How to Set Up a National Fund-of-Funds: A Strategic Blueprint for Ecosystem Builders

I just got out of a really interesting lunch conversation on how to set up a national fund-of-funds. Here are my notes, sketched out over lunch and expanded into a practical guide for anyone considering this journey.

The Lunch Meeting That Started It All

“We want to build a fund-of-funds,” our lunch meeting guest said, pushing aside his coffee cup to make some more notes. “We have the need, the support and the people, but we just need to get started”.

Sound familiar? Over the past decade, I’ve had this conversation in London, Dubai, Singapore and a dozen other cities. The enthusiasm is always there. The capital is increasingly available. But the roadmap? That’s where things get murky.

This article lays out a practical framework for setting up a national fund-of-funds—from understanding what you’re actually building to navigating the five critical decision points that will determine whether your fund becomes a catalyst for ecosystem transformation or another well-intentioned initiative that struggles to deploy capital.

Lunch sketch on national FoF’s. Three legs, capital, acceleration, LP networks.

What Is a Fund-of-Funds?

A fund-of-funds (FoF) is an investment vehicle that invests in other investment funds rather than directly in companies. Instead of writing checks to startups, a FoF writes checks to venture capital and private equity fund managers, who then deploy that capital into their portfolio companies.

Think of it as a layer of strategic capital allocation—you’re not just funding companies, you’re funding fund managers who will build relationships, develop deal flow, and create value across multiple portfolio companies over time.

Government-Backed Fund-of-Funds

Government-backed FoFs typically serve a dual mandate: financial returns and strategic ecosystem development. They’re designed to catalyze private capital formation, support emerging fund managers, and develop regional investment capacity. These funds often operate with longer time horizons and accept different risk-return profiles compared to purely commercial vehicles.

Key characteristics include:

  • Strategic ecosystem development objectives alongside financial returns
  • Patient capital with 10-15+ year time horizons
  • Willingness to anchor emerging fund managers
  • Focus on market failures and underserved segments
  • Often co-investment rights to increase deployment pace

Private Fund-of-Funds

Private FoFs are commercial vehicles focused primarily on risk-adjusted returns. They provide institutional investors access to top-tier fund managers, diversification across vintages and strategies, and professional due diligence. These funds compete purely on performance and must demonstrate clear LP value proposition.

Key characteristics include:

  • Return-focused with institutional LP base
  • Access to oversubscribed, top-tier managers
  • Portfolio construction expertise and diversification
  • Active secondary market participation
  • Strict performance benchmarking against indices

Notable Examples of Fund-of-Funds

The global FoF landscape includes both government-backed strategic vehicles and commercial institutional players. Here are some instructive examples:

Nysnø Klimainvesteringer (Norway)

Norway’s state-owned climate investment fund operates as a fund-of-funds with NOK 5 billion in capital, specifically targeting funds that invest in renewable energy, clean transportation, and emission reduction technologies. Nysnø demonstrates how government-backed FoFs can deploy capital toward strategic national priorities while maintaining commercial discipline. Their approach combines patient capital with clear climate impact metrics, showing that strategic objectives and financial returns aren’t mutually exclusive.

Dubai Future District Fund (DFDF) (UAE)

The DFDF represents the UAE’s strategic commitment to innovation and technology ecosystem development. This government-backed fund-of-funds focuses on backing both local and international VCs who can deploy capital into the region’s emerging technology companies. The fund serves as an anchor LP for emerging managers and helps establish Dubai as a competitive hub for venture capital activity in the MENA region.

Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) (Qatar)

While QIA operates across multiple asset classes, their fund-of-funds arm has become increasingly active in backing global venture capital and growth equity funds. Their strategy focuses on gaining access to leading managers globally while identifying opportunities for portfolio companies to expand into Middle Eastern markets. QIA demonstrates how sovereign wealth funds can use FoF structures to build relationships with top-tier managers and create pathways for international companies to enter new markets.

Jelawang Capital (Malaysia)

Jelawang Capital is a RM300 million fund-of-funds launched by the Malaysian government to accelerate local venture capital ecosystem development. The fund backs both established and emerging fund managers investing in Malaysian startups, with particular emphasis on technology and innovation-driven companies. Jelawang’s approach includes not just capital deployment but active ecosystem building through GP capability development.

Private Market Examples

Multiple Capital: A leading institutional fund-of-funds that focuses on providing emerging managers with anchor capital and strategic support. Their model combines financial backing with operational expertise, helping new fund managers navigate their first fund lifecycle.

Isomer Capital: Focuses on backing diverse fund managers and traditionally underrepresented GPs, demonstrating how FoFs can address systematic market gaps while generating competitive returns. Their thesis centers on the opportunity created when talented managers face traditional LP access barriers.

Cendana Capital: Perhaps one of the most successful early-stage fund-of-funds globally, Cendana has pioneered the micro-VC ecosystem development model. Founded by Michael Kim in 2010, Cendana became the first institutional investor in firms that went on to become some of the most successful seed-stage investors globally, including Forerunner Ventures, Initialized Capital, and SV Angel’s funds.

Watch Michael Kim discuss the Cendana Capital approach: Michael Kim | Founder of Cendana Capital on How Small VC Funds Can Return 200X+

Kim’s insight was recognizing that backing the right emerging managers at the seed stage—when they themselves needed patient capital to build their franchises—could generate exceptional returns while simultaneously developing the venture capital ecosystem infrastructure that startups needed to scale.

Understanding Your FoF Thesis: Two Examples

Before committing hundreds of millions in capital, you need absolute clarity on your investment thesis. A strong FoF thesis goes beyond “we want more venture capital in our ecosystem.” It requires deep understanding of market gaps, strategic positioning, and realistic success metrics.

Here are two contrasting but viable thesis examples:

Example 1: The Strategic Ecosystem Catalyst

Nordic Climate Technology FoF

Purpose: Accelerate Nordic leadership in climate technology by developing specialized fund management capacity focused on deep tech, industrial decarbonization, and sustainable infrastructure.

Geographic Focus: Priority to Nordic-based managers, with 40% allocation to European managers with Nordic co-investment commitment.

Stage Focus: 60% early-stage (seed through Series A) / 40% growth stage (Series B to PE)

Sector Focus: Climate technology, including energy transition, circular economy, sustainable materials, carbon capture, and industrial efficiency.

Target Fund Manager Profile:

  • Emerging managers (Fund I-III) with domain expertise
  • Proven investment professionals with climate technology sector knowledge
  • Strong technical networks in Nordic research institutions and corporate partners
  • Commitment to portfolio company value creation beyond capital

Strategic Value Creation:

  • Build dedicated climate tech investment capacity in region
  • Leverage Nordic strengths in renewable energy, maritime, and industrial technologies
  • Create pathways for portfolio companies to access Nordic corporate partners
  • Develop LP ecosystem around climate technology thesis

Success Metrics (5-Year):

  • 15+ fund managers backed representing 4+ Nordic countries
  • €800M+ in indirect portfolio company investment catalyzed
  • 50+ portfolio companies connected to Nordic corporate partners
  • 8+ GP teams expanded to raise Fund II
  • Top quartile IRR performance against European VC benchmarks

Example 2: The Commercial Access Vehicle

Pan-Asian Technology Growth FoF

Purpose: Provide institutional investors with curated access to top-performing growth-stage technology investors across Asia-Pacific, capturing returns from the region’s scaling digital economy.

Geographic Focus: Greater China 35% / Southeast Asia 30% / India 25% / ANZ + Japan 10%

Stage Focus: 80% growth stage (Series B through pre-IPO) / 20% late-stage venture (Series A-B)

Sector Focus: Enterprise software, fintech, e-commerce enablement, healthtech, and digital infrastructure. Explicitly avoiding consumer social and gaming.

Target Fund Manager Profile:

  • Established managers (Fund II+) with proven track record
  • Teams with regional operational networks and exit execution capability
  • Managers with differentiated sourcing in high-growth sectors
  • Portfolio construction discipline and realistic ownership targets

Strategic Value Creation:

  • Portfolio construction optimization across vintage years and strategies
  • Active position management and secondary market participation
  • Cross-portfolio strategic introductions for regional expansion
  • Proprietary LP reporting and portfolio transparency

Success Metrics (5-Year):

  • 25+ fund commitments across 12+ managers
  • Gross MOIC 2.5x+ with top-quartile DPI profile
  • 15+ portfolio companies achieving unicorn valuation or successful exit
  • Zero capital loss to fraudulent managers (through rigorous operational DD)
  • Successful Fund II raise based on demonstrated performance

These thesis examples illustrate fundamentally different approaches—one optimizing for ecosystem development with patient capital, the other optimizing for institutional returns with established managers. Both are valid. What matters is strategic clarity and consistent execution against your chosen model.

Use the FoF Thesis Canvas to get started.

Setting Up a National Fund-of-Funds: Five Critical Decision Points

So, back to that lunch meeting. What are the essential elements that determine success? Based on working with fund-of-funds teams across three continents, here are the five decisions that matter most:

1. Purpose: Why Are We Really Doing This?

This sounds obvious, but fuzzy purpose kills fund-of-funds faster than any other factor. You need brutal clarity on whether you’re building an ecosystem development vehicle, a commercial return optimizer, or something in between.

Key Questions:

  • What specific market failure or opportunity are we addressing?
  • What does success look like in 5 years? In 10 years?
  • How do we balance financial returns with strategic objectives?
  • What happens if these objectives conflict?
  • Who are our key stakeholders and what are their expectations?

Red Flags:

  • “We want to do what [other country/region] did” without understanding their context
  • Multiple conflicting objectives with no clear priority order
  • Success metrics that shift based on who’s asking
  • Purpose defined in terms of capital deployment rather than outcomes

Best Practice: Create a one-page strategy statement that articulates your purpose, success definition, and decision-making principles. Share it with every stakeholder. If you can’t get universal agreement on this document, you’re not ready to deploy capital.

2. Backing: Do We Have the Right Political and Industry Backing?

A fund-of-funds requires sustained commitment across political cycles and market conditions. Without genuine backing from both government (if public sector) and private industry, you’ll struggle to attract quality fund managers or maintain strategic focus when things get difficult.

What Real Backing Looks Like:

  • Multi-year capital commitment that survives budget cycles
  • Board composition that includes experienced fund-of-funds professionals and institutional investors
  • Political air cover when early investments underperform (because they will)
  • Private sector LP participation or endorsement
  • Support from existing fund manager community

Building Backing:

  • Conduct extensive stakeholder consultation before launch
  • Establish advisory board of experienced LPs and fund managers
  • Create transparent reporting mechanisms
  • Set realistic expectations about J-curve and long-term nature of returns
  • Develop champions in both political and business leadership

Warning Signs of Weak Backing:

  • Fund structure requires annual budget approval
  • Board lacks investment experience or changes frequently
  • Private sector skepticism about government involvement
  • Unrealistic return expectations from political leadership
  • Lack of committed capital beyond initial year

3. Investment Structure: What Should the Investment Structure Look Like?

Your investment structure needs to balance strategic flexibility with institutional discipline. This includes fund sizing, deployment pace, portfolio construction, and commitment sizing.

Critical Structural Decisions:

Fund Size: Right-size your vehicle for your ecosystem. A $50M fund-of-funds can back 5-10 managers meaningfully. A $500M fund needs 20-30 managers for diversification. Common mistake: oversizing the fund relative to investable universe.

Commitment Size: Typically $5-25M per fund, representing 5-15% of target fund size. Too small = no influence or economics. Too large = concentration risk and manager dependency.

Deployment Pace: Plan for 3-4 year investment period with 8-12 fund commitments per year. Front-loading creates portfolio construction problems. Back-loading suggests inadequate deal flow.

Vintage Year Diversification: Invest across multiple vintage years to reduce timing risk. Target 3-4 vintage years during investment period.

Re-Up Strategy: Decision framework for following managers into subsequent funds. Top-quartile performers typically get 1.5-2x commitment in Fund II.

Co-Investment Rights: Negotiate rights but be realistic about execution capability. Most FoFs lack resources for extensive co-investment.

Geographic and Sector Guardrails: Clear but not overly restrictive. “60% domestic, 40% international with domestic co-investment” works. “Exactly 25% in each of four sectors” creates portfolio construction problems.

4. GP Accelerator: How Do We Build a World-Class GP Accelerator?

Here’s the inconvenient truth: there should be no fund-of-funds without a supporting GP accelerator, especially in emerging markets.

Most FoFs I’ve ever seen fail for one key reason: their GPs can’t close and the FoF ends up not deploying their committed capital. You commit to backing 15 emerging fund managers. Two years later, only 5 have closed funds. You’re going back to the board explaining you’re holding “committed but not called capital” for years, and the GPs have given up.

The solution? Build GP capability development into your fund-of-funds strategy from day one.

What a GP Accelerator Provides:

  • Structured fundraising training and capability development
  • Access to LP networks through organized roadshows
  • Fund formation and legal infrastructure support
  • Portfolio management and value creation frameworks
  • Peer learning among cohort of emerging managers
  • Ongoing strategic advising throughout fundraising journey

Integration with FoF:

  • GP accelerator participants become qualified pipeline for FoF commitments
  • FoF acts as anchor LP for graduating accelerator participants
  • Combined model reduces risk of capital deployment failure
  • Accelerator fees can partially offset FoF operational costs
  • Creates sustainable ecosystem development model

Essential Components:

  1. Rigorous selection process (accept 10-15% of applicants)
  2. 3-6 month structured program combining hard work, mentorship, and LP access
  3. Dedicated program team with fundraising and fund operations expertise
  4. LP network partnerships for roadshow opportunities
  5. Post-program support and relationship management

For detailed frameworks on building GP accelerators, see our articles on Building a GP Accelerator and Planning a GP Accelerator: Use the GP Accelerator Business Model Canvas.

5. LP Network: How Do We Build a Winning LP Network Around Our FoF?

A fund-of-funds isn’t just a capital vehicle—it’s a network amplifier. Your LP network should strengthen your portfolio managers’ fundraising capability, not just provide capital.

Ready for a FoF yet? Try the LP Network Statement canvas first.

Strategic LP Network Building:

Anchor LPs: Secure 2-3 substantial anchor commitments from credible institutional investors or development finance institutions. These commitments validate your fund to the market and attract additional LPs into the GPs.

Complementary LP Mix:

  • Development finance institutions (patient capital, strategic alignment)
  • Family offices (flexible, relationship-driven)
  • Corporate strategics (industry connectivity)
  • Institutional investors (credibility, discipline)
  • High-net-worth individuals (fast decisions, enthusiasm)

LP Value Beyond Capital:

  • Make LP introductions to portfolio GPs for their fundraising
  • Create LP-GP networking events and roadshow opportunities
  • Facilitate portfolio company business development through LP networks
  • Share best practices and market intelligence across LP community

LP Reporting Excellence:

  • Quarterly reporting with portfolio-level and fund-level metrics
  • Annual LP meetings with portfolio GP presentations
  • Transparent discussion of underperformance and course corrections
  • Regular market insights and ecosystem development updates

Building the Network:

  • Start with 15-20 target LP prospect, build from there
  • Conduct extensive LP diligence on what they want from a FoF
  • Create LP advisory committee for ongoing strategic input
  • Long-term, aim for a network of 3.000 co-LPs you can work with
You can never have enough LPs, can you?

The Hard Reality: Timeline and Patience Required

Building and scaling a successful national fund-of-funds is not an easy task. It’s a multi-year effort—easily five years to show any meaningful results (deployed, not returned) and often 10-12 years to start showing underlying fund performance worth anyone’s attention.

Year 1-2: Fund formation, initial LP commitments, first GP scouting. Little visible progress beyond early conversations had.

Year 3-5: Early commitments. Portfolio construction, some closings. GP funds begin deploying into portfolio companies. Some early markups possible but no distributions.

Year 6-8: Early portfolio companies reaching inflection points. First modest distributions from faster-returning funds. Meaningful valuation increases. Fund II decisions for top-performing managers.

Year 9-12: Material distributions might begin. Performance relative to benchmarks becomes measurable. Ecosystem impact becomes visible. Capital recycling decisions.

Year 12+: Full cycle performance validated. Success stories emerge. Market demonstration effects visible. Fund II or successor vehicle decisions.

This timeline doesn’t account for the inevitable disappointments: managers who underperform, fraudulent operators who slip through diligence, market corrections that destroy portfolios, political pressure to deploy capital faster than prudent.

From Strategy to Execution

The lunch conversation that inspired this article ended with a clear call to action this week already. I am excited to see what that next conversation might being.

We already know, from emerging ecosystems in places like the Nordics and MENA, that a national fund-of-funds can transform an ecosystem. It can catalyze private capital formation, develop fund management capacity, and create pathways for startups to access growth capital. But only if it’s designed with strategic clarity, built with institutional discipline, and executed with patient commitment to long-term outcomes.

The napkin sketches from lunch was important. But it is the work that happens next that matter.

Want to Learn More About Building VC Ecosystems?

This article is part of an ongoing series on ecosystem development, fund strategy, and GP capability building. For more frameworks and insights:

Chris Rangen is a fund strategy advisor who has worked with 250+ emerging fund managers globally and has consulted on multiple fund-of-funds initiatives across Asia, Europe, and the Middle East. Alongside colleagues like Scott B. Newton and Rick Rasmussen, he runs global VC Masterclasses and teaches at leading programs like IMD’s Venture Asset Management Program, led by Jim Pulcrano (Lausanne), and Newton Venture Program (London).

Over the past five years, he has designed and run 3 GP accelerators in collaboration with 2X GP Sprint, and he has helped design five more programs. He believes that thoughtfully designed fund-of-funds paired with robust GP accelerators can accelerate ecosystem development by 5-10 years compared to purely organic market development.

Reach Chris at Chris@strategytools.io or WhatsApp: +4792415949

In most venture capital ecosystems, the lack of exits and liquidity events form a massive challenge for LPs, GPs, founders, employees and the next generation of entrepreneurs alike. Yet, we see investors, like Silverback Holdings, being able to generate liquidity events along the journey. In our work with investment firms we have been able to build more exit skills, exit capacity and successful exit transactions. The secret? Using the Exit Journey Canvas.

In this post, we invited key ecosystem builders like David van Dijk and Anthony William Catt to share their invaluable views on exits and liquidity in the market.  Grab the canvas. Join the conversation and good luck on getting more strategic exits and liquidity in your portfolio.

Chris Rangen & Claude.ai, with key contributions from David van Dijk & Anthony William Catt

Preface: How Ecosystem Scales

For the startup ecosystem to thrive, we need to accelerate exits and unlock liquidity. Without visible success stories, confidence falters and capital slows. Liquidity proves that the system works.

Major exits like Paystack’s acquisition by Stripe and Expensya’s sale to Medius demonstrate that startups from Africa and other emerging markets can achieve high-value outcomes. These events not only attract global investor attention but also validate the viability of the ecosystem.

Just as important is what happens after the exit. In Nigeria, members of the “Paystack Mafia”—former employees and early backers—have become active investors and mentors, supporting a wave of new startups. In Tunisia, Expensya’s exit generated over $10 million in employee payouts, instantly creating a new pool of angel investors.

This cycle of capital and talent reinvestment builds momentum. It’s how ecosystems scale—from early wins to sustained growth.

– David van Dijk, Team Lead Boost Africa TA, Co-Lead African Angel Academy.

Why, Exit Journey?

For many VC firms, especially those managing their first or second funds, the transition from “investing in great companies” to “creating liquidity events” represents a fundamental shift in mindset and capability.

Over the past two years, we have worked with investment firms across Europe, MENA, Africa, APAC and North America on creating more exits.

One Of Our ‘Secret Tools’? The Exit Journey Canvas.

What Is The Exit Journey Canvas?

The Exit Journey Canvas provides a structured approach to navigate the shift from investments to generating exits at scale. The canvas is a ten-step, visual workflow for how fund managers, from Senior partners to associates, can bring a structured workflow to exits and liquidity in the existing investment portfolio.

It is a canvas perfectly suited for exit teams, Head of DPI or anyone tasked with creating exits and liquidity in an existing portfolio. Note, the Exit Journey Canvas is not designed for working on exit paths pre-investment. For that purpose we recommend the GP Exit Canvas.

The Exit Journey Canvas:
  1. Exit Assessment How do we rank our Portfolio companies on exit readiness and exit maturity? Is there any exit, liquidity or even partial liquidity potential in our companies? Do we have any specific companies we should take on the Exit Journey?
  2. Exit alignment Do we have full alignment on liquidity and exit between the other investors, the board, founders and management team?
  3. Exit mapping How well do we know the landscape for exits and liquidity?
  4. Exit routes Have we mapped out the top routes and most likely candidates?
  5. Exit strategy & roadmap Have we created the gameplan and roadmap to succeed?
  6. Exit team Who should be on the deal team?
  7. Exit process Do we have a timeline and clear, step-by-step process?
  8. Exit outreach How do we lead the a successful exit outreach and competitive process?
  9. Exit transaction Do we have the experience, skills and team to close a successful transaction?
  10. DPI (Distributions to our LPs) Are we ready to start paying out some distributions to our Limited Partners?

The Exit Canvas, in connection with the five other deep dive canvases, helps any team establish a step-by-step process to radically increase the chances of a successful liquidity event, and ultimately LP returns.

Want the Exit Journey Toolkit? Download here.

The Challenge Of Portfolio Exits

Consider the typical mid-fund scenario: you’re seven years into your fund lifecycle, your best investments are showing strong traction, but exits remain elusive. Your LPs are asking about liquidity timelines, founders are focused on growth over exit preparation, and potential acquirers aren’t yet taking serious interest. This is where the Exit Journey Canvas becomes invaluable.

Unlike the GP Exit Canvas (read here) , which embeds exit thinking into investment decisions, the Exit Journey is designed for active portfolio management. It provides a systematic approach to evaluate, prepare, and execute exits for companies already in your portfolio.

Canvas In Action: Kilimanjaro Ventures Fund III

To illustrate the Exit Journey in practice, let’s follow Kilimanjaro Ventures’ evolution. Now managing their third fund—a $100M vehicle launched in 2020—they’ve become one of East Africa’s most successful venture capital firms. Their proven exit track record from Funds I and II has attracted larger LPs and enabled bigger check sizes, typically $3-8M investments in Series A and B rounds across Africa. Across the portfolio, KV III is now regularly updating the portfolio ranking by exit readiness (management and process readiness) and exit maturity (good return potential).

By Fund III, Kilimanjaro has expanded beyond East Africa into West Africa, making their largest investment to date: $6M into Lagos-based RideConnect, a pan-African mobility platform competing with traditional ride-hailing services.

Let’s walk through each step of the Exit Journey using RideConnect and other Fund III portfolio companies as examples.

1. Exit Assessment: Identifying Exit Potential

The Canvas: Systematically evaluate each portfolio company’s exit readiness and potential, creating a pipeline of exit candidates.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: Five years into Fund III, the team conducts their quarterly exit assessment across 22 portfolio companies using their refined scorecard system. They evaluate companies across six dimensions: financial performance, market position, strategic value, management quality, exit market conditions, and competitive differentiation.

Their Q3 2026 assessment reveals distinct categories:

Immediate Exit Potential: RideConnect (mobility) leads with $12M ARR, operations in 6 African countries, 2.5 million active users, and increasing strategic buyer interest as global mobility companies seek African expansion.

12-Month Exit Window: PayFlow (B2B payments) shows strong unit economics but needs to achieve $5M ARR threshold that strategic buyers typically require for serious consideration.

24+ Month Timeline: AgriLogistics (supply chain) has excellent technology and partnerships but requires scale across 10+ countries before becoming attractive to international buyers.

The assessment prioritizes RideConnect based on multiple factors: proven product-market fit across diverse African markets, strong unit economics in major cities, and a competitive landscape where international players are actively acquiring local champions.

2. Exit Alignment: Building Internal Consensus

The Canvas: Ensure full alignment between investors, board members, and founding teams on exit strategy and timeline.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: For RideConnect, their highest-priority exit candidate, Kilimanjaro schedules alignment sessions with CEO A. Okafore and the founding team. Initial discussions reveal interesting dynamics: the founders are excited about exit possibilities but want to ensure any acquisition preserves their vision for African mobility innovation.

Through structured workshops, they establish shared priorities:

●       Achieve minimum 8x return for all investors (targeting $100M+ exit value)

●       Maintain operational independence for African markets

●       Preserve employment for RideConnect’s 400+ person team

●       Complete transaction within 18 months to align with fund timeline

The founding team agrees to begin exit preparation while continuing aggressive expansion into Ghana and Senegal. Board consensus emerges around positioning RideConnect as the leading African mobility platform rather than just a Nigerian success story.

For PayFlow, alignment sessions reveal the founding team prefers to raise additional growth capital rather than pursue exit. Kilimanjaro agrees to support a bridge round while keeping exit optionality open for 2027.

3. Exit Mapping: Understanding The Landscape

The Canvas: Comprehensively map potential acquirers, market conditions, and competitive dynamics that will influence exit opportunities. To assist teams here, we also recommend using the Exit Landscape Map and GP Exit Paths to assist the quality of research and market mapping at stage. These tools are a part of the GP’s toolbox and can be brought in to give a more analytical way of working for the GP team.

Using the GP Exit Paths, the KV team may realize the best, or most likely exit paths are going to be strategic M&A, PE, Partial Secondaries and IPO as a far-away, unlikely option.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: For RideConnect, their mapping process identifies four categories of potential acquirers in a possible M&A deal.

Global Mobility Giants: Uber, Bolt, and DiDi are all expanding African presence. Recent transactions suggest 6-10x revenue multiples for profitable mobility companies with strong market positions.

Regional Tech Champions: Jumia and Interswitch have both signaled interest in mobility investments. These buyers value local market knowledge and regulatory relationships.

Automotive Strategic Buyers: Volkswagen, Toyota, and local partners like Stallion Group seek African mobility data and customer relationships for future automotive strategies.

Financial Services Integration: Banks like Access Bank and fintech companies see mobility platforms as customer acquisition channels for financial services.

The mapping reveals critical timing insights: Uber has recently appointed a new Africa head with aggressive expansion mandates. Bolt raised $700M specifically for emerging market expansion. DiDi is exploring African entry after successful Latin American expansion.

Competitive analysis shows that Uber’s African operations remain subscale compared to their global footprint, creating acquisition motivation. Bolt’s recent Lagos entry validates the market but also creates urgency for consolidation.

Partial secondaries: through this initial mapping exercise, existing co-investors indicate they might be willing to take half of Kilimanjaro’s shares, at a ‘reasonable’ discount.While not a priority at this point, secondaries should never be disregarded and gets stored away as an option for the team at Kilimanjaro Ventures.

4. Exit Routes: Prioritizing Pathways

The Canvas: Identify and prioritize the most promising exit routes based on company readiness, market conditions, and strategic fit. To dig deeper, we frequently suggest using the Exit Routes Canvas at this stage. The Exit Routes canvas is a superb tool to map out strategic groups and start listing specific buyers and what would make this deal relevant to them. Having used the Exit Routes Canvas is 100’s of Masterclasses and Workshops, this is one of the tools people tend to call “extremely useful”.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: Based on mapping analysis, they prioritize RideConnect’s exit routes:

Primary Route: Strategic acquisition by Uber for African expansion, targeting Q4 2027. This offers highest potential valuation, proven integration playbook, and global scaling opportunities.

Secondary Route: Acquisition by Bolt to defend their African expansion strategy, potentially faster timeline but lower valuation multiples.

Tertiary Route: Sale to regional technology champion (Jumia or Interswitch) for ecosystem integration, good cultural fit but limited international scaling.

They consciously deprioritize automotive strategic buyers due to longer integration timelines and uncertain synergy realization.

For each route, they develop specific preparation requirements. The Uber route requires demonstrating regulatory compliance across all markets, driver/rider retention metrics, and competitive differentiation. The Bolt route needs detailed competitive intelligence and market share documentation. Regional buyers want comprehensive African expansion plans and partnership possibilities.

5. Exit Strategy & Roadmap: Building The Plan

The Canvas: Develop detailed roadmaps for preparing portfolio companies for exit, including milestones, timelines, and resource requirements. Two canvases serve as great digging deeper tools here; the Exit Strategy Canvas (inspired by the  book, Exit Path), and Exit Roadmap. These tools are designed to be used by  the project team, in collaboration with management, board and key stakeholders.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: For RideConnect’s primary exit route (Uber acquisition), they create a 12-month preparation roadmap:

Months 1-3: Complete comprehensive financial audit across all operating countries, compile regulatory compliance documentation, and standardize reporting across markets. Kilimanjaro connects RideConnect with PwC for multi-country audit coordination.

Months 4-6: Develop detailed competitive analysis showing market leadership positions, compile driver and rider satisfaction data, and document technology infrastructure scalability. Engage with McKinsey for strategic positioning analysis.

Months 7-9: Prepare integration documentation showing operational similarities with Uber’s platform, complete technical due diligence preparation, and develop management presentation materials for buyer meetings.

Months 10-12: Finalize expansion into Ghana and Senegal to demonstrate continued growth momentum, compile customer reference testimonials, and prepare detailed financial projections for combined entity scenarios.

Throughout this period, RideConnect continues aggressive market expansion while building exit readiness. Kilimanjaro provides dedicated project management support and covers all external advisor costs as portfolio support.

6. Exit Team: Assembling The Right Deal Team

The Canvas: Build a dedicated team, combining portfolio company management, VC firm expertise, and external advisors to execute exit processes. Frequently, a financial advisor and legal advisor would be involved here. For smaller deals, or secondary transactions that might not always be the case.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: For RideConnect, they assemble a seven-person exit team reflecting the complexity and scale of the potential transaction:

From RideConnect: CEO Okafore leads strategic discussions and buyer relationships. CFO T.. Adeleke manages financial documentation and due diligence coordination. CTO D. Okwu handles technical integration discussions.

From Kilimanjaro: Managing Partner K.. Mwangi oversees overall process and leverages relationships with global mobility industry. Principal A. Kiprotich manages day-to-day coordination and timeline execution.

External Advisors: Investment banking team from Frontier Growth Capital Advisors  provides transaction expertise and international buyer access. Legal counsel from Temple Law Partners  handles multi-jurisdictional transaction structuring.

The team meets weekly during preparation phase and daily during active negotiations. Each member has clearly defined responsibilities and escalation authority for rapid decision-making.

For smaller portfolio exits, including secondaries,  Kilimanjaro uses streamlined three-person teams, but RideConnect’s scale and complexity justify the expanded structure.

7. Exit Process: Managing The Transaction

The Canvas: Execute systematic process for managing buyer outreach, due diligence, and negotiations while maintaining business operations.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: When RideConnect achieves exit readiness in Q2 2027, they plan a structured process:

Weeks 1-3: Initial outreach to six target buyers through warm introductions. Mwangi will leverage her expanding global network to arrange conversations with Uber’s Africa strategy team and Bolt’s expansion executives.

Weeks 4-8: Management presentations to four interested buyers. RideConnect’s strong metrics (40% market share in Nigeria, profitability in Lagos and Abuja, 25% month-over-month growth in new markets) is expected to generate significant buyer interest.

Weeks 9-16: Due diligence process with three serious buyers (Uber, Bolt, and Jumia). The exit team is prepared to manage comprehensive data room setup across six countries, coordinate management interviews in multiple time zones, and respond to detailed technical and regulatory questions while ensuring RideConnect’s operations continue seamless expansion.

Weeks 17-20: Letter of intent negotiations. Discussions expected to cover strategic synergies including driver training programs, technology platform integration, and African market growth potential  that might increase valuation significantly above initial expectations.

Throughout the process, Kilimanjaro is prepared to maintain transparent communication with RideConnect’s management and provide  regular updates to their LPs on transaction progress and portfolio impact. The plan, the timeline and process is now ready to launch.

8. Exit Outreach: Activating Buyer Network

The Canvas: Systematically reach out to potential acquirers through warm introductions, industry connections, and strategic relationships.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: Drawing on their expanded network from three successful funds, Kilimanjaro leverages multiple relationship paths:

Global VC Network: Their LP relationship with IFC connects them directly to Uber’s corporate development team through mutual portfolio connections.

Industry Conferences: At the Africa Tech Summit in Kigali, Mwangi arranges private meetings between RideConnect’s CEO and executives from three potential acquirers.

Advisory Relationships: Their strategic advisor, former Jumia executive N. Hodara, facilitates warm introductions to both Bolt and current Jumia leadership.

Portfolio Synergies: Their fintech portfolio company PayFlow has existing partnership with Interswitch, creating introduction path to their corporate venture arm.

Investment Banking Network:  Frontier Growth Capital Advisors leverages relationships with international clients to arrange strategic discussions with DiDi and other global mobility companies.

Each outreach approach is carefully customized. Conversations with Uber emphasize African market expertise and regulatory navigation. Bolt discussions focus on competitive differentiation and market share protection. Regional buyers hear about ecosystem integration and cross-selling opportunities.

The key success factor is activating multiple high-quality relationship paths simultaneously while maintaining process confidentiality and buyer competitiveness.

9. Exit Transaction: Closing The Deal

The Canvas: Manage final negotiations, due diligence, and closing process while protecting both investor and founder interests.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: When Uber emerges as the preferred buyer for RideConnect at a $600M valuation, the transaction process intensifies significantly:

Legal Documentation:  Temple Law Partners leads purchase agreement negotiations across six jurisdictions, drawing on their experience with previous Kilimanjaro cross-border exits to navigate complex regulatory requirements.

Technical Integration Planning: Uber’s technical team conducts extensive API integration testing and driver platform compatibility analysis. RideConnect’s technical documentation prepared during the roadmap phase proves invaluable for accelerating this complex process.

Regulatory Approval Coordination: The transaction requires regulatory approvals in Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda, Ghana, Senegal, and Tanzania. Kilimanjaro coordinates with local legal counsel in each market to manage parallel approval processes.

Founder and Team Protection: Negotiations include employment agreements for RideConnect’s leadership team, equity retention in the combined entity, and operational independence guarantees that preserve the company’s African market focus and innovation culture.

Multi-Investor Coordination: Kilimanjaro coordinates with RideConnect’s other investors (including Series A lead TLcom Capital and strategic investor MTN Ventures) to ensure aligned negotiating positions and efficient documentation execution.

The transaction closes in 22 weeks from initial serious discussions, generating a 10.4x return for Kilimanjaro and establishing RideConnect’s founders as key leaders in Uber’s African expansion strategy.

10. DPI (Distributions To Paid-In Capital): Returning Capital To LPs

The Canvas: Efficiently process distributions while managing tax implications, LP communications, and fund performance reporting. Ultimately, your LPs will want their capital back – with proceeds; and on the back of a great exit event, there should be a timeline to pay out to LPs.

Kilimanjaro’s Approach: The RideConnect exit generates $62M in proceeds for Kilimanjaro’s $6M investment. The distribution process involves several strategic considerations:

LP Communication Strategy: Before closing, Kilimanjaro sends comprehensive transaction analysis to LPs explaining the strategic rationale, competitive process, and return implications. They host dedicated LP webinar featuring RideConnect’s CEO discussing the African mobility market opportunity and Uber’s integration plans.

Distribution Timing Optimization: They coordinate with fund administrators across multiple jurisdictions to process distributions within 45 days of closing, providing LPs with detailed tax documentation for US, European, and African tax reporting requirements.

Fund Performance Impact: The exit, the third in Fund III,  moves Fund III’s DPI from 0.2x to 0,8x, demonstrating concrete progress toward the fund’s 3.5x net return target and validating their expansion strategy into larger, pan-African investments.

Strategic LP Engagement: Several institutional LPs express strong interest in increasing commitments to Kilimanjaro’s upcoming Fund IV, with the RideConnect exit serving as a compelling case study for their ability to execute exits at significant scale.

Market Positioning: The successful exit to a global strategic buyer enhances Kilimanjaro’s reputation for executing international transactions, attracting attention from global corporates seeking African market entry partners.

Portfolio-Wide Application

Beyond the RideConnect success, Kilimanjaro applies the Exit Journey Canvas systematically across their Fund III portfolio:

PayFlow leverages their exit preparation to attract a strategic investment from Visa at a $40M valuation, providing partial liquidity for early investors while maintaining growth trajectory. For Kilimanjaro Ventures, a good opportunity to take 35% of their equity value off  the table.

AgriLogistics uses the Canvas to identify key gaps in the exit thinking early, accelerating their multi-country expansion and positioning for acquisition by a global supply chain company in 2028.

HealthTech Ghana completes a secondary sale of  the full equity position to a healthcare-focused growth fund, providing 4.2x returns to the fund. Two additional portfolio companies complete strategic acquisitions using refined processes from the RideConnect experience, with average exit multiples 25% higher than comparable transactions lacking systematic preparation. Three partial secondaries based on the thorough exit preparedness, Kilimanjaro Ventures is able to secure partial sales to new or existing investors in the market, proving a stand-out exit and liquidity skill.

Key Success Factors

The Exit Journey canvas’ effectiveness stems from addressing three critical challenges of portfolio exits at scale:

Systematic Over Opportunistic: Rather than waiting for buyers to discover portfolio companies, working on the canvas creates proactive exit processes that generate multiple options and competitive dynamics.

Preparation Drives Premium Valuations: Companies that systematically prepare for exits consistently achieve higher valuations and faster transaction timelines. RideConnect’s 10.4x return reflects both strong business performance and excellent exit execution.

Portfolio-Level Network Effects: By applying a strong exit discipline across multiple portfolio companies simultaneously, VCs create ecosystem momentum that attracts buyer attention to their entire portfolio and enhances their reputation for exit execution excellence.

Implementation Guidelines For Scale

For VC firms implementing the Exit Journey Canvas across larger portfolios:

Segment Portfolio by Exit Timeline: Apply different levels of exit focus based on company maturity and fund lifecycle requirements. Not every portfolio company needs immediate exit preparation.

Build Specialized Team Capabilities: At Fund III scale, dedicate specific team members to exit process management, international transaction coordination, and strategic buyer relationship development. These team members are Exit Team, Head of DPI or Chief Exit Officer (not familiar with the role of the Chief Exit Officer? Check out our favourite CEO in MENA, Rabih I. Khoury or how VC firms like Speedinvest think differently about paths to liquidity).

Invest in Infrastructure: Budget significantly for external advisors, legal coordination across multiple jurisdictions, and technical due diligence preparation. These investments compound across multiple transactions.

Maintain Operational Excellence: Ensure exit preparation enhances rather than distracts from business performance. The best exits come from companies demonstrating accelerating growth throughout the exit process.

Develop LP Communication Sophistication: Regular updates on exit pipeline development, competitive landscape analysis, and strategic buyer relationship building create LP confidence that supports larger fund sizes and better terms.

The Compound Effect At Scale

The most successful VC firms treat the Exit Journey not as a one-time process but as a core competency that improves with each transaction and compounds across fund generations.

Kilimanjaro Ventures’ success with RideConnect creates multiple strategic advantages: enhanced relationships with global strategic buyers, demonstrated capability for complex international transactions, validated processes for future exits at scale, and compelling case studies for Fund IV fundraising at $300M+ target size.

By systematically applying the Exit Journey Canvas across their portfolio, Kilimanjaro transforms from a regional fund that “hopes for exits” to an international-caliber firm that “engineers exits.” This transformation becomes a sustainable competitive advantage that drives superior returns for LPs, attracts higher-quality deal flow, and enables access to larger, more strategic investment opportunities.

The Exit Journey Canvas recognizes that in venture capital, building great companies is the foundation, but creating valuable exits requires sophisticated thinking, careful preparation, and disciplined execution. For VC firms ready to operate at international scale, the Canvas provides a proven roadmap for generating the liquidity that sophisticated LPs demand and reward with larger commitments and better fund terms.

Ecosystem Expert Opinion: Anthony William Catt

IPO Readiness & Public Market Optionality

The Canvas: Evaluate IPO readiness even if a public listing is not the chosen path to institutionalize governance, signal maturity, and preserve the option for future IPOs or higher-value M&A.

Why it matters: Most venture-backed exits do not end in an IPO. But the process of preparing for public markets forces companies to professionalize their operations in ways that buyers and later-stage investors value deeply. Auditable financials, formalized governance structures, and robust compliance mechanisms are not just IPO requirements – they are indicators of a company that is exit-ready in any scenario.

Strategic Benefits Of IPO-Style Preparation Include:

  • Higher multiples during M&A negotiations
  • Greater trust from institutional or strategic acquirers
  • Reduced diligence friction and deal acceleration
  • Optionality to pivot to public listing when markets open up

Kilimanjaro’s Approach:

In 2026, Kilimanjaro introduces a lightweight “IPO-style readiness audit” across its top five Fund III portfolio companies. The process reveals gaps in board independence, inconsistent audit quality across regions, and limited investor communications planning. The exercise prompts several actions:

  • RideConnect scores 84% on the readiness benchmark. This audit helps sharpen governance messaging during M&A discussions with Uber, reinforcing credibility.
  • HealthTech Ghana uses IPO-readiness work to strengthen board composition and secure a secondary sale to a healthcare-focused growth fund.
  • One company, previously overlooked by buyers, receives an unsolicited acquisition offer after its reporting package and compliance protocols were upgraded.

The firm concludes that IPO preparation – even without listing intent – significantly strengthens exit positioning and investor confidence across the board.

IPO Readiness Checklist: Key Elements To Benchmark

Implementation Tool:

IPO Readiness Checklist, use this tool to benchmark your top 3 companies annually. Even partial readiness work strengthens exit strategy and investor engagement.

– Anthony William Catt, Founder, Ventures 54, Building London Africa Network

Looking Ahead: To Liquidity Flows

Looking at maturing ecosystems, like Singapore, Switzerland and increasingly MENA, there is a clear trend of value creation, or rising MOIC and TVPI , across funds and investment vehicles. Yet, this may not automatically translate into DPI, or liquid cash-on-cash return. It requires both market maturity, skills development and dedicated resources building out the market.

For the entire industry to ‘work’, we need to be able to generate repeatable, sustainable cash flows back to the universe of limited partners. One starting point, use the Exit Journey Toolkit to expand your exit track record.

Want the Exit Journey Toolkit? Download here.

Av Christian Rangen
Founder, CEO at Engage // Innovate & Strategy Tools – the Modern Strategist’s Toolkit

Investorkapital, business angels & corporate venture avdelinger; stadig flere klynger begynner arbeidet med kapital. Men hvordan skal egentlig en klynge gå frem for å utvikle sin kapitalstrategi?

De siste fire årene har vi jobbet tett med klynger, klyngeledere og nasjonale klyngeprogram. De fleste av disse er solid forankret i Triple Helix logikken; bedrifter i nettverk må kobles mot forskningsdreven innovasjon, støttet av offentlige myndigheter. Dette var den opprinnelige ideen bak Triple Helix på tidlig 1990-tallet.

Men, verden forandres.

Stadig raskere global innovasjon, flere digitale forretningsmodeller og et stort antall velfinansierte vekstbedrifter gjør nå at både bedrifter og klynger beveger seg bort fra Triple Helix til fem-punkt, eller Pentagon modellen. Plutselig sitter klynger med entreprenørskap, akseleratorer, børs-noteringer og privat kapital på kartet. Hos stadig flere klynger dukker nå spørsmålet opp, hva gjør vi med kapital?

Det siste året har vi jobbet tett med flere klynger for å besvare nettopp dette spørsmålet. Hva bør være klyngens kapitalstrategi?

Fra Solklyngen i øst til havklyngene i vest, fra reiseliv til internasjonale drone, mobilitet og fintech klynger har vi nå gjort erfaringer, observasjoner og sett klyngenes kapitalstrategi utvikle seg i praksis.

Vi har nå samlet disse erfaringene i ti punkter for klyngens kapitalstrategi. Vi tror disse er like anvendbare i Bilbao og Bergen, eller Zagreb og Sandefjord. Hver innovasjonsklynge, stor eller liten, må finne sin kapitalstrategi, men her er våre ti punkter.

1.     Styret

Velg en ansvarlig for kapitalområdet i styret. Dette kan gjerne være en kapitalaktør (investor, fond) som velges inn med det mandatet.

Uten forankring og kompetanse på plass i styret kan man nesten bare la være å starte arbeidet i organisasjonen.

Vår observasjon er veldig få klynger har definert kapital som et eget område for styret og få av styrets medlemmer er kjent med at dette er viktig for klyngens utvikling.

2.   Ledelsen

Daglig Leder har et overordnet ansvar for utvikling og implementeringav kapitalstrategi, men er ikke pålagt å ha inngående teknisk kunnskap.

Daglig leder må derimot ha god kjennskap til medlemmenes behov og ønsker knyttet til kapital.

I flere av klyngene vi har jobbet med, har Daglig leder ikke vært i forklare relevans, behov eller betydning for klyngens medlemmer (Se også punkt 5)

3.    Investor Relations Manager

Utvikle rollen «Investor Relations Manager» (IRM). Dette kan være en deltid (%) eller fulltidsstilling. IRM må ha hands-on erfaring med tidlig-fase investeringer, venture fond og vekstkapital. Dette betyr blant annet at en tradisjonell bankleder neppe er riktig profil.

Ideelt er dette en person med flere års erfaringer med tidlig-fase investeringer, bredt kjennskap til investorlandskapet i sin del av verden (Europa, Sør-Øst Asia, Latin-Amerika) og selv deltatt i etablering og drift av venture fond.

Litt for ofte ser vi rollen som IRM fylles av personer med ingen faglige kvalifikasjoner eller relevant erfaring. Da blir også resultatet deretter.

4.   Innovasjonsgruppe

Utvikle en dedikert Innovasjonsgruppe på kapital-området. Denne ledes av IRM, men består av gründere, investorer, venture fond, business angels og etablerte bedrifter.

Innovasjonsgruppen kan være aktiv i de neste punktene.

5.    Kartlegg

Kartlegg dagens kapitaløkosystem for klyngen, enten det gjelder digital helse, Havbruk eller Fintech. Det vil være ulike investorer som dukker opp med ulike mandat og investeringsområder. Sørg for å forstå ikke bare hvem de er, men også deres investeringsmandat, historiske track record og aktive portefølje.

Start med lokale investorer, men kartlegg ut av egen region og eget land. Det er åpenbare investorer som kan kobles på fra land som Tyskland, Japan og USA.

Kartlegg disse inn i et strukturert format og verktøy. Benytt gjerne Kapitalstrategikartet (finnes også i skybasert digital løsning).

 

6. Kartlegg kapitalbehov i klyngen

Kartlegg medlemmene i klyngen, i forhold til deres modenhet og kapitalbehov.

Kartlegging bør avdekke hvor stort kapitalbehovet hos medlemmene er, samlet sett, over en periode på 18 – 24 måneder.

Bruk gjerne Klyngens Medlemmer til å bistå denne kartleggingen.

Erfaringer fra slike kartlegginger er meget positive.

I de tre siste gjennomføringene vi har deltatt i, har det blitt avdekket et kapitalbehov blant klyngens medlemmer på mange hundre millioner kroner; et behov som var nærmest ukjent for klyngeledelsen.

 

7.   Utvikle en Kapitalstrategi

Når informasjonsgrunnlaget er på plass (punkt 5 og 6), jobb med flere stakeholdere (Styret, Innovasjonsgruppen) for å utvikle en konkret og målbar Kapitalstrategi.

Denne bør inneholde et langsiktig målbilde og konkrete steg på veien med KPI’er på år 1, år 3, år 5 og år 10.

Bruk gjerne Klyngens Kapitalstrategi som et utgangspunkt.

8.   Kompetanseløft (felles)

Lanser kompetanseprogram for alle medlemmene i klyngen, samt viktige samarbeidspartnere.

Et slikt kompetanseprogram kan gjerne strekke seg over ulike nivå og mot ulike målgrupper. Et forslag kan være:

  • Grunnleggende Kompetanse for kapital i klynger (1/2 dag)
  • Investorkapital i klynger (2 dager)
  • Engelinvestor i klyngen (1 + 1 + 1 dager)
  • Startups: Investor Readiness Level? (1+1+1+1 dager)
  • Corporate Venture Capital (2 dager)

Disse kan kjøres lokalt, med få eller mange deltakere.

For «Advanced users», vil vi kanskje anbefale

  • VC unlocked (fem dagers kurs, USA, Asia)
  • Executive Venture Capital (fem dagers kurs, USA)

 

9.   Start med de store bedriftenes behov

Dette er ikke et åpenbart punkt for mange klynger, men vi tror det kan være et helt sentralt suksesskriterie.

Ved å kartlegge de store bedriftene, klyngens medlemmers, behov, kan klyngen identifisere strategiske investeringsområder (investments areas) og deretter utvikle særskilte investeringsprogram rundt disse.

Strategiverktøyet, Klyngens Startup Porteføjle kan være et bra utgangspunkt (finnes også i skybasert digital løsning).

Dette arbeidet, med å utvikle klyngens portefølje av oppstartsbedrifter, er forbeholdt veletablerte klynger, da det krever både innsikt, kompetanse og ressurser. For de klyngene som har kommet skikkelig i gang, ser vi allerede et veldig godt resultat av arbeidet.

10. Aktivitetsplan (felles)

Etabler en 18 måneders handling- og aktivitetsplan.

Velg ut noen få områder. Prioriter bort de andre.

Tenk partnerskap, samarbeid og utvikling sammen med andre.

Inngå partnerskap med internasjonale akseleratorer, utvikle program sammen med andre klynger og ikke minst, lytt til hva investorene i klyngen din ønsker seg.

Evaluer og juster underveis.

Først og fremst; Quick Wins

For klynger og kapital er det mye som skal løftes. For de fleste er dette et helt nytt område. Begynn med små seire. Sikt inn på noen raske suksesshistorier. Det er bedre å bidra til 1 million til ett selskap nå, fremfor 100 million om 15 måneder. Jobb frem et lite antall startups og scale-ups som er investment ready. Hjelp dem bygge investor syndikat (grupper), og dra emisjonen i havn.

For både fremvoksende, vekst- og superklynger vil kapital være en viktig del av strategiarbeidet fremover. Spørsmålet er bare hvor og hvordan man ønsker å starte.

___________________

Strategiverktøyene i denne artikkelen kan lastes ned på norsk – gratis – på www.strategytools.io.

four roles of the strategy officer christian rangen

four roles of the strategy officer christian rangen

The role of the strategy officer is rapidly evolving. Expectations are rising, yet changing industry landscapes, emerging disruptors and well-funded startups with aggressive business models puts significant pressure on the role. It is vital for companies to understand the four different roles for the Strategy Officer. Does your company?

In our work with hundreds of companies and dozens of strategy officers, we have come to identify four significant roles for the strategy officer. We believe it is critical for companies to understand how their specific strategy function works and how they can improve it in the face of emerging competition and significant change.

 

The Four Roles Explained

 

INFLUENCER

The Influencer succeeds by creating internal momentum for strategy. This might include sparking key conversations, framing new strategic questions, instilling a sense of urgency, of curiosity within all levels of management ranks.

He acts as a coach, a facilitator and networker internally. Strategy workshops might have very experimental formats, few slides and never have any answered prepared in advance to be presented. He cares deeply about creating shared understanding across complex issues, often simplifying the complex into easy-to-grasp key issues.

The influencer is a master of conversations.

Fred, a long-time client of ours, often prepared his management strategy workshops by asking three advance questions, often framing the questions in a highly challenging context. “What would happen if our market fell by 45% in 90 days?”, or “What if Russia shuts us out?”. While strongly divergent from daily operational issues, the reframing of potential strategic issues, helped expand the thinking and open for radical threats, scenarios and, eventually, strategic moves by the company’s legacy business units.

 

 

BIG SYSTEMS THINKER

The Big Systems Thinker has her focus far outside the home organization. She lives by strong external orientation. She spends 80% of her time on external partnerships, alliances, mapping out M&A prospects and closing deals. She has strong relationships with key stakeholders across the landscape, sensing changes and disruptive trends long before they fully develop.

She excels at sensing potential industry scenarios 20-30 years ahead. Mapping industry shifts and strategic inflection points are just a normal part of her job, giving rise to her role as a complex, Big Systems Thinker. She works closely with emerging startups, VCs and technology investors to have a first row seat to the next generation of companies to watch.

The Big Systems Thinker is a master at sensing the future.

A European media company brought in a former VC and technology founder to help develop an aggressive growth strategy. His network and access to emerging startups on the US west coast, was a large part of why he was hired. Starting in the role, it became apparent his thinking was just too far ahead from the main engine and current focus of the company, eventually leading to his departure in less than 15 months.

 

 

ANALYST

The Analyst is the brainy, educated, numbers person. He is driven by getting tangible facts, allowing for conclusions and clear recommendations. The analyst writes complete business cases to be presented in complex and lengthy slide decks. He might be oblivious to social influence and stakeholder management as a long as he’s getting his analysis right.

If leading the strategy process itself, the analyst’s focus is getting all the facts into organized slides. The analyst is also likely to hold the role of Balanced Scorecard Manager, having a highly numbers- and metrics-driven approach to strategy execution.

The analyst is a master of getting the current facts and numbers right.

We frequently encounter Analysts, tasked with writing the perfect business case for the top management’s consideration. Basic concepts like customer discovery, business model testing and lean startup principles are understood by the people we meet, but far removed from how they work. Often, they experience months of analysis and a strong recommendation, only to be shot down by management. It is frustrating in many organizations to see the effort going into the “strategy as analysis”, while an evolving, involving, learning approach would be far more effective.

 

 

SCOUT

The Scout is responsible for early outside development of new ideas and new networks. Attending conferences and events outside his own industry domain, he gets a peek at upcoming developments across many areas and disciplines. He is likely an avid reader of multiple sources and books. He would be comfortable hanging out at Uber Elevate Summit, Uber’s annual summit for their flying car project, without it having any significant relevance to his company’s day-to-day strategy.

The Scout is adept at scouting future trends and emerging customer behaviors. He early identified the sharing economy and Blockchain as key trends with massive potential.

The Scout might see the future, but he struggles to create internal interest and support. He has limited or zero mandate, funding and execution capability. The Scout suffers from limited impact, over time creating frustration and departure from the organization.

The Scout is a master of seeing early trends but struggles to convert into internal action.

 

 

HOW THEY WORK

 

Their roles are usually very different, as are their working methods.

The Scout will often be working alone or in a very small team, allowing little ability to engage and activate the organization.

The Analyst usually has a team around him, often with more analysts. Combined, they have some reach, but in reality, limited ability to influence and engage with organization.

The Big System Thinker often has a larger team under her, while she personally is both visible and highly influential within the company. Often, she carries a strong vision for the future of the company, balancing the need to serve the CEO vs. becoming the thought leader herself.

Finally, the Influencer uses his network for maximum effect. He might build and operate formal, active strategy networks internally, creating strong reach across the strategy discipline. Equally important is his informal, invisible networks at all levels of the company. He might not push his vision for the company, but through his strategic questions and re-framing of key issues, he actively helps shape the future.

 

PICKING THE RIGHT TOOL FOR THE JOB

In our work with Strategy Officers and their strategy teams across multiple industries, we are often perplexed by the lack of tools they have at their disposal or they choose to use. Through our seven-year R&D project, Strategy Tools.io, we have developed an open source suite of 15+ strategy & innovation tools. A large part of our work has been understanding the context, need and developing the right tool for the job. What we have seen, first-hand, is the effect of having the right Strategy Tools for the job.

 

 

INFLUENCER: STRATEGIC INNOVATION CANVAS

 

The Strategic Innovation Canvas can be applied in multiple ways. First and foremost, it is a great conversation starter on the overall strategic priorities of the firm. Built around the classic Three Horizons, the canvas forces a strategic discussion on short-term vs. long-term thinking.

With a good facilitator, the canvas frequently kick-starts a wide strategy review, opening mindsets and perspectives to a much welcome, more expansive strategy thinking for all participants.

DOWNLOAD YOUR STRATEGIC INNOVATION CANVAS

 

BIG SYSTEMS THINKER: INDUSTRY SHIFTS MAP

The Industry Shifts Map lets groups and individuals map out and better understand industry-level changes and the company’s ability to successfully respond. Columbia Professor Rita McGrath emphasizes the importance of grasping industry level strategic inflection points, something we likely to see at an accelerated pace in the coming decades.

The Map can create a shared understanding of important shifts, in turn driving new strategic thinking.

We recently hosted the CEO of a global services company, based in the US, with operations around the world. Taking him through the Industry Shifts Map helped clarify and visualize the level of change coming within his industry, and at the same time revealing how poorly equipped his firm was for the impeding shifts. He had widely read and reflected on these issues, but working through the Map by himself cemented the coming changes in a clear and visual way.

DOWNLOAD YOUR INDUSTRY SHIFTS MAP

 

 

ANALYST: STRATEGY INTRO

The Strategy Intro is often our baseline, entry level Strategy Tool. For Analysts, it gives a basic framework to balance current core business, new growth and exploring future growth areas. With the right KPIs in place, the Analyst can delight in the Strategy Intro framework. The important thing here, is being able to balance current core with exploring new growth. For most Analysts, this is challenging; most numbers, financial figures and good data is historical in nature, making any future or internal seed projects seem small and insignificant. Yet, successful transformations have taught us to strive for the optimal balance between legacy core and next, potential core areas. With the Strategy Intro, even the Analysts have a tool supporting this ambition; balance today for new growth tomorrow.

DOWNLOAD YOUR STRATEGY INTRO

 

 

SCOUT: MARKET OPPORTUNITIES CANVAS

The Market Opportunities Canvas gives the Scout a one-page framework for mapping, grasping and communicating emerging trends that might provide new, strategic market opportunities. Whether from global megatrends, new technologies or customer needs, the tool allows a simple framework for grasping emerging opportunities. The Market Opportunities Canvas is a easy-to-use tool for Scouts in any type of organization.

DOWNLOAD YOUR MARKET OPPORTUNITIES CANVAS

 

 

 

What’s next? The coming evolution of the Strategy Officer’s role

 

Whether you are an aspiring young strategy manager or an experienced influencer, one thing seems certain; the role of the Strategy Officer is rapidly evolving. For companies experiencing increasing levels of industry changes, new business model innovations from well-funded startups or a massive industry convergence, the role of the Strategy Officer is set to grow ever more important. Driving faster organizational agility, bringing new strategy tools to the job, growing a high-impact portfolio of strategic initiatives, setting up new venture CompanyX-unit and implementing strong M&A capabilities around future needs; the expectations are only set to rise.

Worldwide, Strategy Officers have an ever increasing important yet challenging job ahead. We believe understanding the Four Roles of the Strategy Officer is a starting point. Yet, the real potential for higher strategy impact, agile change and a successful future growth strategy requires a visionary Strategy Officer with the ability to activate and bring the organization along for the journey into the future

_______________________________________

Which role do you play the most as the strategy officer? Share with me your thoughts and comments below.

 

 

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Christian Rangen is a strategy & transformation advisor to top management, boards and strategy teams. His clients range from Malaysia, Middle East and Europe. He is Co-Founder of Engage // Innovate, a strategy & innovation consulting company and Strategy Tools.io – the modern strategist’s toolkit. He is management educator and faculty at BI – Norwegian Business School. His recent projects include Malaysian Innovation Superclusters, Corporate Innovation Bootcamps and Accelerating National Transformation projects.

He can be reached at Christian@engage-innovate.com

www.engage-innovate.com                  www.strategytools.io

 

Successful innovation in large companies is hard. It is easy to make things complex.
We think it is better to keep things simple. Welcome to MIS, your Minimum Innovation Strategy.

Join our experiment and put the MIS to action.

Make the complex simple; like really, really simple

You have probably seen the same thing; innovation is very, very hard. It’s complicated. Complex. Open to misunderstandings and interpretations. It does not get the resources nor commitments. There is often a lack of shared understanding and shared language. It is difficult.

We have spent a lot of time working, thinking and sketching; how can we help make it simpler? How can we help large companies develop a better way, a simpler way, a minimum way?

The answer, for now, is MIS – develop a Minimum Innovation Strategy. We aim to make the complex simple. Very simple.

Building better strategy tools – and booklets to guide you

We build tools that create impact. An important part of that mission is helping users understand how to use and some best practices around using the Strategy Tools. We are now developing a series of videos, How-To guides and aids to help you put Strategy Tools to work.

 

For MIS, we have created a pilot How-To Guide, and hope this can help you put the Minimum Innovation Strategy to work in your own organization.

 

An Invitation (or really, we need your help!)

We are still building and developing the concept of MIS. We have seen it in action. We have seen the impact. But we have not seen or heard your experiences yet. So, we have a challenge or invitation for you (depending on how you see it).

Put the MIS to the test in your organization.

Post your feedback, learning and reflection on our blog, and get a 30 minute 1:1 skype session with strategy & transformation expert and Designer of Strategy Tools, Christian Rangen. Are you up for it?

How to Start

1. PRINT
Print the MIS Canvas (that’s our word for the tool) on a suitable format paper or PVC. We recommend 120 x 90cm, or even 200 x 150cm for groups.  3 – 5 people per group is good. More than six participants and the input and engagement drops. Anyway, print it.

2. INVITE
Invite some colleagues, co-workers or even top management to an informal workshop session (heck, you can even do this during lunch breaks).

3. RUN WORKSHOP
Set up and run a rapid workshop on the MIS in action, for your own organization. We suggest giving a 5-10 minute introduction to the tool itself. More time should not be needed.

4. ACTIVATE
Activate the group(s), get them working on the tool. Get them talking & writing as much and as fast as possible. If all they do is talk, just give them more pens. Ideally, each group should be getting hands on, working on the tool, not just talking to it.

5. SNAP
Snap some high-energy photos. Feel free to post them on social media using #strategytools

6. WORK
Have the groups work 20 – 25 minutes on the tool, depending on the size and maturity. It might be a good idea to have a timer, counting down, to make sure everyone is on the same timetable.

7. REFLECT
Once done, have each group or group member (depending on size of the group) reflect on three questions:

  1. What does the MIS tell us about our current innovation strategy? (if there even is one)?
  2. What was the most interesting/revealing/enlightening/annoying/fascinating part of the process? (pick your own words)
  3. Based on the output; what should we do next?

8. FOLLOW-UP & EXECUTE
Make stuff happen. Try implementing small, incremental changes fast. Run experiments.

9. FEEDBACK
Write a very brief summary of your observations working with the MIS in your own organization.

What happened? What worked well? How did the group take the tool? What was the key success factor in your intro? What was the one thing the group stumbled on? What was the absolute highlight of the process?

Post your feedback in the discussion field of this post, either on our website or Linkedin article. Feel free to include some pictures.

10. DEBRIEF TOGETHER
Let’s set up a 30 minute 1:1 Skype call to go through your MIS workshop. Let’s debrief together and help us understand what worked well and what could be changed at your end.

We would genuinely love to talk with you and hear your experiences in putting the Minimum Innovation Strategy to work.

 

Click to schedule a call now.

Sincerely,

Chris & the team at Engage // Innovate and Strategy Tools.

Leading strategic transformation is one of the most challenging tasks executives face. Over the past six years, we’ve developed strategy tools to help clients navigate a dynamic strategy landscape. Today we’re pleased to announce our latest tool — The Transformation Test. Check it out and see how your company’s doing.

Over the past three years, our team has spent an increasing amount of time on strategy and transformation. The world of strategy is no longer a linear, easy, more-of-the-same, but is changing into something far more dynamic and complex. Faster change, increasing disruption, unlikely competitors emerging with very, very different business models.

Very often, industries are no longer shaped by traditional industry boundaries, but what Professor Rita McGrath calls “arenas”. Industries are no longer stable. They frequently go through strategic inflection points.

All of this requires executives in companies to put new strategy tools to the task of building future-fit strategies.

At StrategyTools.io, our long-term research program, we have developed a growing number of strategy and innovation tools in use with leading companies around the world. Many of our challenges working with clients in solving their strategic ambitions and challenges comes back to how we deal with large scale change and transformation.

An excerpt from The Transformation Test. Download the full strategy tool for free at StrategyTools.io

To help answer this question, our team has developed a simple-to-use, easy-to-grasp strategy tool called The Transformation Test. While the applications might be profound and complex, our observation is that the tool itself gives you a quick snapshot of your company’s strengths and potentially also weakness in how to successfully lead strategic transformation.

How to Use The Transformation Test

The Transformation Test helps teams and management have strategic conversations and measure progress on the topics of innovation, business models and transformation.

It asks you questions under the different tenets of transformation — your company’s Innovation Structure, Innovation Portfolio, Innovation Pipeline, your Successes with Business Model Innovation, and finally, your Transformational Capacity.

Based on how well you answer the questions set within The Transformation Test, you give yourself a score from 1-5.

This helps give a more well-rounded angle on how well you’re doing in terms of transformation.

Download The Transformation Test free from StrategyTools.io.