scale Up! is really about – and the cap table is where it happens.
Good deal? You decide
Here are the four cap tables we use in Scale Up!
Pen & Paper
For smaller groups, with less experience and less time, the good ol’ pen & paper format works perfectly fine. If you are running a discovery session (3 hours) or even a full-day session, you can get far with just pen and paper.
In fact, Scale Up! was first designed for pen & paper, in the view that we learn more when seeing and writing vs. punching numbers into a spreadsheet. There is something powerful about physically writing down each equity transaction. It forces teams to slow down, discuss each decision, and truly understand what is happening to their ownership structure.
Pro:
– Easy to use – Very easy to get started – Simple to manage for both participants and facilitators – Forces intentional, slower decision-making – Great for building foundational understanding
Con:
– Gets complex after first three rounds – Converting SAFEs and CLAs is not so easy in the paper format – More manual, so it takes a lot longer – Hard to track multiple scenarios or run sensitivity analysis
When to use it:
For small groups, lower levels of pre-existing knowledge, limited time, or when introducing basic cap table concepts for the first time.
Who’s in charge:
The team. Make sure the whole team works through this format together. Go slow. Cover the basics. This collaborative approach ensures everyone understands the fundamentals before moving to more complex tools.
Facilitator view:
With small groups, it’s pretty easy to follow. You can always see the documents and paper records on the table. Increase the group size, say, to six or ten teams and it might get a bit trickier. Budget extra time for teams to catch up, and expect to do more hands-on support walking around the room. We typically recommend one facilitator per 15-20 participants when using pen & paper.
Cap Table meets pen & paper. A sight of beauty, truly.
Excel 1.0 (the classic)
Almost as old as the pen & paper format in Scale Up!, the old Excel file is still fantastic to use. It was made for ‘save a local copy’, and has no cloud collaboration or shared leaderboard. It works. It’s simple, but it is also lacking a number of key features.
This version emerged from our early days working with accelerators who wanted something more scalable than paper, but didn’t yet need real-time tracking. It has proven remarkably durable – thousands of founders still use it today.
Pro:
– Easy to use – Covers basic cap table management, nothing else – People use it locally, can take it home and work on it overnight – No internet dependency – Teams can experiment without worrying about ‘breaking’ a shared file
Con:
– Facilitators have little to no insight into how it is going – Hard to follow and impossible to track the top performers – Mistakes are often left unsolved, due to only having local version – No real-time feedback or comparison with peers
When to use it:
Designed to make the pen & paper version slightly more suited for multiple rounds and later stages, it is simple and easy to use. The Excel 1.0 cap table tool is very suitable for small and large groups, at entry- and intermediate levels. Just don’t expect to be able to track performance or clean up mistakes in this format. Best for asynchronous work or when participants want to practice independently between sessions.
Who’s in charge:
The CFO
Facilitator view:
We have run 100’s of sessions with this tool, and it just works. Probably the best tool for super early stage founders who are still wrapping their heads around basic equity concepts. The lack of real-time visibility means you will need to schedule regular check-ins and be ready to troubleshoot issues retroactively rather than preventing them in real-time.
A super simple locally hosted Excel-based cap table, from pre-seed to seed+. No ESOP?
Google Sheet 1.0 (the basic)
A couple of years ago we started experimenting with a shared version, where we could track all teams in the same interface, and also teams could compare themselves in real-time.
We simply copied the excel version into a Google Sheet version (1.0), and voila, we had the basic version. Instantly, this was a hit with participants. The competitive element that emerged from the live leaderboard completely changed the energy in the room. Teams started benchmarking themselves, learning from top performers, and pushing themselves harder.
Pro:
– Same ease of use as Excel – Now in a shared format, with leaderboard – Easy to keep track of all teams, audit and correct cap math mistakes in real-time – Creates healthy competition and peer learning – Facilitators can provide targeted support based on what they see
Con:
– Not many; but a clear message that ‘this is only looking at financing’ – Not tracking ARR, revenue or basic accounting – Teams sometimes focus too much on leaderboard position vs. learning
When to use it:
In most sessions, really. Great for both entry, intermediate and more advanced users. If you have reliable internet and want to create a dynamic, competitive learning environment, this is your go-to tool.
Who’s in charge:
The CFO
Facilitator view:
Bringing the cap table from local Excel to shared Sheet is a game-changer. If there are two facilitators, one would spend ca. 10% of his / her time to just keep an eye on, do light audits and generally correct mistakes before they turned into major problems. The real-time visibility means you can spot patterns – which teams consistently make similar mistakes, which concepts need more explanation, which teams are ready for advanced challenges.
But, the feedback was clear; ‘where do we track everything else….?’ Teams wanted to see how their cap table decisions connected to their revenue growth, hiring plans, and burn rate. That insight led us to build version 2.0.
Series B with Vessemeyer Capital and Fifth Wall, but look closely for the pre-money, post-money and how ESOPs might skew the cap table. Any facilitator would pick this up in a seconds.
Google Sheet 2.0 (the full management dashboard)
In early 2025 we started piloting a more advanced, full scale ‘Management Dashboard’. This tool would quickly outgrow the cap table, and suddenly teams would be able to run full-scale operations, annual accounting, ARR growth, margins, Y-o-Y growth, advisors, zoo animals and exit transactions, all in the same real-time spreadsheet.
Once we saw this live, we knew we were not going back. This version represents the full Scale Up! experience – where financial strategy, operational decisions, and equity management all interconnect. Teams finally see the complete picture: how hiring that expensive VP impacts burn rate, which impacts runway, which impacts when they need to raise, which impacts dilution.
Pro:
– Comprehensive full overview across all aspects of the company – Real-time, shared with running Leaderboard – Makes it superbly easy to run the session as facilitator, offering far more depth into company financials – Reflects real-world complexity that founders actually face – Teams develop holistic strategic thinking, not just cap table mechanics
Con:
– OK, so, it is very complex. It clearly takes time to figure out, and even the best teams get parts of it wrong – It has a lot of moving parts, leaving it hard for the teams to focus on the core, cap table management – Not for beginners, as most get overwhelmed and do not understand the basic financials, never mind cap tables – Requires significantly more facilitator expertise to run well – Teams need strong collaboration and clear role division to manage effectively
When to use it:
Intermediate and advanced-level teams. Need more time. Only worth using when we have minimum one full day, preferably three days. Best for cohorts that already understand startup basics and are ready to wrestle with the messy reality of scaling a company.
Last used with:
Katapult Ocean Program, and here it worked very well. These were experienced impact-driven founders who needed to see how sustainability metrics, investor expectations, and financial performance all connected. The complexity matched their reality.
Who’s in charge:
The CFO, but all team members have dedicated working areas they own. The CEO focuses on strategy and investor relations, the CTO manages product development costs and technical hiring, the CMO tracks customer acquisition and revenue growth. This distributed ownership mirrors how real startup teams actually operate.
Facilitator view:
This is a monster to run, but once it is running it is fantastic. Due to the holistic view on each startup, the full management dashboard takes the Scale Up! experience to another level – but only if you as a facilitator can handle it. You need deep financial literacy, strong group facilitation skills, and the ability to rapidly diagnose where teams are stuck. Plan for at least two facilitators for groups larger than 20 participants. The upside? Teams leave with genuine strategic capabilities that transfer directly to their real companies.
The Leaderboard view everyone cravesZoom in, and find the Series C with SCV at 400M, with 4,4% remaining in the ESOP unallocated.But zoom out, and you realize there is quite a lot to track…
Closing thoughts
With 30-60 new trainers coming online, there will be plenty of chances for Scale Up sessions, big and small. From classrooms to Masterclasses, we will be delivering Scale Up!, Scale Up MENA! and Scale Up Africa Rising!
But, keeping track of all things cap tables is crucial. As a future facilitator, make sure you select the cap table tool that works for you and master it. Use this guide to decide on the right tool for the job for you.
Remember: the tool itself matters far less than your ability to use it effectively. We have seen brilliant sessions run with pen & paper, and mediocre ones with the full dashboard. Your job as a facilitator is to meet participants where they are, push them appropriately, and ensure they leave understanding not just how to fill out a cap table, but why it matters.
Start simple. Master one tool completely before moving to the next. Build your confidence. And most importantly, remember that behind every cap table percentage is a real founder making real decisions about their company’s future. Our job is to help them make those decisions wisely.
https://i1.wp.com/www.engage-innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1761995183920.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=17201280Christian Rangenhttps://www.engage-innovate.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/engage-innovate-logo-main-header-1-300x157.pngChristian Rangen2025-11-03 19:19:392026-05-01 19:20:29The Four Cap Tables in Scale Up!
Over the past 15+ years of working with startup ecosystems across the globe, we’ve watched countless founders make the same expensive mistakes. They give away too much equity too early. They accept SAFE terms they don’t understand. They reach Series B only to discover their ownership has been diluted to single digits.
It doesn’t have to be this way.
The good news? Entrepreneurial finance isn’t rocket science. With the right readings, you can understand the mechanics of dilution, the vocabulary of venture deals, and the strategic choices that protect your ownership over multiple rounds.
We’ve curated this reading list based on three criteria: practical applicability, clarity of explanation, and relevance to the current fundraising environment. Whether you’re splitting equity with co-founders or negotiating your Series B, these books will give you the knowledge to make informed decisions.
We also cover this material in-depth in our Scale Up! Masterclasses. Want the short summary? Start with the Scaling Up in MENA story.
Why This Reading List Matters
According to recent Carta data analyzing over 43,000 US startups, the median founding team owns just 56% of their company after their seed round. By Series A, that drops to 36%. By Series B, founders collectively own just 23% of the company they built.
Think about that. Less than four years after incorporation, the founding team typically owns less than a quarter of their company.
Some dilution is inevitable—you need capital to grow. But we’ve seen too many founders accept unnecessary dilution simply because they didn’t understand their options. The difference between a founder who owns 8% at exit versus 15% can mean millions of dollars and fundamentally different life outcomes.
These ten books represent your education in avoiding those costly mistakes.
Get your reading hat on, let’s go study cap tables, deal terms and anti-dilution terms.
The Reading List: From Foundation to Mastery
Tier 1: Essential Foundation (Start Here)
1. Foundational Equity (Carta, 2025)
Start here. Not with a paid book, but with Carta’s free 52-page report on foundational equity.
This document contains the most current data on equity splits, dilution patterns, and fundraising benchmarks. You’ll learn that 46% of two-founder teams now split equity equally (up from 32% in 2017), that solo-founded startups have increased from 17% to 35% of all new companies, and that approximately 24% of two-founder teams lose a co-founder by year four.
The data is current (through Q1 2025), comprehensive, and directly applicable to decisions you’ll face in the next 90 days.
Founders’ ownership at IPO: does that matter…..?
Key insight: The report shows that SAFE valuation caps increased significantly in Q1 2025 for rounds above $500K, but the median seed round valuation remains at approximately $14-16M. This helps you calibrate your expectations against market reality.
2. Slicing Pie: Funding Your Company Without Funds (Mike Moyer)
Before you raise a dollar, you need to split equity with co-founders fairly. This is where most founding teams start with anxiety and emotion rather than frameworks.
Moyer’s “Slicing Pie” method provides a dynamic equity split model based on relative contributions over time. While controversial in some circles (critics argue it’s complex to administer), the underlying principle is valuable: equity should reflect actual contributions, not just initial promises.
The book is particularly useful for pre-seed teams trying to figure out fair splits when one founder contributes capital, another contributes code, and a third contributes customer relationships.
Moyer has written two companion books that are both worth reading, Slicing Pie Handbook goes into more depth on other who contribute to the company (suppliers, landlords, creditors) and Will Work for Pie covers issues including fair pay and advanced pie slicing skills.
When to read it: Before you sign your founder equity agreements. Many founders rush this step, creating resentment that festers for years.
3. Founder’s Pocket Guide: Cap Tables (Stephen R. Poland)
At just 100 pages, this is the most accessible introduction to capitalization tables available. Poland explains what a cap table is, how to read one, and—critically—how to model what happens to your ownership through multiple funding rounds.
The book covers basics like fully diluted ownership, option pools, and liquidation preferences in language that doesn’t require a finance degree.
Key insight: Most founders don’t realize that the option pool typically comes out of founder shares, not investor shares. This means if you agree to a 15% option pool as part of your Series A, your dilution is higher than you might expect. Poland explains this clearly with examples.
4. All of the other books in the Founder’s Pocket Guide Series:
Each of these are focused on the circumstances you may be facing during your early raise. This is the companion volume to the cap table guide, focused specifically on understanding term sheets.
Steven R. Poland and co-authors break down each one of these topics in easy-to-read tomes of under 100 pages apiece. Most importantly, he explains what matters and in what scenarios they may significantly impact your outcomes.
When to read them: When you start to run into situations that involve other parties that may be looking to invest or will affect your cap table. Don’t sign anything until you’ve read these books and understand every clause.
One Key insight: A $20M post-money valuation with a 1x non-participating liquidation preference is often better for founders than a $25M valuation with a 1.5x participating preference. Term Sheets and Preferred Shares teaches you to see beyond the headline number.
5. Venture Deals: Be Smarter Than Your Lawyer and Venture Capitalist (Brad Feld & Jason Mendelson)
This is the definitive guide to understanding venture capital term sheets and negotiations. Feld and Mendelson (both experienced VCs) pull back the curtain on how VCs think about deal terms, what they care about most, and where founders have negotiating leverage.
The book is comprehensive (around 300 pages) but very readable. It covers everything from economics (valuation, option pool, liquidation preferences) to control (board composition, protective provisions) to other terms (drag-along, right of first refusal, redemption rights).
What makes this book exceptional is the VC perspective. Feld and Mendelson explain why VCs ask for certain terms and which terms matter most to them. This helps you understand where to spend your negotiating capital.
Current relevance: The book is regularly updated. Make sure you get the 5th edition (2024) which reflects current market practices around SAFEs, rolling funds, and other recent innovations.
Tier 3: Strategic Depth
6. Entrepreneurial Finance: The Art and Science of Growing Ventures (Alemany & Andreoli)
This is a proper textbook used in entrepreneurial finance courses at top business schools, including LBS. It’s a great introduction text, covering everything from valuation to financial strategies to basic instruments.
The book provides frameworks for thinking about financial strategy in the European context, with a clear goal to fill a gap in the European market.
When to read it: After you’ve raised your pre-seed round and want to think more strategically about financial planning for later stages.
7. Fundamentals of Entrepreneurial Finance (Hellmann & Da Rin)
Another academic text, but with a more modern, streamlined approach than traditional finance textbooks. Hellmann and Da Rin focus specifically on the unique aspects of financing entrepreneurial ventures versus established companies.
The book covers topics like convertible notes, SAFEs, venture debt, and the relationship between financing choices and business model development. It’s particularly strong on helping you understand why different financing instruments exist and when each is appropriate.
Key strength: The book includes numerous case studies from real companies, helping you see how financial decisions play out in practice.
Tier 4: Comprehensive References
8. The Holloway Guide to Raising Venture Capital (Andy Sparks, et al.)
This isn’t a traditional book—it’s a comprehensive, regularly updated online guide (though available in print). The Holloway Guide is essentially an encyclopedia of venture capital fundraising.
The guide covers everything: how to find investors, craft your pitch, negotiate terms, conduct due diligence, close the round, and manage investor relationships post-funding. It includes templates, checklists, and current market data.
What makes it special: The guide is continuously updated to reflect current market conditions. The section on SAFEs, for example, includes the most current data on valuation caps, discount rates, and conversion mechanics.
When to use it: As a reference throughout your fundraising journey. You won’t read it cover-to-cover, but you’ll return to specific sections repeatedly as you encounter new situations.
9. Startup Law and Fundraising (Swegle)
When the person on the other side of the table is an attorney trained in securities law or hires someone with that background, this book (subtitled “for entrepreneurs and startup advisors”) can provide context and background to help you parse and work your way through the legal morass.
Weighing in over 500 pages, the seventeen chapters are well organized, starting with Overview of Legal and Regulatory Mistakes, through Intellectual Property, Securities Laws, Fundraising and Exit, this book should be a staple for any semi-legal-minded founder that is looking to learn, avoid issues and have the best possible outcomes.
10. Venture Capital Deal Terms: A Guide to Negotiating and Structuring Venture Capital Transactions (de Vries, et.al.)
Written by a VC and two lawyers, this book unpacks deal terms and legal structures easily.
The book is packed and quite extensive. But when you’re negotiating specific terms and need to understand the legal implications, this is the definitive resource.
Who should read it: Founders negotiating Series B or later rounds, or anyone who wants deep understanding of the legal mechanics of venture deals.
How to Use This Reading List
Don’t try to read all ten books before you start fundraising. Here’s a more practical approach:
Pre-fundraising (Before incorporation):
Read Slicing Pie for co-founder equity splits
Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Cap Tables to understand the basics
Read Foundational Equity (Carta) for current market data
Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Term Sheets before reviewing any terms
Read Venture Deals when you’re actively negotiating
Post-seed (Planning for Series A):
Read Founder’s Pocket Guide: Startup Valuation
Read Entrepreneurial Finance for strategic planning
Use The Holloway Guide as a reference
Series A and beyond:
Read Fundamentals of Entrepreneurial Finance for depth
Keep Venture Capital Deal Terms as a reference
Return to Foundational Equity annually for updated market data
Three Critical Insights From This Reading List
After absorbing these resources, three insights emerge that every founder should internalize:
1. Post-money SAFEs protect founders better than pre-money SAFEs
According to Carta data, nearly 80% of SAFEs issued in Q1 2025 were post-money SAFEs. This isn’t accidental. With a post-money SAFE, founders know exactly what ownership percentage they’re selling. With a pre-money SAFE, the actual dilution depends on how much total SAFE funding you raise—creating uncertainty and often greater-than-expected dilution.
If an investor proposes a pre-money SAFE in 2025, ask why. It’s increasingly non-standard.
2. The option pool matters more than most founders realize
The Carta data shows that Employee Stock Option Pools (ESOPs) typically range from 12% to 22% of fully diluted equity across different funding stages. Here’s what many founders miss: this pool is usually created just before an investment round and comes out of the founder/existing shareholder equity, not the new investor equity.
If you’re raising a Series A with a pre-money valuation of $40M and investors want a 15% option pool, that 15% is carved out of your ownership before the new investment arrives. This effectively reduces your valuation by the size of the pool.
Understanding this dynamic (covered well in Poland’s cap table guide and Feld’s Venture Deals) will save you from unexpected dilution.
3. Equal splits are increasingly common but not always optimal
The Carta data shows that 46% of two-founder teams now split equity equally (50/50), up from 32% in 2017. For three-founder teams, 27% split equally, up from 12% in 2015.
While equal splits can work well for teams with genuinely equal contributions, they can create problems if one founder contributes significantly more or if roles diverge substantially over time. Don’t default to equal splits just because they’re common—use frameworks from Slicing Pie and Foundational Equity to think through what’s actually fair for your specific situation.
Beyond the Books: Practical Tools
Reading these books is valuable, but knowledge becomes power when combined with practical tools:
Books & Magic finance at Ashridge House (I’ll be teaching there this week)
Use Carta Launch (free until you raise $1M) to model your cap table scenarios. The platform lets you simulate what happens to ownership across multiple funding rounds with different terms. Before accepting any term sheet, model it in Carta to see the actual dilution impact.
Create a fundraising knowledge base: As you read these books, create a personal reference document with key terms, standard ranges, and your own red lines. This becomes your negotiating guide when you’re in the middle of fundraising pressure.
Join founder communities: Reading about fundraising is valuable, but learning from founders who’ve recently closed rounds is invaluable. Communities like South Park Commons, On Deck, or local founder groups provide context these books can’t.
Sign up for a Scale Up Masterclass: more than 4.000 participants have completed a Scale Up! program over the past seven years. From Canada to Cairo, Cape town to Oslo, founders, angels, mentors, faculty, executives and even VCs have built their skills with Scale Up! Join us for Scale Up Global!, Scale Up MENA! or Scale Up Africa Rising!
A Final Note on Information Asymmetry
VCs read these books. Angel investors read these books. Your lawyers (if you’ve hired good ones) know this material cold.
The information asymmetry in fundraising heavily favors investors. They’ve done dozens or hundreds of deals; you’re doing your first.
This reading list won’t eliminate that asymmetry, but it substantially reduces it. After absorbing these resources, you’ll recognize when terms are non-standard, when you’re being asked to accept unfavorable provisions, and—perhaps most importantly—when to push back and when to accept.
The difference between an informed founder and an uninformed one often shows up years later at exit. The founder who accepted a 2x participating liquidation preference without understanding it might discover that a $100M acquisition barely returns their money after investors take their share. The founder who negotiated that down to 1x non-participating might walk away with $15M instead of $2M.
That difference comes from understanding the content in these ten books.
Start With Foundational Equity
If you do nothing else, download and read Carta’s Foundational Equity report this week. It’s free, it’s current, and it contains data on:
Solo founder vs. multi-founder dilution patterns
Median valuation caps by round size
Expected dilution benchmarks from pre-seed through Series D
Advisor equity standards by stage
Employee equity grant ranges by hire number
52 pages of cap table snack! Thanks, Peter.
This single document will calibrate your expectations to market reality and help you spot when terms are outside normal ranges. Thanks, Peter Walker !
Then, based on where you are in your journey, pick the next 2-3 books from this list that match your immediate needs.
Have you read any of these books? What other entrepreneurial finance resources have you found invaluable? Let us know—we’re always looking to refine this list based on founder experiences.
This reading list was compiled based on 15+ years of working with founders across seed, venture, and growth stages in programs from Europe, Americas, MENA, Africa and APAC. The recommendations reflect resources that consistently help founders make better financial decisions and avoid costly mistakes
https://i2.wp.com/www.engage-innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/1760969910774.png?fit=1280%2C720&ssl=17201280Christian Rangenhttps://www.engage-innovate.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/engage-innovate-logo-main-header-1-300x157.pngChristian Rangen2025-10-29 19:45:392026-05-01 19:46:00Ten Books That Will Save You From Costly Cap Table Mistakes: A Reading List for Founders, advisors & expert facilitators
What role does a bank play in the entrepreneurial ecosystem? Well, as it turns out, a pretty significant one. Since 2014 DNB has supported more than 20.000 startups on their startup journey. With programs like Founders, DNB NXT, 100 Pitches, digital health accelerators, startup coaches and growth mentors; DNB has developed probably the most robust startup support infrastructure amongst the traditional European banks (bravo, DNB!).
DNB’s team Oppstart & Vekst (2024)
Earlier this week 25 of the bank’s ‘founder focused’ staff went through the Scale Up! (from idea to exit) Masterclass. Over 2 packed days and a very long night (for some of us), we took the bankers through every step of the Founder’s Journey.
The Founder’s Journey, from pre-idea to post-exit…….
Working in six teams, the 25 participants selected their (case) company and were off to the races. Over the following days (and night) the teams went through a truly immersive experience as startup founders on the Founder’s journey.
DAY ONE
Six companies, all pre-idea, ready to launch
Early idea-stage (what are we doing, again??) The teams selected Company Cards covering healthcare (strong sector), cleantech, robotics, drone technology and subsea robotics (fish, not oil, btw).
Early strategy Aspirations, ambitions, business model and early customer profiles
Problem-solution fit, anyone?
Early burn rate Turns out, it is expensive to launch and scale a company these days
Startup pitches Just like in real life, got to pitch to impress
Day one, pitch sessions. A nice way to get introduced into the ecosystem.
Early fundraising & term sheets Just like in real-life, things start nice and easy, only to expand and extend into complex term sheets, liquidation preference, board seats and reverse vesting schemes.
Early cap table math and cap table management Pre-money, post-money, SAFE conversion, advisor equity, option program; participants got a chance to dive deep into the joys of equity math. Using our custom-built Cap Table engine, every founder/CFO can manage the cap table, but it still takes work to manage every part of the cap table through 8-12 funding rounds, including preference rights and various unpaid advisor shares…Entrepreneurial finance can be a lot of fun, for the right CFOs.
A view on where the action happens
Investor segmentation Using the Investor Map, we segment all investor prospects into 2×2, to find the most relevant investors, aka the Value Developers
Early revenue growth Or, as the case with one team, how to ramp up your revenue aggressively, to hit 90M ARR in year 1 (in real life, it took Wiz 18 months to pass the 100M ARR milestone)
Wiz – a rocketship to 100M ARR in 18 months. Incredible! (Wheel Tech got to 90M in 12m…)
Climate strategy & securing global climate advisor These days, every company is a climate tech company, so the teams naturally developed their climate strategy and pitched VC expert and Stanford faculty Don Wood to bring him onboard as a strategic advisor.
Capital strategy Using the Long-Term Funding Roadmap, the participants mapped out a longer-term capital strategy, using the following formulas: 3X valuation increase for every round (very challenging) 10% – 25% dilution for every round (challenging) Tracking a valuation to revenue metric of ca. 10X across all rounds
Chasing Unicorns Closing out day 1 with the first ever “bank-born” Unicorn, Wheel Tech, on a mission to change how robotics and logistics run our societies.
Chasing unicorn bragging rights and fresh cash infusion
Hectic capital market Closing out day 1, we say 23 equity financing rounds completed, one unicorn, one pony (half-a-unicorn), and valuations ranging from 1,3BN to 20M. Maybe more important, ARRs were ranging from 90M (very impressive) all the way down to a ‘yet to launch’ strategy and zero ARR.
Day 1 scoreboard: not bad with 23 funding rounds completed in today’s market.
While overnight was intended for a great meal and personal reflection, one team could not quite let it go, and spent six more hours, till well past midnight trying to structure a friendly M&A, and when that didn’t work out, playing for a hyper aggressive hostile take-over.
DAY TWO
Kicking off day two, the participants stepped into the ‘hypergrowth’ part of the journey. Now, we were on a mission to scale. It was time to 5X ARRs and 10X valuations to outrace and outcompete the competition. The rosy days of early-stage entrepreneurship was out and it was time to really put in the work needed at the later stages of the Founder’s Journey.
High performance under pressure; founders multi-tasking in real time
Outcome Scenarios One of the least understood concepts for most founders in the world of entrepreneurship (in our view, at least) is the idea of Outcome Analysis, or rather ‘if an investor invest, what is he/she likely to get back?’. Wow, how I wish more founders understood this (hey, we run a separate bootcamp just on this). For the bankers, the concept of Outcome Scenarios were easy to grasp, but hard to master. Few were able to nail it right off the bat (hey, they only had 45. Minutes, and impressed us with the results achieved in that time.
Outcome Scenario on Cloud Battery, using the Outcome Canvas.
Building a strategic board Just like in real life, a strategic board is vital for the company’s growth. Naturally, the participants had to dive in and build a world-class board, including roles, names and compensation structures.
Excessive burn rate While day one, the early days for founders, day two quickly saw costs spiral completely out of control, and settle at 10M per round, a 100X cost increase from the start of day 1; just like in real-life…
Growth stage financing
Working into the second part of the day, or the later stages of the Founder’s Journey, teams were racing to stay liquid, with some securing emergency bank facilities to stay afloat (after all, they are bankers, right?) and other teams, fueled by strong ARR growth, access to debt financing and a thriving investor market was sitting on piles of cash. One of the most popular investors to run into; Peach Ventures.
Peach Ventures; the perfect growth investor for you?
Complex deal structures
Naturally, as a scaling founder, you will meet complicated terms and deals. Can you make the deal with Hull Street work?
Hull Street Energy x IRA x Complex deal structures, anyone?
Exit Strategy As with any great startup, sooner or later, it is time to discuss that ‘exit part’ of the journey. Same goes for our DNB participants. Of course, as bankers, they held massive insider information benefits, allowing them to nail the exit strategy discussion in record time.
Upcoming board meeting Of course, sprinting through the Founder’s Journey, there sooner or later comes a time to exit. In our case, the board was eager to see a successful listing, allow the company to seek a winning public market position. Easy? Not all. Happens in real life? All the time.
Board Meeting e-mail from your chair; time to go public. Are you up for it?
Our Masterclass ended with all teams seeking a public market outcome, with Oslo, Tokyo and Nasdaq as the exchanges of choice.
Charting the roadmap for Hypercare’s IPO
POST-IPO As the post-IPO dust settled, all IR teams were up and running and the market priced the companies, the performance of the six teams (five, as one merger had taken place) showed Hypercare with a 60BN public market valuation, making it the 21st most valuable company in Japan (congrats), and Subsea Robotics becoming the 15th most valuable company on the OSL stock market. Not bad for two days work….
Post-IPO scoreboard. Notice the impressive founder’s equity posts.
Closing out, the participants got a chance to reflect on the founder’s journey, the challenges founders face in scaling companies beyond the pre-seed stage and how the bank can continue to evolve and mature its offerings to best support startups and scale ups alike.
While none of these founders got to see any liquidity from their efforts (happens in real-life way too often too), the Masterclass served as a great learning opportunity, exposing everyone to the early- (day 1) and later- (day 2) stages of the Founder’s journey, including key topics like capital strategy, outcome scenarios and exit strategy. To all the teams, well done! (and please keep expanding the bank’s role in supporting founders and the companies of tomorrow.
six teams, 25 participants. three facilitators
FACILITATOR NOTE
Scale Up! From idea to exit, is our contribution to the global startup- and scale up ecosystem. In just 2- or 3-days, we are able to pack massive amounts of learning, while also making it highly engaging, competitive and entertaining. Participants learn all key aspects of early-stage financing and growth, including cap table math, term sheets, capital strategy and, going into day 2 or 3, also the changing landscape of growth stage financing. The materials cover 100’s of real-life investors, terms, conditions and get updated monthly to reflect changes in the global startup landscape (down rounds, anyone?)
This year alone, Scale Up! Is run in places like Egypt, Austria, Germany, Norway, Canada, Bahrain, Ghana, Italy, United States, the UK, as well as multiple online sessions for global participants.
The session at DNB was run by Henrik Amstutz, Kyrre Lemvik and Chris Rangen. A big thanks to the impressive participants and the work they are doing for the Nordic ecosystem and beyond!
Join us to build better entrepreneurial ecosystems around the world. Explore Scale Up! Today.
Over the past 24 months, Strategy Tools has assisted accelerators, innovation agencies, and global founder teams in pivoting to a new funding strategy. Gone are the days of relying solely on equity financing. Today, the focus is on blended startup financing. But what is the role of accelerators in this shift, and how can your accelerator help founders succeed across the capital stack?
Eighteen months ago, startup founders were chasing equity investors, and accelerators were hosting mega-demo days. In today’s capital markets, where capital efficiency and profitability take precedence over future growth potential (with AI being an exception), startup founders need to pivot. They must adopt a blended financing structure where grants, debt, and revenue are equally important components of the financing mix.
Today, founders are expected to have the financial acumen, or the right team to support them, to understand various financing opportunities. This includes not only knowing what they are but also understanding their processes, requirements, expectations, and terms. Sifted, a subsidiary of the Financial Times reporting on Europe’s venture capital environment, recently published that European startups raised €47.3bn in equity, debt, and grant funding in the first half of 2024. A total of €18.7bn came from debt. For accelerators, this means the focus needs to be on educating founders on the available capital stack, additionally to traditional equity or convertible loans.
What is a Capital Stack?
The capital stack refers to the various sources of financing. Traditionally, founders and investors focused purely on equity financing (money for an ownership stake), or using convertible loans (or similar instruments).
The capital stack has not changed, but the relevance and use has. In 2024, c. 40% of financing in Europe came from debt – signaling a strong shift and perspective in the market. Today, the sources of proceeds can vary.
Consider that cash from revenues can be used for R&D or hiring or marketing, as well as signed commercial contracts can be used for invoice-based financing. Grants can be used to finance research or projects. All of these are non-dilutive, i.e., have no impact on the cap table which is equally beneficial to founders and investors, who both want to retain the highest stake in the company possible to maximize value.
In the “Our Capital Stack” Canvas, on the Y-Axis we cover the capital stack sources.
The capital stack refers to the hierarchy of financial claims that investors and lenders have on a company’s assets and income and the various sources of funding a company can have.
The most common sources of capital are equity (common vs preferred shares), debt financing (split into senior debt, mezzanine financing, project financing or more) and soft funding (including project based funding, grants, tax benefits, subsidies or more).
Each layer of the capital stack has different risk and return characteristics, influencing how and when investors get paid. Some, like soft funding, do not impact investors (no impact on the cap table) or credit-worthiness and are therefore an incredibly attractive method of raising capital. We should of course not forget any capital coming in from revenue or other existing contracts, like invoice-based financing.
As an accelerator, your entire team should be well versed in all of these capital sources and which would be most beneficial for your companies.
What is Blended Financing?
Blended financing involves combining different types of funding sources, such as equity, debt, grants, and revenue-based financing, to support a startup’s growth. This approach allows startups to optimize their capital structure, reduce dilution, and enhance financial flexibility.
Later on this article, we will cover three cases of how blended financing are used in some of the most successful European startups (based on amount capital raised).
Founders today need to understand how these asset classes work together and the benefits and drawbacks of each. They will look to accelerators or other members in the ecosystem to help educate them on potential alternatives, and what is most relevant for a climate-tech vs edtech vs infrastructure startup.
First-of-a-Kind (FOAK) projects often involve significant infrastructure and heavy asset investments. Understanding the unique challenges and opportunities associated with FOAK projects is crucial for structuring effective blended financing strategies. The example of Northvolt illustrates a FOAK solution as a battery plant of this size and complexity had never been built. Other examples include H2 Green Steel, Climeworks, or LanzaJet.
These projects are typically used for the development of their solution or product, demonstrating the use case on a larger scale prior to initial deployment but bear higher technical, market, and financial risks. Due to the capital-intensive nature of FOAKs, there is a “valley of death” where funding sources are limited between smaller venture capital tickets and larger debt sources (which require lower risk profiles and strong traction), which is why the importance of blended capital becomes relevant.
Governments should be considered for soft funding through grants or loans, project financing solutions through investment banks like the EIB, or equity financing from larger institutions or private equity funds.
For more insights on alternative climate asset classes, refer to this article. For more information on FOAKs, we highly recommend this article. Most recently (August 2024), the French company Ÿnsect will aim to raise a FOAK solution – read Sifted’s coverage here.
A New Landscape for Founders
Startup founders need to adapt to this evolving capital landscape. Key steps founders should take include:
Diversifying funding sources: Explore grants, debt, and revenue-based financing alongside traditional equity.
Prioritizing capital efficiency: Decide with existing and new investors whether to focus on scaling and raising funds until profitability or on achieving profitability and sustainable growth.
Understanding investor expectations: Be aware of the different risk-return profiles across the capital stack.
Building robust financial models: Demonstrate how blended financing can optimize the capital structure, considering interest payments or maturity dates for debt structures, and cap table impact for equity investments.
Engaging with alternative investors: Develop relationships with lenders and grant providers.
Accelerators should feel comfortable with all of these topics amidst a dynamic environment and tough fundraising environment.
The canvas below offers a solid starting point for visualizing various funding streams and their interoperability.
Let’s explore how the Capital Stack canvas plays out through a few case studies:
In our previous Growth Strategy post – we introduced you to the fictional company VoltyngX – an electric vehicle battery repurposing start-up. We continue working with them on the Capital Stack canvas to see what their various capital sources could be going forward:
And here are a few cases from the real world:
Case Study A – Electra
Electra, a French electric vehicle charge point operator, has raised close to €600m since its founding in 2021. Today, the company employs around 200 people across eight countries in Europe, responsible for approximately 200 live stations representing more than 1,200 charge points. Their aim is to build 2,200 charging stations and more than 15,000 charge points in Europe, a capital-intensive endeavor.
Their seed round was led by Serena, raising €15m in June 2021, followed by a €160m Series A led by Eurazeo. In January 2024, the company raised a €304m Series B led by the Dutch pension fund manager PGGM, with participation from BPI France, Eurazeo, RIVE Private Investment, and SNCF. Between their Series A and B, the company also raised around €27m in debt financing from the French bank Credit Agricole.
Case Study B – Tibber
Tibber is a Norwegian smart energy management company providing energy-efficient solutions through a smart energy app. Tibber is currently active in Norway, Sweden, Germany, and the Netherlands, where users pay a monthly fee instead of a markup on electricity prices to promote a greener and more sustainable future. Tibber is considered a ‘soonicorn’ (soon to be a unicorn) with revenues above €2bn in 2023.
Since its founding in 2015, Tibber has actively funded its journey through five equity funding rounds: a SEK7m seed round, NOK15m venture round, $12m Series A, $30m Series B, and $90m Series C. Between these transactions, Tibber also raised significant amounts in soft funding (grants), including SEK3m from Sweden and NOK13.5m from Norway. Before their Series C, they also secured €35m in debt financing from Nordea.
The best-performing companies understand the value of a blended capital stack and how utilizing all financing opportunities available to them provides value to all shareholders.
Here, we mock up what we think it will look like if TIbber were to work on the Our Capital Stack canvas:
Please note that all information in this canvas is purely illustrative. While Strategy Tools is not involved with Tibber, we admire their impressive achievements and are proud to see such innovation emerging from Norway.
Case Study C – Northvolt
Northvolt’s ambition is to supply the automotive industry with electric vehicle batteries, produced in Europe. Over six years, the company has had more than 12 funding rounds from more than 61 investors raising more than €8.7bn.
Northvolt received early funding from Vinnova, Sweden’s Innovation Agency, the Swedish Energy Agency, StenaLine, ABB, and Climate KIC. Following this, the European Investment Bank provided over €50m in debt financing. Siemens invested €10m, and Vargas Holding and Vattenfall contributed €12.5m. Within two to three years, the European Investment Bank extended an additional €350m in debt financing to support the construction of their first factory. Simultaneously, Northvolt secured $1bn from VW, Goldman Sachs, BMW, IKEA, AMF, and others. By July 2020, the company raised €1.6bn in debt financing from a consortium of over 20 banks and €600m in venture financing from 11 investors. The funding journey continued with another €600m from VW and €2.8bn from 19 investors. This case highlights the complexity of today’s funding environment and the importance of understanding various funding sources.
A Changing Role for Accelerators
Accelerators must also evolve to support this new financing paradigm. Their importance in the ecosystem cannot be understated, but they need to shift their learning towards helping founders understand the new and blended capital stack. Crucial actions for accelerators include:
Educating founders on blended financing: Provide training on various funding sources and their implications.
Fostering connections with diverse investors: Build networks with debt providers, grant agencies, and revenue-based financiers.
Redefining success metrics: Shift focus from just equity raised to overall capital efficiency and financial sustainability.
Supporting financial planning: Assist startups in creating comprehensive financial strategies that leverage blended financing.
Adapting demo days: Showcase startups’ ability to secure diverse funding sources and achieve profitability.
Below is Sifted’s calculation of the most active debt funding rounds in 2024 so far. As an accelerator, you should be able to introduce some of these players to your startups or begin building relationships to understand what they are looking for and what different requirements they have.
Ending Notes
As the capital landscape continues to evolve, both founders and accelerators must adapt to leverage blended financing effectively. By diversifying funding sources, prioritizing capital efficiency, and understanding the complexities of the capital stack, startups can navigate this new landscape successfully. Accelerators play a pivotal role in guiding founders through this transition, ensuring they are well-equipped to thrive in a blended financing environment.
https://i1.wp.com/www.engage-innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/277194529_711e142a-4c49-4c86-a2fa-90f9d30f584a-scaled-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C2560&ssl=125602560Christian Rangenhttps://www.engage-innovate.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/engage-innovate-logo-main-header-1-300x157.pngChristian Rangen2024-08-19 17:05:002026-04-23 17:23:00Winning Across the Capital Stack
Startups are the engines of innovation, driving economic growth by offering advanced technologies and solutions to emerging challenges. However, in their relentless pursuit of delivering superior products and meeting customer needs, startup teams can sometimes lose sight of the bigger picture. As professionals working within an accelerator, your role is to guide these teams, helping them maintain a clear strategic vision while navigating the daily demands of their business.
One of the most effective tools we often use with our startups to address this issue is the Rocketship Canvas.
The Rocketship Canvas is a powerful framework that helps founders, investors, board members, and advisors clearly articulate and visualize the key aspects of a startup’s journey and strategy. It has proven to be highly impactful in globally renowned accelerator programs like Katapult and Hatch, where it helps teams align their goals and strategies on a single, visually accessible page.
By regularly updating and using the Rocketship Canvas, you can ensure that the startups you support stay on track and grow strategically.
Why the Rocketship Canvas?
The Rocketship Canvas addresses critical questions that are essential to a startup’s growth, such as:
How can we accelerate the company’s growth?
Where do we want to be in six, 12, and 24 months?
What does our fundraising strategy need to look like to reach these milestones?
Which investors, customers, partners, and experts should we engage to build vital relationships?
Every startup needs a dedicated advisor, manager, or board member who can hold the company accountable. This involves assessing where the startup aimed to be 12 months ago, understanding where it stands today, and envisioning where it could be in the next 12 months. The Rocketship Canvas makes this process tangible by breaking down the journey into three distinct stages, each with its own set of objectives and milestones.
Case: VoltyngX
Let’s explore how the Rocketship Canvas can be applied in a real-world scenario. Consider “VoltyngX,” a startup specializing in repurposing electric vehicle batteries into advanced battery storage solutions. After a significant breakthrough in their technology, VoltyngX is ready to scale commercially. For this exercise, we’ll use VoltyngX as an illustrative example.
Each of the three boxes in the Rocketship Canvas represents a distinct stage in the startup’s growth journey. We encourage teams to creatively ‘name’ each phase, whether it’s as simple as “Phase I” or something more descriptive like “Conquering our Local Market.” In this case, we’ve identified the stages as:
Conquering the Local Market
Expanding into Neighboring Countries
Becoming a Household Name in Europe
Adapting Key Metrics (KPIs) Over Time
As a startup evolves, so too should its key metrics. In the early stages, a startup might focus more on overall revenue or customer acquisition rather than profit margins. As growth progresses, these metrics will naturally shift. For instance, VoltyngX will need to decide whether to prioritize the number of customers, weighted pipeline, bugs resolved, churn rate, or ARPU (Average Revenue Per User) as their business scales.
Setting Targets and “Must-Wins”
Within each stage of the Rocketship Canvas, there are three primary targets that the company aims to achieve. These targets should be meaningful achievements that can be showcased to shareholders, customers, or even on platforms like LinkedIn. Often, these targets are broad and influenced by investors or the board of directors.
Achieving these targets depends on succeeding in the “Must-Wins”—specific, actionable steps that are critical to reaching your goals. For VoltyngX, this might involve hiring a CFO to lead their fundraising efforts and professionalize their internal financial processes. They might also aim to secure a local customer, land their first international customer, and develop a sales strategy that can be effectively scaled as they onboard new hires.
Estimating Revenue and Capital Needs
The final section of the Rocketship Canvas involves making an informed estimate of the revenue the startup aims to achieve by the end of the timeline and determining the capital needed to reach those goals. For VoltyngX, for example, the goal might be to generate over €200k in revenue by raising €1 million, which should sustain the startup through Q2 2025.
Continuous Planning and Adaptation
We encourage startups to spend time thoroughly mapping out their first step, ensuring it is clear and well-defined. It’s also crucial for them to engage with customers, clients, employees, investors, and advisors to gain insights that will shape the company’s journey.
As the startup plans its second and third phases, both quantitative and qualitative measures should be considered. These measurements will serve as a blueprint for a growth strategy that should be revisited and updated quarterly. This regular check-in helps ensure that the company’s progress aligns with its anticipated growth trajectory.
Beyond the Rocketship Canvas
The Rocketship Canvas sets the stage for more comprehensive strategic tools, such as the Outcome Canvas. Together, these frameworks will help the startups you support refine their strategies, positioning them as attractive options for international talent and garnering recognition from local media for their successes.
By guiding startups through the Rocketship Canvas, you’re not just helping them plan for the future—you’re setting them up to achieve sustainable, long-term success.
As long-term partners of leading accelerators worldwide, we empower startups with innovative strategies that drive real results. Our work has helped numerous startups develop stronger fundraising strategies, become investor-ready, and craft clear roadmaps to success. Want to see how we made an impact? Check out our case study with Katapult, an award winning accelerator, or reach out to us at hello@strategytools.io — we’d love to connect!
UPCOMING WEBINAR
Building Better Accelerators
From impact investing in Europe, agritech in Africa, ocean startups in Hawaii, ocean funds in Fiji or climate funds in Singapore, we have seen a number of accelerators up close and personal. From first-generation aquaculture accelerators to early-stage deep-tech accelerators, to recent GP/VC/PE accelerators, there is a constant stream of innovation in the space.
This begs the question, how are accelerators evolving? How should accelerators think about strategy, programming and their own business model? What are the latest trends a leadership team needs to think about and what role does AI play for accelerators? Has the time come for accelerators to rethink their strategy and if so, how?
We will explore these topics and more during the webinar.
https://i1.wp.com/www.engage-innovate.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/04/Rocketship-Canvas-scaled-1.jpg?fit=2560%2C1450&ssl=114502560Christian Rangenhttps://www.engage-innovate.com/newsite/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/engage-innovate-logo-main-header-1-300x157.pngChristian Rangen2024-08-09 17:30:002026-04-23 17:48:11Empowering Startups with the Rocketship Canvas: A Guide for Accelerator Teams